It's the Blogs' Fault!

By: Lowell
Published On: 7/19/2007 5:13:07 PM

Ha, this is very funny:

Chastened by public outrage over the state's costly new fees on the worst Virginia drivers, the Democratic governor and Republican House and Senate leaders promised to fix the law's flaws early next year even as they defended it as a way to make highways safer.

In a rare show of bipartisan unity forged by their mutual support for the 2007 transportation funding bill, Gov. Timothy M. Kaine and House Speaker William J. Howell expressed surprise at the furor but would not call limiting the fees to Virginia residents a mistake.

[...]

Some of the widespread alarm over the fees, Kaine and the legislative leaders said, is the result of inaccurate claims on blogs and elsewhere that led people to believe they would pay thousands for traffic violations as minor as improper turn signals.

Anyway, despite the fact that it wasn't a mistake and it was the blogs' fault for putting out false information (where, exactly?), they "promised to fix the law's flaws early next year."  Right, so the abuser fees provision wasn't a mistake, but it's flawed and needs to be fixed.  Got that?

P.S.  Next excuse, "the dog ate the bill!"


Comments



Bubby's analysis of the presser. (Bubby - 7/19/2007 6:27:59 PM)
Governor Kaine said. ?The appropriate thing for us to do now is to closely monitor the way these fees are implemented, and continue to work together with our partners in the legislative and judicial branches of government to see if there might be ways that we can improve it. When the 2008 Assembly convenes in January, we will have six months of real world experience ? and real data ? to bring to this discussion.?

Translation:  I think I'll just let these guys take their licks in the November election.



Ground Control to Gov'nor Tim (Greg Kane - 7/19/2007 6:28:03 PM)
Ground Control to Gov'nor Tim

You're floating in a most peculiar way
And the stars look very different today

The people need you back
Virginia wants you on track

Can you hear me, Gov'nor Tim?
Can you hear me, Gov'nor Tim?

The people are angry and demanding
Bring that shuttle in for a landing!

Can you hear me, Gov'nor Tim?



this blogsa name should change (pvogel - 7/19/2007 7:04:57 PM)
from raining kaine... to  caning kaine.

(and i am a blue dog democrat!)



Kaine is wrong (Draft Me Please - 7/19/2007 7:38:33 PM)
and bafflingly so. From a reality standpoint these fees are ridiculous. From a political standpoint his behavior is ridiculous. A parallel would be if when Jim Webb was asked about macaca he had said "what's the problem? The guy is a total macaca."

Don't interfere when your opponent is in the process of killing himself, and certainly don't throw yourself on the sword right after him.



Bill Howell's Speech (Lowell - 7/19/2007 7:38:52 PM)
Transcript of House Speaker William J. Howell's Speech
--> Parts introducing other speakers have been removed from this transcript

?I thank you all for joining us to discuss the civil remedial fees ? or ?abuser fees? ? included in HB 3202, the Comprehensive Transportation Funding and Reform Act of 2007.

?Today, I am joined by Senate Majority Leader Walter Stosch, House Majority Leader Morgan Griffith, Virginia?s Secretary of Transportation, Pierce Homer, Chris Konschak, Executive Director of Mothers Against Drunk Driving in Virginia, and, of course, Virginia?s Governor Tim Kaine.

?It may seem extraordinary that all of us are assembled in the same room to publicly voice our agreement on the same issue. But, our shared commitment to improving transportation in the Commonwealth ? and to the success of the compromise transportation plan that went into effect just 19 days ago ? compels us to reach across party lines and set aside normal rivalries to do what is best for the people we serve.

?Today, we are here to underscore the real, bi-partisan support that exists for improving Virginia?s transportation system and for making our roads and highways safer.

?Deterring dangerous and abusive driving has always been and remains the primary focus of the abuser fee provisions of the new transportation law. I believe most Virginians agree that making our roads safer against drunk drivers and other unsafe driving practices is eminently sensible and desirable.

?Safe drivers with only minor traffic infractions or occasional speeding tickets have nothing to fear from the abuser fee legislation.

?Contrary to what critics and others committed to unraveling the transportation plan have claimed, there is no such thing as a $3,000 speeding ticket. There is no $1,000 fee for not using your turn signal.

?But, real abusers ? those who will have accumulated since July 1, 2007 a chronic record of dangerous driving that endangers the safety of everyone on the road ? will and should pay for their reckless behavior.

?Like Governor Kaine has said, ?The dangerous behavior of unsafe drivers threatens the safety of other drivers and causes accidents that create congestion. Those drivers should be financially accountable for their actions.? We here all agree.

?And, that?s why responsible and respected organizations like MADD, the AAA Clubs of Virginia, Driver Smart Virginia and others have been so steadfast in their support of abuser fees.

?Governor Kaine, the Senate (by a vote of 29-10), and the House (by a strong bipartisan vote of 85-15) approved on April 4 the landmark transportation package of which the abuser fees are a part. Because a comprehensive approach to transportation must address improving roadway safety, abuser fees were an essential part of the plan approved by legislators and the Governor.

?These fees will curtail dangerous driving practices that can lead to serious injuries and regularly increase congestion on our roadways. Their passage was a positive step forward, as Secretary Homer, MADD, AAA, Driver Smart Virginia and others here and beyond can attest.

?The clearly expressed intent of legislators and Governor Kaine was that these fees be focused on those who commit serious traffic offenses and repeatedly abuse the rules of our roads.

?To ensure this result, further clarification or small revisions to the Code can be made in the 2008 Session. To remove any doubt ? unfounded or not ? we will make it abundantly clear that abuser fees are not applicable to drivers who commit only minor traffic infractions.

?Likewise, it always has been our intent to treat all drivers equally. To achieve this result, legislators and Governor Kaine already have stated and we here today are reaffirming our commitment to work cooperatively between now and January to find a way to have out-of-state drivers subjected to these fees.

?I want to remind everyone of the context that motivated us to take the initiative in the first place and to act: our principled belief that we could do better than the status quo. Virginians wanted action on transportation and we delivered.

?As Speaker and as a responsible public servant, it is in the public interest to clear up the many mischaracterizations about abuser fees, and resolve any lingering misapprehension about them.

?After all, they are but one part of a much larger landmark transportation agreement that includes a robust $3 billion bonding package for roads, rail and transit projects throughout the state, land-use reforms to better empower local governments to fight sprawl, and VDOT reforms to modernize the delivery of transportation services for a better, more prosperous and safer future.

?Governing effectively means solving problems. It requires leadership not playing political games. That?s what today?s news conference is all about.

?Initiative and bold leadership is what enabled us to defy the cynics this year, address Virginia?s urgent transportation needs, and accomplish the most substantial investment in our Commonwealth?s transportation infrastructure in over 20 years.

?It was a policy success ? measured not merely by words but by our willingness and ability to act and to do so in the best interest of all Virginians.

?I?m optimistic that between now and the upcoming session, the Governor, House and Senate ? Democrats and Republicans ? can and will continue working to show real leadership on this issue.



Oh (leftofcenter - 7/19/2007 7:56:27 PM)
PULEEEEZZZ. Gag me.


seems like... (bault - 7/19/2007 8:30:39 PM)
Howell is the one spreading misinformation.  A one time ticket of as little as 15 mph can result in a $1250 fine and some points stay on a driver's license for 11 years.  That's right- two tickets in 11 YEARS result in additional fines for a previous offense that already cost $1250. 

We gave them their chance.  This is an election issue now and they will pay the price in November.



Bryan, as the person who started the petition... (Lowell - 7/19/2007 8:34:02 PM)
...what do you suggest we do next?  Thanks.


Our contact info isn't hard to find... (Rob - 7/19/2007 7:51:29 PM)
His communications people could've emailed one of us (or Ben).  Or they could post a diary.  If they think we're getting something wrong, a little blog outreach early on would've been a good idea. 


State Sen. John Edwards (Lowell - 7/19/2007 8:53:40 PM)
comments, courtesy of WSLS-10:

It's really an unfixable bill,? said State Senator John Edwards, D-Roanoke.

Edwards wishes the governor had vetoed it the entire transportation bill and doesn't understand his defense of it.

?I think people are going to be disappointed. I think people are already outraged and I'm sorry they are continuing to defend what I think is indefensible,? he said.

Also, from Tim Craig's article in the Washington Post:

But Howell and Kaine, sensing the entire $1 billion a year transportation deal could eventually collapse if they didn't stick together, said Thursday they have no plans to repeal the fees.

They said the public misunderstands the fees, which are assessed on misdemeanor and felony driving convictions as well as anyone who gets eight or more points on their driving record.

[...]

"It affects poor drivers, not poor people," said Kaine, who added his staff will monitor the application of the fees and decide by January whether parts of the law need be changed when the General Assembly convenes in January.

Of course, we know that these abuser fees were designed to raise revenue, not to encourage better driving.  And we also know that if a poor person gets a $3,000 fee, they will have a heck of a time paying it.  So, I'm not sure what Gov. Kaine means when he says the abuser fees don't affect poor people.  Of course they do.