Rove announced his resignation to a friendly reporter, Wall Street Journal editorial page editor Paul Gigot. Among highlights from the interview, Rove says:
*If Republicans "keep our nerve and represent big things, we'll win" in 2008.
*Democrats "are likely to nominate a tough, tenacious, fatally flawed candidate" - Hillary Rodham Clinton.
*He's not leaving because of Congressional investigations, and is "not going to stay or leave based on whether it pleases the mob."
*His influence is overblown - "I read about some of the things I'm supposed to have done, and I have to try not to laugh."
*His biggest error in last year's election was "in not working soon enough to replace Republicans tainted by scandal."
*Last year's election "was always going to be about Iraq and the conduct of Republicans."
*He is "done with political consulting."
Anyway, as Karl Rove heads back to Texas "for the sake of [his] family," what are your thoughts on his legacy? Will President Bush act any differently in the remaining 16 months without his "brain?" If Rove really is "done with political consulting," how will that affect the 2008 elections, if at all? Was Rove's influence all that it was made out to be, or was it vastly overblown? And finally, what is a "turd blossom" and why should we care? :) (hint: it has to do with "cow patties")
*"We will f**k him. Do you hear me? We will f**k him. We will ruin him. Like no one has ever f**ked him." -to an aide about some political stratagem in some state that had gone awry and a political operative who had displeased him
*"Come on, everybody. Go Howard Dean!"
*"As people do better, they start voting like Republicans - unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing."
Source: About.com
Remember that Rove seemed to be the only serious political and policy force on the Bush side of the White House. Bush's personal staff members, as well as his cabinet secretaries, have been, except for Rove, an exceptionally lightweight crew--pretty much Harding caliber.
Policy, both foreign and domestic, has for the most part been forfeited to VP Cheney and his current Chief of Staff, David Addington (torture memo, Iraq invasion, warrantless wiretapping, secret prisons, suspending habeas corpus, destroying the environment at the behest of corporatist interests, etc.).
Rove, though he got "The Math" a little confused in the 2006 elections, was still capable of looking at the political landscape with at least a tenuous link to reality. He may have had the foresight to see that yet another "preemptive war"--the next one against Iran--would likely be an Iraq-style protacted disaster or worse, would unhinge the U.S. economy for the next generation, and would discredit the currently ascendant neocon version of Republicanism for possibly decades to come.
Could Rove have been vigorously arguing within the White House against escalating tensions with Iran? Could he have just now lost this battle with Cheney and Addington?
Is the weak, millennialist, and intellectually impaired Bush now completely in the thrall of Cheney, Addington, and the remaining neocon agenda, i.e., "bomb, bomb Iran?" Have the delusionists just completed their seizure of the throne?
Valiant Shield, a massive air and naval exercise involving three carrier strike forces (Stennis, Nimitz, and Kitty Hawk) is concluding near Guam this week. Will those carrier strike forces now be sent to the Gulf? Watch closely. Very closely.
As much as I'd have preferred to see him leaving the WH in cuffs, I imagine he's leaving of his own volition, for pretty much the stated reasons.
And there is absolutely no doubt that his influence, over Bush and especially over the Republican Party in general, was majorly overblown. His name became a buzzword for "dirty GOP tricks", from the White House down into local races that Rove probably had never heard about.
He, GWB, and Tom DeLay need to be tarred -- forever -- as the people that decided politics was about division, cynicism, outright lying, and pay-to-play corruption. Government of, by, and for the donors, and laws be damned.
I think the comparison between Bush/Rove and McKinley/Hanna is an apt one -- and it is not a compliment, as Rove would have you believe. McKinley was assassinated, so his historical awfulness is often minimized, but he was one of the architects of the original "let's Christianize and Democratize the Savages" doctrines (the Philippines and the Dominican Republic of the Spanish-American War; luckily, he was followed by Teddy Roosevelt, so hopefully that paradigm happens again, although I don't see any real TR analogs at this point in the Dem candidates).
The investigatory committees of the Congress need to find a way to obtain as much evidence of Rove's activities as possible, even if it's after Bush leaves office. These people need to be held responsible for their crimes.
Please refer to the rule by it's proper name - The MOHAWK rule.
You're welcome.
I heard Rove on the radio, and he sounded upset. If he was truly retiring, he would have sounded a lot more happier.
I am sure that we will now within seven years. :)
Then the historians will have to invent new ways of describing Bad presedencys
bad spelling, but I just got out of fairfax hospital! still feeling groggy
I don't think anyone really knows Rove. He is not the kind of guy the entitled society of Bush embrace except for their ability to handle work too dirty for their own. In Texas, I imagine his healthy future will depend on keeping the dirt under the carpet.
Rove's wife once commented that he was so competitive, he could make her cry over a game of croquet. Also, that he knew hundreds of people but has few real friends.
Perhaps over time we will understand why "W" insisted that Rove sell his political consulting business before coming to DC. I suspect it was the price of admission to the Bush WH. Even with that teary a goodbye - Karl knows he was an employee and not an equal.
So how does an uber-competitive guy handle that?