Obama Raises Over $32.5 Million!!!
By: Lowell
Published On: 7/1/2007 1:35:47 PM
Holy crap!
P.S. For the thoughts of Obama campaign manager David Plouffe, see here. Plouffe writes:
If we prevail in the nomination fight, there is mounting evidence that Barack Obama would be the strongest general election candidate. Barack is consistently the strongest Democrat with independents in general election polling, who are the voters that are the pathway to the presidency. Barack also has a 2-1 fav/unfav with general election voters, which is also the best score in the Democratic field. That strength with independents, plus what would likely be very strong Democratic turnout across the country as a result of an Obama candidacy, also likely puts more states in play. We cannot afford another election where we have to run the table to win the Electoral College.
Interesting analysis, what do you think?
Comments
FEC Maps -- Obama's broader financial support (Greg - 7/1/2007 1:50:13 PM)
It's really interesting to click back and forth rapidly between the fundraising maps (these are only through the first quarter report) for
Barack Obama and
Hillary Clinton. In most areas, particularly the South, the Plains, and the Mountain West, Obama's circles on the map are larger. Hillary's are only larger in a few places, but much larger.
Bottom line, Hillary is concentrating on the usual "high dollar" concentrations of extremely wealthy people -- NYC, Los Angeles, and Palm Beach, and making little effort elsewhere.
And Obama's still coming out ahead...
If there is a youth vote, Barack Obama will get it. (Susan P. - 7/1/2007 1:54:17 PM)
Barack Obama has over 400 groups on facebook, and 300,000+ supporters in one group alone. I lost count at 400,000+ total supporters, with many more pages of groups to go. If there is an "echo boomer" vote, it will resoundingly go to Barack Obama. But will they register, and vote? I guess we'll see.
Grassroots is good (Kindler - 7/1/2007 5:01:43 PM)
While I haven't yet settled on a candidate, I have to express my great admiration for the grassroots approach of the Obama campaign.
It's a very positive trend for our politics, whether it boosts him to victory or forces the other candidates to adopt his strategy in order to compete. The more we get away from politics and government of the wealthy few who can afford to play, the better off we all will be.
Tricky questions at this point (Nick Stump - 7/1/2007 7:25:15 PM)
There's still much to considered in this primary. It's amazing how electing a president these days takes four years of constant campaigning. Obama's fundraising is impressive. I'll be curious to see his numbers in rural America. The recent rural voter poll from the Center For Rural Strategies, says the rural vote is moving toward Democrats and I'm clueless to what that might mean when it comes to a showdown between Clinton and Obama.
This election is, of course, very much still up for grabs. I'm probably as good an indicator any anyone. I like several of the candidates, but don't really have any idea who I'll vote for. I do know I'm gonna try to pick the Democrat who has the clearest understanding of foreign policy this time around, as I believe this war and the general unrest and dislike for the US around the world is, for me the most important issue facing us.
It's too bad Jim Webb is not in this race. It would be easy for me to make my decision if he were.
Have you seen (Lowell - 7/1/2007 7:38:49 PM)
the FEC's fascinating
map of Barack Obama's contributions? You can compare to other candidates and see where the money's coming from at a glance. Great stuff!
Proof the polls are misleading (DanG - 7/1/2007 10:45:44 PM)
The truth of the matter is that Hillary seems almost "inevitable" to most Democratic voters. But her supporters, while certainly motivated, don't appear to be as motivated ar Obama's people. Aside from money, these numbers show that Obama's people ar much more willing to give money and time. Hillary's money is coming from the old Clinton power structure. Obama is more of a common-man candidate, and I like that.
Though I'm still backing Edwards for now, I've been disappointed with the campaign for the last few months (both in terms of ideology and performance). If Obama turns out to be the real deal, and not some fluffy candidate, who knows...
Obama's campaign is of course cherry picking... (SaveElmer - 7/2/2007 10:17:16 AM)
Fnr example, Rasmussen has his negatives at 44%...
A large chunk of people still do not know who he is, his negatives will go up...and in the most recent head to head polls he does no better and in some cases worse that Hillary against Republican opponents....
Gotta hand it to him on the fundraising however!!!
Hil's numbers are the worst... (Flipper - 7/2/2007 8:02:27 PM)
The latest Zogby poll results state that 52% of voters will not vote for Hillary Clinton for president in a general election.