The bill's sponsor, Del. David Albo (R- 42nd District) is a partner in a law firm that specializes in traffic court cases and stands to benefit personally from this legislation. This type of conflict of interest should not be tolerated.
You can say that again!
P.S. According to WSLS the petition was "started by Bryan Ault from Alexandria on Friday."
P.P.S. Read the comments, they are scathing (e.g., "Have our elected officials lost their minds?").
P.P.P.S. It's amazing, this petition went from 15,751 signatures on Thursday morning, July 12, to 100,000 signatures on Tuesday morning, July 17. If anything, the rate of signatures is actually INCREASING, not DECREASING, as this issue is one of the hottest to hit Virginia in a looong time.
Democratic nominee for the Virginia Senate; Rev. David Cox, will speak at Spotswood High School in Rockingham County on Thursday, July 19th at 7:00PM, the topic: Are Higher Traffic Fees The Right Way To Fund Transportation?.
Come join this town hall meeting and meet the Democratic challenger to Mr. Emmett Hanger.
And yes, if I get a traffic ticket I'm going to court, I'm fighting it, and if I lose, I'll appeal. And I'll do it with or without a lawyer...hopefully we'll soon have court clerks, and judges registering their protests.
When Kaine did not change it he has full responsiblilty for a bad piece of legislature.
This mornings Daily Progress had a of the best news story in a while. The voices against this crazy legislation are rising. Link below.
>>>>>>From Va for Better Transportation Newsletter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Gov. Kaine Announces 2007 Legislative Initiative On Transportation
- Package includes land use, accountability and revenue proposals -
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine yesterday announced a revised $850 million package of transportation policy and funding proposals that he will submit for consideration by the 2007 General Assembly. The package seeks to better link land use to transportation, increases accountability and performance standards among the Commonwealth's transportation agencies, and identifies sustainable, dedicated transportation funding.
According to the release, "for the typical citizen, one who does not purchase a vehicle or commit repeated traffic offenses, the Governor's revised $850 million transportation revenue package will cost approximately $15 each of the next two years, and approximately $20 each year after that."
As part of the package, Gov. Kaine will ask the 2007 General Assembly to give local governments the power to deny rezoning requests when there is not enough transportation capacity to support the increase in traffic.
The package also addresses the approximately $450 million annually that will be taken from highway construction and put into maintenance, as well as the approximately $120 million annually that also will be taken from highway construction to repay the approximately $1.1 billion in debt issued against future federal revenues since year 2000.
The Governor's legislative initiative:
Permanently dedicates existing auto insurance premium taxes to transportation, a law enacted in 2000 but only followed twice.
Equalizes the sales tax on vehicles to equal the sales tax for other non-food items. Virginia's current 3 percent motor vehicle sales and use tax rate is 44th lowest in the country.
??????Imposes an abuser fee on motorists who drive under the influence, drive recklessly, or commit certain other offenses.?????????
Increases the registration fee for vehicles from the current $29.50 to $44.50 in 2007, and $49.50 in 2010.
Increases the registration fee on heavy trucks, commensurate with the increase on automobiles.
For the past couple of weeks we?ve been beating the war drums over the new abuser (abusive?) driver fees enacted by the General Assembly. These traffic fees of $750, $900, $1,050, $2,250 and even $3,050 have touched off a grassroots revolt, not least because out-of-state drivers are exempt from having to pay. If you?re wondering why that is, the reason is simple: The Virginia Constitution mandates that revenue from traffic fines must go to the Literary Fund, which helps pay for new school construction. The General Assembly wanted to raise money for transportation so it had to enact these outrageous levies as a type of licensing fee. By their very nature, such fees cannot apply to out-of-state drivers. They can?t even be assessed against illegal immigrants, another thing to consider should you end up getting stuck with a bill.The sponsor of the ?civil remedial fee? bill is Delegate David Albo of Northern Virginia, a Republican lawyer who makes a ton of money defending clients in traffic court. Since this new law almost certainly guarantees that more people will contest their tickets, you could say Albo?s bill is a case of political self-dealing at its finest. Nice work if you can get it.
Given the uproar, we predict it?s only a matter of time before legislators start distancing themselves from this fiasco. Just some idiotic idea by a guy from Fairfax County, right? But a few days ago, the umpteenth mention of Dave Albo spurred a recollection of having read an article about some of his closest friends a year or two ago. The piece appeared in the October 23, 2005 edition of The Richmond Times-Dispatch. Excerpts are below:
Del. David B. Albo's campaign song could be The Beatles' classic, "With a Little Help From My Friends."
Albo is battling for the House seat he has held since 1994 against Democrat Gregory Werkheiser, who narrowly trails the Fairfax County Republican in fundraising.
But Albo's Capitol colleagues have come to his aid, providing almost one-fifth of the nearly $376,000 he reported raising as of Sept. 30. The lawmakers have pumped about $75,000 into his campaign, a sum that's sure to swell in the upcoming days until the Nov. 8 election ?.
The Dominion Leadership Trust, the political-action committee of House Speaker William J. Howell, R-Stafford, had put nearly $146,000 into House races this year through Sept. 30, with $25,000 of that benefiting Albo. OneVirginia, the political-action committee of Democratic Gov. Mark R. Warner, has pumped $367,000 into the contests, including $25,000 to Werkheiser.
Albo's drawing more than money. Last weekend, three Republican delegates from Southside ? Robert Hurt of Pittsylvania County, Clarke N. Hogan of Halifax County and Daniel W. Marshall III of Danville ? went to Fairfax to stump for him, going door to door and bringing him a check for $500 from their political-action committee.
"We don't have opponents, and Dave has always been such a good friend to us," said Hurt, who's also donated $1,000 to Albo ?.
Best Friends Forever: Hogan, Hurt, Marshall and Albo. Remember that the next time you or someone you know gets knocked up by these new fees.
The only thing that's bad about this effort is that it may work and the thing will be repealed before November - and people won't be quite as motivated to vote against the Republicans responsible for this mess.
Keep spreading the word about this petition and maybe those Republicans will cook up a few more excuses for how these fees miraculously appeared in their transportation bill. That's good entertainment and enough signatures might actually get a message through their thick skulls.
according to our paper here.
From his Aug 28, 2006 Money Committee Address:
Both Houses agree on abuser fees. The dangerous behavior of unsafe drivers threatens the safety of other drivers and causes accidents that create congestion. Those drivers should be financially accountable for their actions.
http://www.governor....
From his Jan 10, 2007 State of the Commonwealth address:
Both houses agree that abusive drivers should pay stiffer fines to be used for transportation needs. To solve our funding dilemma, I have proposed a basic transportation financing package. Three elements of the package?proper use of existing auto insurance premium taxes, charges to abusive drivers and a commitment to using surplus dollars for transportation?require no new revenues from law-abiding citizens.
http://www.governor....
From his first transportation plan, six days into office 2006:
This plan includes enhanced fees for abusive drivers .
http://www.governor....
From his transportation plan announced Jan 2007:
Imposes an abuser fee on motorists who drive under the influence, drive recklessly, or commit certain other offenses.
http://www.governor....
2006 Legislation introduced at the request of the Governor including SB 722 DMV; assessment of fees on certain drivers, use of fees collected.
http://leg1.state.va...
So as you can see, Kaine hasn?t been honest with us when he says he knows little about this.
All these articles show is Kaine's hands are not clean and his ideal of making certain people suffer to pay for roads, we all use, is not signs of fair thinking. All I want is cleaning up anyones faulty opinion about fairness to support transportation.
This certain areas can raise taxes to support there area is utterly redicules. I live in Rural VA, but use the roads in Hampton and the WA beltway quite often and I want to pay my fair share, but not in some redicules user fee that will create a hardship on a retired individual.
Now I have to drive down the road worrying ever minute if I happen to forget myself and drive over a certain speed that I will be a reckless driver. Yeah I am a reckless driver? Have not had any traffic violation since 1970, but that could change tommorrow?????
Creigh will hear this afternoon about changing his vote to support this bill, when a previous email said he would not. This "Gov. tweeked the bill and then a yes vote" for a piece of junk doesnot buy it with me.
Albo and Rust's rationale for the fees:
*consider the abuser fees a novel "voluntary tax."
*think "if you don't break the law then you shouldn't have a problem with their bill."
*chose abuser fees as a mechanism for funding transportation because they thought it would be more popular than raising the gas tax.
Governor Kaine:
*thinks abuser fees for people who drive dangerously will make our roads safer to drive on.
The amazing thing for me about Governor Kaine is that even when I disagree with him, I can at least respect and admire the principles behind his point of view. While the GOP unabashedly admits that the whole point behind the abuser fees is to fleece the flock without being blamed for raising taxes, Governor Kaine's talking about public safety. I disagree with him in that I don't think a law can really promote public safety if it doesn't apply fairly and equally to every driver on the road, but at least I know his heart's in the right place.
No one can say the same thing for Albo and Rust--not even Albo or Rust.
"In fact this falsehood is part of a blog-based misinformation campaign to distort the facts." Ah, that clears everything up.
Here's the link:
http://www.potomacne...
Barbara, #28,398
Everyone is intittled to a mistake but not an entire Political Party.
You need to change the title of ths posting. It shouldn't say "15,000" anymore, but the new number: 50,000 and rising.
Lisa
And now, our REAL choice: do we want these Republican flat earthers continuing to control the Virginia General Assembly, or do we want to give Mark Warner/Tim Kaine Democrats a shot at Moving Virginia Forward? Gee, tough choice huh? :)
The virginia drivers were following the law, and the out of staters, not worrying ablout the 3000$ fees, were blowing past us at 100 mph. This is a recipe for huge diaasters, as the safest driving is when everybody is going the same speed
Great job to Mr. Ault for starting this petition and for everyone on the blogs who helped publicize it. If y'all were collecting signatures any faster, the state legislature would have assessed a $3,000 fee on you for your abuse of the intertubes.
"If someone else can come up with $65 million that is not a tax increase, I am more than happy to repeal it,"
The WAPO article follows up with...
A one-cent increase in the gasoline tax, which has not been raised since 1986, would generate about $50 million a year.
ONE CENT! This is what Albo and his Republican cohorts are all worked up about? Earth to flat-earth: Gasoline prices are hovering around $3 per gallon. One cent is a rounding error.
The bill's sponsor, Del. David Albo (R- 42nd District) is a partner in a law firm that specializes in traffic court cases and stands to benefit personally from this legislation. This type of conflict of interest should not be tolerated.
How do you feel about Connolly working for SAIC and participating in making decisions (or even leading the process for decisions) that will benefit SAIC which in turn benefits him personally. Should this type of conflict of interest by tolerated?
Please ALSO be aware that an attorney in Michigan has already filed suit in the MI supreme court to have our law thrown out as among other things, an unconstitutional tax. If successful, it could set a precedent for other states with such similar "bad driver tax" laws. Too bad it's taken 3 YEARS before this has had to happen, because legislators here refuse to repeal it even with bills in the house to do so. Our governor refuses to repeal unless other "pocket picking" initiatives can be produced to replace it.
Legislative hearings were held last year with testimony from judges and drivers on just how asinine this type of law is. It's gotten to the point where some judges refuse to accept guilty please that would incur these fines. Instead they tell prosecutors to lower the offense charge. Judges are DISGUSTED and fed up with this law. I also have the text on those legislative hearings, including just how negatively it impacts people in NJ, where this type of law originated. To put it bluntly, it is a failure in every state. The money collected isn't even half of what is owed or was projected by these pick pocket legislators. It's just a tax grab with negative consequences. And everything bad that was predicted from this type of law, has come true in every state it's in.
Atty. Henry Guikema
125 Ottawa Ave NW #333
Grand Rapids MI 49503
616-235-2601
Brief filed with the court explaining the stupidity of this law
http://woodtv.triton...
http://woodtv.triton...
Wood tv 8 news video on trying to repeal our law
http://video.woodtv....
http://video.woodtv....
Contribute to Clyde's campaign via ActBlue
THEY DON'T CARE!!
It has no legal merit unless it is a HAND SIGNED petition. For all they know it could be the same guy online, signing 130,000 times. And even then the only way you can fight this is by starting a LAWSUIT in Federal court or the Supreme court.
And Michigan is already doing that, and if it fails there, then it goes to the TOP Supreme court. You're blowing hot steam in the wrong direction.