This prayer is far from a bit of historic arcana. Books by J. William Jones are still being reccommended for children. christianbooks.com carries one work of J. William Jones, Christ in the Camp, as a text.
Your older students will be inspired by this eyewitness account of the spiritual battle waged for men's souls during the American Civil War. Through letters and memoirs, Confederate army chaplain Jones chronicles heroic ministry on the frontlines; worship and revival services in the camps; and the witness of Christian generals like Robert E. Lee and Jeb Stuart.
Jones' influence in Virginia, Georgia and the South more generally was significant.
John William Jones was born 25 September 1836 in Louisa County, Virginia, to Francis Willian Jones and Ann Pendleton Ashby Jones. Jones attended the University of Virginia, graduating in 1859, then attended the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Greenville, South Carolina. Ordained in 1860, he returned to Louisa County to preach at Little River Baptist Church. When the Civil War began, he enlisted as a private in the 13th Virginia Regiment, then became regimental chaplain, then a missionary chaplain to the army. Jones conducted revivals in the army throughout the war. After the Civil War ended, he preached at the Baptist Church in Lexington, Virginia, and was chaplain at Washington College (now Washington and Lee University). He served churches in Ashland, Virginia, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina, as well as serving as chaplain at the University of Virginia and the University of North Carolina. He was the secretary of the Southern Historical Society from 1875 to 1887, and he edited and wrote several works on the war and on Robert E. Lee. Jones was chaplain-general of the United Confederate Veterans from 1890 to 1909. Jones married Judith Page Helm in December 1860, and they had five children. Jones died in Columbus, Georgia, 17 March 1909.
Last week on Slantblog, F.T. Rea wrote History vs. Heritage With Malice Toward None.
In 1961, my seventh grade history book, which was the official history of Virginia for use in public schools -- as decreed by the General Assembly -- had this to say about slavery at the end of its Chapter 29:"...Life among the Negroes of Virginia in slavery times was generally happy. The Negroes went about in a cheerful manner making a living for themselves and for those whom they worked. They were not so unhappy as some Northerners thought they were, nor were they so happy as some Southerners claimed. The Negroes had their problems and their troubles. But they were not worried by the furious arguments going on between Northerners and Southerners over what should be done with them. In fact, they paid little attention to those arguments."
That sounded awfully familiar in a flashback kind of way. Some of the material currently found on West Virginia's web site is not very different from Rea's childhood textbook.
The mission of the West Virginia Division of Culture and History is to identify, preserve, protect, promote, and present the ideas, arts, and artifacts of West Virginia's heritage, building pride in our past accomplishments and confidence in our future.
Here's part of that West Virginia heritage.
Booker T. Washington's West Virginia Boyhood
By Louis R. Harlan
Volume 32, Number 2 (January 1971), pp. 63-85
The slaves on the Burroughs' farm near Hale's Ford, Franklin County, Virginia, learned that they were free in the spring of 1865, but the slave cook Jane, her mulatto children John and Booker, and her black child Amanda, were still milling about the Burroughs' place three months later, searching for aims of their own to replace the purposes given to their lives by the master and mistress.
...The danger of a black man transgressing the racial codes of the whites was certainly one of the lessons of this incident. But another lesson was a class one, that the white paternalist was the black man's only friend, albeit never a perfect one and in this case an ineffectual one.
...How much Booker and his family understood of these economic forces that doomed Malden is uncertain. They may have had some knowledge of the salt works from other slaves, for Franklin County had long been a source of supply of hired-out slaves. In 1839, for example, the Lewis and Shrewsbury salt furnace at Kanawha Salines issued a pass to nine slaves of Asa Holland of Hale's Ford to visit home. Holland lived just down the road from the Burroughs' place, and just across the road was Bowker Preston, who owned seven slaves employed at the Salines at the time of his death in 1851. It may even have been that Wash Ferguson had spent the war there as a salt packer, first as a slave and then as a wageworker.
Georgia acknowledges the controversy over textbooks.
http://www.georgiaen...
Georgia also has a page on E. Merton Coulter
Ellis Merton Coulter, a University of Georgia professor and historian of the South,
Courtesy of Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript Library, University of Georgia LibrariesE. Merton Coulter helped shape the southern public's interpretation of its heritage in general and Georgia's in particular. He taught at the state's flagship university in Athens from 1919 to 1958 (serving as chair of the history department from 1940 until retirement), edited the Georgia Historical Quarterly for fifty years, and produced 26 books, 10 edited volumes, more than 100 articles, and numerous book reviews and newspaper columns. He was also a founding member of the Southern Historical Association, serving as its first president in 1934 and nurturing it throughout its early years.
Writing with purpose and teaching with passion, Coulter emerged as a leader of that generation of white southern historians who viewed the South's past with pride and defended its racist policies and practices. He framed his literary corpus to praise the Old South, glorify Confederate heroes, vilify northerners, and denigrate southern blacks.
History of Georgia
Generations of Georgia whites gained their distinctive perspective on their state's past and its present condition from his college textbook A Short History of Georgia (1933; revised 1947, 1960) and his junior high school text History of Georgia (1954). Published in the same year as the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision mandating public school integration, Coulter's junior high text taught children that slavery greatly benefited southern blacks, and emancipation negatively altered their condition. "People in the South did not believe the Negroes ... would know how to vote," Coulter wrote. Because former slaves often "sold their votes to dishonest people who wanted to win elections," Coulter assured Georgia's youth that the white people of their state determined that blacks should not participate in elections and "worked out a special plan" that kept "most of the Negroes from voting." Similar themes permeated Coulter's other works. To him the term Georgians applied to whites only; the state's black inhabitants constituted a subservient, inferior, and threatening element.
Hopefully, these references give an idea of what generations of Southerners have been taught about our history. I want to thank F.T. Rea for his diary as motivating me to take the time to look at some of this material more carefully. There's no shortage of ideas in the body of Southern tuition that don't hold up under careful inspection, and I hope to write about them in subsequent diaries.
It's sort of like describing the insurgency in Iraq by saying, "After Saddam's government fell, conditions became unsettled. "
This preoccupation with making Americans seem utterly heroic and never blameworthy has important implications, because many Americans cannot believe America is ever in error.
(I'm glad to lend you the book, Kathy.)
It was very edifying, since it spoke about the 400 years of African American history. They'll have a national touring exhibit that emphasizes the History of African Americans as told, written, depicted, conveyed and performed by African Americans.
Check out the Covenant With Black America.
For me, this is something I have believed ever since a woman history/government teacher said it to me in 1964-1965 when my high school (finished up my last two years in Virginia) had just been "integrated" with one black girl and one black boy. She told me to also consider that history was usually written by men, something that I also needed to take into consideration before adding anything to what she referred to as my "core beliefs". I realize now through that clarifying "window of time" that she was a feminist; ahead of her time; and fully cognizant of the fact that she was bucking the norm by even saying these things to me. She really didn't like the textbooks we were using and would often "go off the rails" as far as she could to try to broaden our conceptions. A great deal of what she said fell on deaf ears, but I heard her.
Being brought up in the USAF, moving in and out of many different cultures, I was having some trouble finishing up high school in a state where attitudes on this subject were very different than I had experienced before. As a disclaimer here I will say that I had little exposure to this issue because the Air Force was somewhat insular. Being an officer's daughter insulated me even more. I remember no black officers or families with which I could have interacted. In a way this was, ironically, a good thing because I had no pre-conceived ideas, but got slammed hard when I moved to Virginia. I am not picking on Virginia here, since I had just spent two years in Sumter, South Carolina, I was just younger then and not really paying attention....
My somewhat long-winded verbose point here is that I honestly believe (thanks to that one memorable teacher) that all the facts both good and bad, need to be on the table and never hidden away before we can go forward. No culture or society can hide its warts and expect to prosper.
Schools should teach the truth.
Schools should teach the truth.
Parents should be honest with their children.
And clerics should speak the truth about the diversity of religious belief.
Here's where I am part of the problem. When I learned that one of my great-great-great-great grandfathers owned slaves, my first response was "at least it was only two." Two or two hundred, it doesn't matter. That's a measure of economic advantage, not ideology. But it was a knee-jerk reaction to minimize the involvement.
Anyway, the more I look at the raw data, the more apparent it is that several "facts" have been emphasized to paint a picture that is not really very accurate. So there are about three specific ideas at the top of my list right now..
But going back to "at least there were only two," that's the very same excuse-making that permeates what I'm reading. When people do genealogy, there are often gratuituous paragraphs saying how well one's ancestors treated their slaves. One of the Massies from here in Nelson referred to his slaves as "my people" and much was made over that as to how humane he was.
So, if you read my anti-cockfighting rant the other day, I'll tell you the story of my grandfather (who died before I was born). In 1920 he ran a cockfight, indoors, in the "ballroom" of the town hotel, which he owned. It was the place everyone in town got married. I grew up in the hotel.
The cockfight was raided by police, because even in a roughneck place like the Pa. coal mine area, in 1920, it was against the law.
The men who attended ran out the back door. By chance, a light snow was falling. The Roman Catholic priest heard about the raid, so local legend has it, and followed the tracks to various houses, where he basically extorted money from the participants. He used the money as a down payment on the local Roman Catholic church. (Being a typical ethnic town, it had 14,000 people, five Catholic churches, and 30 something taverns.)
So there you have my family's proud history.
I know that a particular well-known Goochlander raised fighting cocks at least in the late 80's. Don't know where or how they were fought though. He kept a man just for taking care of them...
Please accept my best wishes to your brother and your family for his speedy recovery.