Del. Dave Marsden Live Blog Tuesday, 4 PM

By: Lowell
Published On: 3/12/2007 5:31:45 PM

The following is from Delegate Dave Marsden (D-41st).  Dave will be available at 4 PM tomorrow (Tuesday) to answer your questions.  Please feel free to leave them here starting right now.  Thanks!

This year's General Assembly session adjourned on Saturday, February 24th. We were fortunate not to have a budget deadlock this year and we made great progress in funding our core priorities: education, public safety and health care. As well, we took a terrific leap forward for mentally retarded and developmentally disabled Northern Virginians by providing waiver slots that will allow those individuals to access the services they need to lead "a life like yours". With this investment, fewer of Northern Virginia's parents will find themselves with the agonizing decision of either leaving their communities or sending their children to other parts of the state to receive the services they require.

Transportation continues to be a challenge for us. A transportation bill, albeit flawed, passed both houses of the General Assembly and Governor Kaine is currently in the process of amending it. I am optimistic that he will provide us with a viable piece of legislation that will both meet our needs and be fiscally responsible. I have supported moving the process of finding a transportation solution forward at each turn. The funding provided by House Bill 3202 is insufficient and sustainability of these funds is in question. But these are both problems that we can fix working together during the upcoming veto session and next year. We cannot fix next year our failure to start this year. Our quality of life depends on us taking action now. I will continue to support Governor Kaine's efforts to make this bill work for Northern Virginia and get our traffic moving.


One of the most significant legislative achievements for me this year was changing Virginia's "once an adult, always an adult" law.  Currently, if a child 14 years of age or older is transferred to adult court, he merely has to be "treated or tried" in that adult court to be considered an adult for all subsequent offenses.  For example, a child transferred to an adult court for auto theft and found to be innocent would be an adult for life all subsequent charges.  This is fundamentally unfair because it penalizes the child by putting him or her in jeopardy of facing incarceration with adults for something as minor as shoplifting.  This has been one of the rare occasions where what was originally thought of as "get tough" legislation has been rolled back in deference to common sense and effective treatment of children.  Word of this legislation has spread through the National Juvenile Justice Coalition and youth advocates have been very encouraged by its passage.  I'm thankful that we'll be doing better by our children with HB 3007 as law. 

My Green Buildings Bill (HB 2656) was the most aggressive offered in the General Assembly this year as it held construction of state buildings to the LEED Silver standard.  Many in the sustainable development and green building community were excited about this bill as well as others being introduced this year.  The Administration was anxious get a bill passed this year and asked that I roll mine into Delegate Adam Ebbin's bill which was then referred to the Housing Commission.  We moved the ball on this issue a few yards further down the field and I'll continue to be an advocate for doing what's both environmentally conscious and fiscally responsible.  Green buildings save money! 

I introduced a bill (HB 2663) this year to hold the lawn care industry accountable for broadcast spreading pesticides and fertilizer on hard surfaces such as sidewalks, streets and driveways that our children often play on.  They do this to save time and the result is that chemicals wash directly into our water systems and ultimately the Chesapeake Bay.  This common sense bill met furious opposition from the Agribusiness Council, even after I acknowledged their initial concerns and addressed all of them in an amended bill.  The bill was defeated on a straight rural-urban split, with rural delegates apparently yielding to pressure from that powerful industry in their districts.  After I calmed down from having been upset by this utter disregard for the health of our Bay, I called a meeting of every conceivable industry and government agency that is affected by this form of water pollution.  It was a successful meeting and all the stakeholders agree this is a practice that must be stopped.  We are reconvening the group in August and I expect to hear about the progress these groups have made.  If I do not, you'll be hearing a LOT more from me on this issue.  Amazingly, for the first time in recent memory, my lawn service managed to keep their products on my grass instead of distributing them on the sidewalks and street in front of my house.  I strongly encourage you to monitor your lawn service and that of your neighbors so we can do our part to stop this as well.  If we can't do this kind of simple, common sense, no-cost adjustment to the way we operate, I'm terrified for the long term health of our Bay. 

Thank you Lowell for this opportunity and I look forward to everyone's questions.


Comments



Higher Education (Ambivalent Mumblings - 3/12/2007 7:49:37 PM)
Hi Dave, thanks participating in the live-blog. As you know, Virginia has a reputation for being the home of several nationally respected colleges and universities. Unfortunately, the cost of a higher education has also become a significant burden for some of Virginia's families. What steps, if any, do you believe the General Assembly could take in order help more middle and low income families cover the costs of college?
-Bryan Scrafford


re: Higher Education (DelegateDaveMarsden - 3/13/2007 4:03:40 PM)
Good to hear from you Brian.  This is an issue that every state struggles with, particularly those who place such a high priority on having a superb higher education system.  The problem is this: tuition must be set high enough to not subsidize those who can easily afford tuition and not so high that it precludes low income students.  With this in mind, more schools need to emulate the program at UVA, which as I understand it, guarantees you the money you need based on the difference between what a year of college actually costs and your estimated family contribution.  We, as a General Assembly, need to prioritize funding to make sure the other universities meet this same need to the extent they are not doing so already.  Which is to say, we need to increase our financial support for higher education with the message that this is the sort of program they should implement.  I just think that we should be expressing the sentiment to our state universities that financial aid is vitally important for their mission. 


Following up on that last question ... (Rob - 3/13/2007 8:44:43 AM)
... it seems that every year, our top higher ed institutions get less money and slip in competitiveness with their peer schools.  (And, of course, less public funding leads to tuition increases)  Can we expect to reverse this trend in the future.


re: Following up on that question... (DelegateDaveMarsden - 3/13/2007 4:17:44 PM)
Good question Rob.  The problem you refer to is especially evident at George Mason, the state university in the house district adjacent to my own.  Many of its professors and support staff are constituents of mine.  The higher cost of operating a university in Fairfax County versus other areas of the state is not adequately accounted for in higher education allocations.  One problem that I've become aware of, particularly with regard to competitiveness, is the difficulty George Mason sometimes has in attracting and retaining top professors due to the cost of living here.  Even the George Mason police department is effected by low state aid and high cost of living.  Unfortunately, it seems like we've been stuck in a process of one step forward, one step back with regards to higher education funding.  For example, paying for the car tax combined with our economic downturn created cuts to higher education that Governor Warner's tax restructuring in 2004 eventually restored.  We just have to make sure that we continue moving forward instead getting pulled backwards. 


On transportation (Rob - 3/13/2007 8:47:10 AM)
What would you do to fix this flawed bill?  Can Kaine make enough amendments to what Russ Potts called a band-aid solution?


re: On transportation (DelegateDaveMarsden - 3/13/2007 4:35:22 PM)
The Governor has a number of options to consider when improving this bill.  First and foremost, the aspects of the bill dealing with counties like Fairfax taking over secondary road maintenance have got to be eliminated.  The additional maintenance dollars we would receive do not make up for the lack of infrastructure, staff and equipment we would need to make such a plan work.  Having worked with and for state government, I have learned that the state makes promises of financial support only to have that support reduced or frozen as circumstances change.  The state often has the best of intentions but can be an unreliable partner. 

The challenge for Governor Kaine is to amend the bill or provide an amendment in the nature of a substitute that enough House Republicans can live with.  This will not be easy because many of them have made the disastrous decision to sign "No Tax" pledges.  These pledges are severely limiting the General Assembly's options in setting responsible policy.  Because of these pledges, they have committed us to long term borrowing and forcing taxing decisions to regional collaborations, which are tenuous at best.  The interesting thing is that as he travels the state, Governor Kaine has been finding a great deal of willingness on the part of Virginians to pay more in order to adequately address this problem.  Those experiences would seem to contradict the Republicans's contention that the people don't want to pay more for transportation.  If that's the case, the Governor has a laundry list of options that he can employ to raise the necessary revenue.  My preference is for a broad financing plan that doesn't overburden any segment of the population. 



Del. Marsden (Ghost of A.L. Philpott - 3/13/2007 10:46:32 AM)
...Who are you picking to go all the way in your NCAA Mens Basketball Tournament bracket? I know as a representative of the Commonwealth you must be pleased by the showing of teams in this year's Dance, and will surely feel the urgency to pick one of our four teams represented.


re: NCAA (DelegateDaveMarsden - 3/13/2007 4:38:03 PM)
I think it's pretty clear that UVA, Tech, Old Dominion and VCU are locks for the Final Four.  But slightly more realistically, I ended up with UCLA in my pool, so they're my fifth choice. 


On Environmentalism (Eric - 3/13/2007 10:52:44 AM)
I'm glad to hear that the green buildings efforts are making progress - albeit at a snails pace thanks to the flat earth Republicans in Richmond.

My question is about what other environmentally friendly measures are coming up.  Either that you hope to introduce or that you've heard others are considering.  Even if you're not at liberty to disclose specifics I'd love to hear that more is on the way. 

An angle I'm particularly interested in is what Virginia could do in terms of incentives (most likely tax break related) to encourage individuals to invest in green friendly solutions such as hybrid cars, home solar panels, energy efficient appliance upgrades, and home insulation improvements.  Given that Republicans hate taxes anyway, is there any chance of getting tax breaks for such green personal investments?

And thanks for blogging with us!



re: Environmentalism (DelegateDaveMarsden - 3/13/2007 4:51:49 PM)
Terrific question, Eric.  I think one battle we're beginning to win in the General Assembly is making the point that being environmentally responsible is both cost efficient and has the potential to yield great economic benefits.  But we've definitely got a ways to go before we convince many on the other side of the aisle of that.  I think the most important thing we can do is continue to keep the pressure on, continue to offer new and innovative ideas as legislation and build on our small successes.

Just this past session, we saw bills pass the House that provided net electric metering (which incentivizes solar panels) and a tax holiday for energy efficient appliances.  Of course, here in Northern Virginia we have been extremely successful in encouraging the purchase of hybrid vehicles by allowing them in HOV lanes, to the point that unfortunately we've clogged our HOV lanes with them and have had to add restrictions.  One of the really exciting and I think unanticipated consequences of this has been that hybrid cars have become trendy, further spurring demand. 

I believe there have been tax credits available for home improvements that increase energy efficiency, but I'm unsure as to how that has worked.  Thanks for that suggestion, I'll look into that further with an eye towards next year. 



On to more serious questioning... (Ghost of A.L. Philpott - 3/13/2007 10:57:09 AM)
How do you feel about having Del. Ward Armstrong (D-Collinsville) as our new minority leader? You can feel free to explain what legislative attributes and leadership credentials he may bring to the table as we attempt to move our party forward into the majority.


re: On to more serious questioning... (DelegateDaveMarsden - 3/13/2007 5:14:02 PM)
First, let me say that Frank Hall did a great job in getting us to where we are today.  Frank has been very supportive of newer caucus members like me and I admire him greatly.

Ward Armstrong may be the best strategist in our caucus.  He is clearly one of the most gifted defenders of caucus positions we have when he stands up on the floor.  Along with Ken Melvin from Portsmouth, I think we have the most effective one-two punch for conveying our positions in the legislature.  Ward will bring far-ranging strategic planning that will be witnessed on the House floor every day.  I believe that we are putting together a caucus leadership team that will give us a great boost towards reaching the majority, starting next November.  This is all about having our vision for Virginia prevail over that of the Flat-Earth caucus in the Republican party.  Make no mistake about it, the House Democratic caucus is committed and resolved.



Thanks Lowell (DelegateDaveMarsden - 3/13/2007 5:25:26 PM)
I appreciate having the opportunity to come on here and talk to everyone.  I can always be reached at deldmarsden[at]house.state.va.us or at my office number, seven-zero-three-three-two-three-four-seven-three-three.  Enjoy this wonderful weather!

-Dave