On Logical Fallacies
By: Evan M
Published On: 8/10/2007 11:23:43 PM
One of my favorite things about the Internet and blogs in general is the fact that facts matter. Proper blog etiquette generally means that when information is presented, it should be linked to an original source. So, if you follow the links, you can assess the value of that information.
But presenting an argument, advocating for your position, changing minds, is more than information and evidence. It is also about arguing from logic. The glory of the advent of the blogosphere is the the anonymity of posters. Not because it removes people from responsibility for what they write, but because it means that people's arguments - in general - must stand on their merits.
When you make an argument in person, or watch a debate on television, we can be swayed by the person making the argument, or the emotion of its expression. When the argument is expressed in writing, especially in blog writing, the argument must start with its merits. It may be enhanced by the writer, and the tone, but the argument itself is subject to considered review and as such, needs to be strong, regardless of its expression or writer.
And so, as a service to the blogosphere (ha!), I provide a link to a valuable tool in assessing the arguments and positions we may find on the 'net.
What is a logical fallacy?
As we get into election season, I believe one of the better services we can provide is to keep an eye out not only for errors of fact, but also for errors of logic. Reestablishing the rule of critical thinking in America means spreading understanding of what it means to critically think.
(Crossposted from Leesburg Tomorrow)
Comments