It looks like my race should be one that we can win: the polls, with an error margin of 5, show my race to be a virtual tie, at 42% for my opponent and 39% for me. Polls also show that when voters know my message I turn that around by 8 points and am ahead 44% to 39%.
When we do win, there is a great deal that can be done for education, the environment, clean energy and transportation to make all of Virginia a better place to live and work. Though I am not campaigning to be the first Hispanic Delegate ever in Virginia, by winning we will show that diversity has a place in our commonwealth.
Transportation being a major issue on everyone's mind today there are a few transportation issues we can tackle today with the transportation funding that we have.
-We can expand express bus service to population centers all throughout west Loudoun and Clark, with discounts for veterans and senior citizens. Once that is done we can continue to work on creating a real integrated bus system, with routes within walking distance of our communities
-I am against the imposition of the vast increase in toll road fares, and will work to speed up the toll road's re-acquisition by the state if the authority persists in taxing our commuters.
-What we need is a fare reduction on the toll road for high occupancy vehicles, and computer synchronized traffic lights on the feeder routes of 50 and route 7.
-End the abuser fees. No source of revenue should ever be based on punishing Virginia drivers. Especially while out of state drivers get no civil fee.
-Perhaps most important of all, I will stand up to developers when they seek to flood the sides of our roads with houses without mitigating the transportation, infrastructure and education impacts they will cause.
That's all for now, visit my website, Martyfordelegate for more. Please join me this Thursday, 5pm-6pm, so we can discuss ways to move Virginia forward. Growth and change are coming to west Loudoun and Clark, and it is long past time that we have a plan.
There is only one response.
Get Rid of Them. They have no place in a transportation bill.
Marty
1) Fairfax County came close to refusing to abide by full testing in English after only 1 year rather than the three of transitional education most experts on English language learning recommend. What if any position should state legislature take on this issue
2) Should the Commonwealth provide the funding necessary for rural schools to have access to non-profit supplemental education services? Currently this provision of NCLB does not take into account the different needs of rural communities (a point I have heard directly from Senators from Wisconsin and Montana, and which I know is also applicable to some parts of the Commonwealth)? Or should instead the position of the state be that SES is an unnecessary punitive sanction which simply makes it more difficult for schools to reach Adequate Yearly Progress, and if the Federal government will not the Commonwealth will provide the additional resources necessary to help such schools improve their performance?
Thanks for your email.
1. We can not assume that 1 year is enough. We need to ensure the students are not just test ready, but ready to fully comprehend what they are being required. I would be supportive of three years of transitional education.
2. I need to do more research on the access to non-profit supplemental education services. I will get back to you on my position.
Marty
Thanks for your comment.
That question deserves a two replies, a "would like to see" that some believe we need to do, and reality.
Would like to see:
Of course we would all like to ensure that any taxpayer funded social program go to the taxpayers who funded them (or non taxpaper who is legal).
Reality:
Most social services take care of the needs of people (legal and illegal) who cannot afford the services within our social system. Those services could be heatlh (vaccinations, TB checks, pregnancy, etc), mental health, dental, food, and medication.
I fine it hard to ask our social services to start investigating everyone who applies for help. It is costly to implement an investigated system like that.
I would not like to think that a child could contract chicken pox, polio, and other diseases or a worker who has TB, or a pregnant women, or a teenagers that are in crisis (gang related, or peer pressure, or etc) who instead of going to a clinic where they can be helped, forego the help because they are afraid they will be arrested.
Marty
As an ex 2 pack a day smoker that question is tough.
I find it would be difficult to have an outright ban, though I also believe that us (now) non-smokers should have the freedom to breathe smokeless air.
I cannot support an outright ban, but would support a bar or restaurant to provide areas where customers can choose to sit in a smoking or non-smoking area.
Marty
I would have to say yes. Any law should be applied withour bias.
Marty
Thanks for your comments.
I am a big fan of Leslie Byrne glad you mentioned her.
I also have to agree with Leslie, I don't believe those laws help the empoyees any where near it does the employers.
Marty
What motivated me for public office was that locally we as a town were taking for granted the council positions and forgot to listen the voters. There were some questionable things going on in town and I felt that we (voters) needed to do something about. After talking to Mark Herring, I decided that best way to change things was to run for office and work to be open, honest and to make things living in our community and quality of life better.
In the next decade, I believe how Loudoun looks is up to the voters. If we continue to elect the type of supervisors we now have, I don't know if Loudoun can be a great place to live. I would like to see controlled growth, more economic development in the way of business moving out here. Roads that are safe and mass transit that everyone can use.
Thanks for your email.
Marty
Bob
I am here. Though leaving soon. Wife is waiting for me to head back to VT to unload some school stuff to my daughters.
Marty