Major Immigration Deal Reached

By: Lowell
Published On: 5/18/2007 6:55:08 AM

Yesterday, the U.S. Senate reached what could be an historic deal on immigration reform.  The legislation "would bring an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants out of society's shadows while stiffening border protections and cracking down on employers of undocumented workers."  According to the New York Times:

If the bill becomes law, it would result in the biggest changes in immigration law and policy in more than 20 years. That would provide President Bush with a political lift and a tangible accomplishment for his second term. It would also be a legislative achievement for the new Democratic leaders in Congress, though they said they would seek changes in the measure.

At the heart of the bill is a significant political trade-off. Democrats got a legalization program, which they have sought for many years. Republicans got a new "merit-based system of immigration," intended to make the United States more competitive in a global economy.

In other words, this immigration bill is an incredibly complex compromise that could fall apart any time...or not.  I haven't had a chance to study it thoroughly, and it's extremely complicated, but to me it seems like there are really good elements (e.g., path to citizenship, increased border agents), along with others that are highly questionable (e.g., no significant penalties - as far as I can tell - on big companies that hire and often exploit cheap, illegal immigrants).

All in all, I guess whether or not you support this plan depends on whether you agree with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), who says, "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."  Can a bill that is supported by both super-liberals like Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and super-conservatives like Sen. John Kyl (R-AZ) possibly be a good thing?  Or is this the only chance we have on immigration reform for a long, long time?  I'm not sure, but will be reading about and studying this bill for days to come.  What do you think?

P.S.  Can a bill that is being blasted by the likes of Michelle Malkin possibly be a BAD thing? Ha.


Comments



This bill would destroy the technology profession as we know it (relawson - 5/18/2007 7:12:54 AM)
Other than that, it's just swell.


Can you elaborate on that? (Lowell - 5/18/2007 7:17:51 AM)
I'm asking because I simply don't know enough about the bill (or the technology industry) to fully understand your comment.  How will this legislation "destroy the technology profession as we know it?"  Thanks.


The SKIL bill was included in the overall bill (relawson - 5/18/2007 8:10:48 AM)
Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 :
http://thomas.loc.go...

Click on the section pertaining to H-1b visas.  It is the SKIL bill - George Allen helped draft that.  That bill expands the H-1b program.  It doesn't address a single workplace protection that I have been singing about for so long.

In short, it is going to really harm our profession.  Remember the Durbin/Grassley bill that addresses the H-1b and L1 visa's abuses?  That legislation did not make it into this text.

The top sponsors of H-1b visas are Indian outsourcing firms.  Just so you know we aren't making this stuff up, you can see how many were issued to each company here: http://www.eetimes.c...

IBM is currently involved in a program called LEAN - in short to significantly reduce US staff and increase staff in India.  They also make the list.  Is it fair that companies slashing American jobs are also using large numbers of foreign labor?  The IBM story is here: http://www.pbs.org/c...

Immigration should not be a political favor for corporations.  The Chamber of Commerce must be delighted.



More info on the technology profession (Quizzical - 5/19/2007 11:57:34 AM)
http://www.numbersus...



Allen's SKIL bill with 20% growth. (loboforestal - 5/18/2007 10:12:27 AM)
California companies are trying to sneak throught a major expansion in guest worker visas.  They fine print of the bill, buried late in the document doubles the amount of visas and provides for 20% annual growth.  The already soft caps could allow 3 million guest workers to replace American and green card workers.  The math :

"guests" year
115000 : 2007
138000 : 2008
165600 : 2009
198720 : 2010
238464 : 2011
286156 : 2012
343388 : 2013
412065 : 2014
494478 : 2015
593374 : 2016
2985248 : TOTAL

Unless the H-1B section is deleted, there's no reason for American workers to support this bill.  This whole section is just a subsidy to Bill Gates.

I wish the economy grew 20% a year or my savings account grew 20% a year.

This "immigration reform" bill has too much baggage.
They need to go back and clean it up.



1986? (novamiddleman - 5/18/2007 7:17:50 AM)
I hate saying this but sometimes compromise is a bad thing.  This bill tries to do too many things to satisfy different factions and ends up not being very good at all. 

I think this issue is complex enough that we need some studies outside of congress and the political process (much like the Iraq study group)

My ultimate fear is that in 2027 we will be discussing this issue all over again



Before I begin studying this bill... (Dianne - 5/18/2007 8:04:57 AM)
I would note that Michael Chertoff, when asked how long it would take to implement all of these enormous and expensive reforms, conveniently said that it could all be done in 18 months.  Isn't that about the time that Bush leaves office and won't be responsible for not meeting the deadline?  Ummmm. 


Bill of Flight (J.Scott - 5/18/2007 1:10:00 PM)
This bill of some 700 pages is like a throw back to the old Great Society legislation or even the early Welfare state doctrines of the past...did we not learn anyhting. Trying to solve a problem with this type of umbrella bill is absurd. Look deep into who is behind this bill, one by which never went through committees or hearings such is the norm in the Senate, but was a measure drawn up by politcians and yes get this...illegal immigrant activists groups and lobby groups were involved in constructing the language of the bill...unbelievable!! They have just recommended making what they say is a 12 million person problem and turned it into a 50 million one.How? Once amnesty is granted to an illegal immigrant, he/she may bring their family into the country as well...while American families on avergae have just under 2 children, Mexican on average have around 4...ie twice the size of our current average. What will be doing about cost of living, living wages with the "Flight" to America from the south, rise in health costs and above all the right those with amnesty have to benefits under social security. What a mess.
HERES A THOUGHT: How about follow through on the last measure to construct the wall (ie only two miles done), fix the Border patrol exodus problem as they seek employment elsewhere due to a Government that does not support them and above all fix the whole process of "legal" immigration and visas first before throwing attempting this amnesty nightmare. Go to the Library of Congress and read this bill..it is absolutely amazing and to think this is the Presidents plan..if this passes the fallout will be the gradual loss of the South by the Republicans as Democrats will be able to say "Hey, President Bush signed that bill" regardless of who (ie Kennedy) drafted the thing.