Over the past five years, as the audience and political effectiveness of the progressive, political blogosphere has exploded, the "short head" of the progressive, political blogosphere has undergone a transformation from a loose collection of small, independent, solo projects into a sophisticated media and activist structure driving the national political scene. This transformation has the side-effect of significantly increasing the entry costs into the "short head" of the progressive, political, blogosphere for new, independent actors. As a result, what was once a fluid, "outsider" and "open" form of new media is now, quite possibly, crystallizing into a new "establishment" all its own.
According to Bowers, "the terms 'Short Head' and 'Long Tail'...refer, respectively, to the roughly 1% of progressive, political blogs that receive over 95% of all progressive blogosphere traffic, and the 99% of progressive political blogs that receive less than 5% of all progressive, political blogosphere traffic." "Long Tail" and "Short Head" are statistical terms, in which "a high-frequency or high-amplitude population is followed by a low-frequency or low-amplitude population which gradually 'tails off.'" Here's an illustration:
Again, Bowers' point is that there are just a handful of progressive political blogs that account for almost all the traffic (the "short head"), with tens or hundreds of thousands more accounting for just a small share (the "long tail"). Is this "short head"/"long tail" phenomenon alive and well in the Virginia political blogosphere? It's hard to know for sure, because not everyone reveals their site statistics publicly in a way that would enable comparisons across the entire blogosphere. According to an analysis by NLS, however, the following appears to be the case:
1) There are two blogs - NLS (Alexa rank: 230,095) and RK (Alexa rank: 141,308) - that receive around 1,800-2,400 visits per day.
2) After those two blogs, there's a significant traffic dropoff to blogs - BVBL, Bearing Drift, Virginia Progressive, Bacon's Rebellion (also Richmond Democrat and GOTV ) - that receive from 300 to 600 or so visits per day. This list does not count blogs such as Vivian Paige (Alexa rank: 177,868), VBDems (560,094), and Waldo Jaquith (572,795), all of which likely receive significant traffic but do not publish SiteMeter statistics.
3) After that, there are numerous blogs (the NLS blog roll lists over 100 Virginia political blogs, both left and right...some of which are inactive) that appear to receive under 100 visits per day.
In sum, there are two Virginia political blogs that receive a combined 4,000 visits per day. Then there are half a dozen or so blogs that receive around 300-600 visits per day (for a total of around 3,000 visits per day). Finally, there are perhaps 80 active blogs that receive under 100 visits per day, in many cases well under 100 visits per day. Let's assume those 80 blogs average 50 visits per day, that would result in total traffic of 4,000 visits per day - the same as the top 2 blogs combined. As far as I can tell, a graph of Virginia blog traffic would look something like this:
Looks kind of familiar, with the same "short head" and "long tail" that Bowers describes. Is this analysis flawed, or do you think it's a pretty good reflection of what's going on?
Finally, Bowers' argument is that "short head" blogs differ from "long tail" blogs in significant ways. Thus, "long tail" blogs generally are produced by a single individual in his or her spare time (with "limited communities" and "less varied and original content"). In contrast, "short head" blogs are generally group and community blogs which in many cases have moved beyond blogging per se into direct political action (e.g., drafting candidates). In addition, "short head" blogs are often produced by full-time, professional bloggers. And Bowers argues that it's getting harder, almost impossible actually, for anyone in the "long tail" to break into the "short head."
All in all, there's a lot to ponder here. I think that Bowers has done a great job of "meta-analysis" here, and I commend him for his efforts. My main question at this point is whether the trends Bowers sees at the national level are being replicated at the state and local levels (including here in Virginia). What do you think?
Here in Virginia, Raising Kaine had been consistenly doubling its monthly visits, year-over-year, for a long time now. In June 2007, however, this trend stopped, as traffic leveled off year-over-year. Of course, last year saw us in the middle of a heated U.S. Senate contest, plus several interesting Congressional races. This year...well, for most Virginians, it's simply not that interesting. So, perhaps a leveling off in traffic compared to last year's excitement is not too bad, with 2008 seeing a resumption in growth? What do you think?
As more blogs are created, more filters are created, and a leveling off will occur. You'll still see the few big dogs at the top, but I think the sudden drop from top to the rest will ease a bit more.
The long tail is an effect that's observable in most on-line communities. Very rarely have I been involved with any on-line community where the personalities' popularity and prolificness do not fit into a long-trail graph. It's the normal distribution of the internet. ;)
You could probably pick the short head blogs from the long tail blogs just by blogger effort - either individual leader, or group effort. Hustle always pays off. But there are outliers - blogs run by brilliant young thinkers - the leaders of tomorrow perhaps, which makes the blog ecology so relevant and exciting. A view to the future is always attractive.
And Bowers argues that it's getting harder, almost impossible actually, for anyone in the "long tail" to break into the "short head."
The ?short head? ?long tail? analysis is correct. New blogs in the ?short head? will come from breakup of older ?short head? blogs and from the coalescing of ?long tail? blogs into ?group and community blogs.? The current population is never stable. Blogs come and go from both the ?short head? and ?long tail.?
It has been over one and a half years since a new blog has broken into the "short head" of the national progressive blogosphere, whereas not long ago new members of the "short head" used to be fairly common. Over time, their appearances slowed to a trickle, and now seem to have stopped entirely.
I'm curious, which "short head" national blogs do you see breaking up? I can't think of any off the top of my head...
I'm not sure how this is going to go, but we need a community blog in Kentucky. I'll let you know when we get it up and running. Right now, I'm just learning how to ride this thing without falling off.
Feel free to contact me offline at kber at earthlink dot net or teacherken at gmail dot com
thanks
I did my first blogging here at RK. I'd been trading emails with Jim Webb when I was writing speeches for Fighting Dem Andrew Horne. After we got our ass kicked in the primary, Jim told me about Lowell and what you guys were doing here at RK and I came here and tried to do a bit of work. I'm most familiar with this format, though in reality, I'm a mess when it comes to computing. Ask Lowell. Everytime I try to post something with any html, I end up crying, "Lowell, could you help me do..." To Lowell's credit, he never called me an idiot, even though I proved myself to be one, over and over.
So, I guess, I want to be like you guys and have the same look.
There's a bunch of good blogs on the Soapblox network, so that's good enough for me.