...His popularity has led some analysts to speculate that if Mark Warner declares he will seek the Senate seat in 2008, John Warner may retire to avoid a grueling re-election battle against the former governor.Other analysts say Mark Warner will avoid the Senate race if John Warner seeks reelection...
So let's get this one straight: if Mark runs John won't, but if John runs Mark won't? Is this like a game of "hot potato" or something? :) And if Mark (not John) doesn't run, then who will? According to the Alexandria Times:
Should Mark Warner decide not to seek the Senate seat, Democrats may turn to current Governor Tim Kaine. With just a 52 percent approval rating in the same Survey USA poll however; Kaine may have difficulty levying a serious challenge should Warner stay in the race.
Interesting, but I honestly don't see that happening. Kaine's got until December 2009 as governor, and it seems to me that he still has a lot he wants to accomplish. Which leaves us...I'm not sure where. I guess we'll all just have to stay patient, and hope that the situation gets clearer after, for instance, the Democratic Presidential nominee selects his or her running mate. Obviously, if Mark Warner's on a Presidential ticket, then he's not going to be running for U.S. Senate against John Warner. We'll see.
And for those of you with an exclusively national focus, a different balance of power at redistricting time could permit a number of intriguing possibilities:
1. Franklin County and Virgil Goode get redistricted into the Ninth against Rick Boucher.
2. Thelma Davis and Randy Forbes get put in the same district, or Randy Forbes and Eric Cantor perhaps.
3. Frank Wolf and Tom Davis fight over some Republican precincts, and one of them loses, making him more vulnerable.
4. A 12th Congressional District is created (depends on population, but we'll be close) and it comes in a Democratic stronghold, not a Republican one.
There are other possibilities which may seem remote, but probably no more remote than the possibility that George Allen and Tom Bliley would get put in the same district in 1991.
The redistricting in 2011 is crucial.
Tim Kaine could not run for Senate in '08, but should Sen. Webb run for re-election in '12.. he was to wait until '14 to challenge the republican.
2014! That's a pretty long time.
We can take back the J. Warner seat in 2008, with the right candidate.
I will support Mark Warner, that's why I am collecting online signatures to draft him.
Should he publicly decide not to run for Senate (hope he doesn't) than Kaine my man for '08.
Furthermore, I don't understand the whole "Warner would be better as Governor again to run for President"
That just doesn't make any sense to me at all. We don't even know who's going to win in 2008 for sure. And let's say the democrats do win he wouldn't get a shot from anywhere to 8-16years!!!!!
So, what's THAT all about. If Mark Warner wants to run for Governor again in 2009 it's because he wants to be Governor again not because he wants to use it as a launching pad to run for President on some future date.
I still think and believe Mark Warner should run for Senate, if not Tim Kaine. I believe they are the only 2 Democrats in Virginia that could take out John Warner.
Just think about it, a bonafide war hero (webb) almost lost to a racist! People don't understand the politics of Southern and Southwest Virginia.
NOVA may be changing, but not fast enough for progressives, moderates, and Democrats like us.
If we want to win in 2008, we will get behind a candidate who can win just as we did in 2006.
Harris Miller couldn't have beat George Allen. If someone thinks he could have, please give me some of whatever your smoking I think I need it more than you do!
=)
So IF John Warner stepped down, I'd be for Kaine running for the seat.
Who's saying what? Until it's public, it's safe to say we don't know and try to convince M. Warner on '08.
I think he's still trying to weigh his options and decide what's the best way to contribute.
That's what I get from his public comments both printed and said to others.
I haven't heard anyone say Mark Warner said "he's not running". Because no one knows that.
Hey, I am going to try to push Mark to run for Senate until he and only he tells me or makes it known to everyone he's not interested.
Until then, let's get him interested!
I think our best hopes are a bruising primary fight for J. Warner, causing him to step down. Hopefully his vote last Sat. on the Iraq debate will help those prospects.
John Warner is beatable, but it has to be with the right candidate. During the last leg of the Webb campaign Lowell posted the Warner vs. Warner factor.
Mark Warner to no surprise beat John Warner's positive figures by far. And since 1996 Mark Warner has become one of Americas most popular figures (which means national fundraising ability).
But, it's up to Mark Warner to decide to run or not. but the Democratic party isn't going to just let John Warner run unopposed.
I just hope that candidate is Mark Warner.
I still highly doubt Mark Warner has any interest in serving in a legislature, since he made himself as an executive serving in that style making those types of decisions. I don't think its far fetched that Warner comes back in 09 to run again for Governor, based on his incredibly favorable views of the position.
I'm sure John Warner will be opposed, but I'm saying I don't see it as any of our top dogs, and DEFINITELY not Kaine. HA!
Are there really any other big names?? Please no one say Don Beyer...
As for everything else, I merely wanted to remind everyone how ridiculous the scenario of our Governor running for Senate before his term was up was. Democrats know how to govern, and we know how to finish our jobs. Implying Kaine is merely out to get higher office isn't in our best interest, but I understand the speculations game.
As for Warner 08, montoya, have a ball drafting him. I just disagree that the Senate is a good fit for our former Governor.