Survey USA- Webb: 42%-Approve, 47%-Disapprove
By: thegools
Published On: 1/25/2007 11:21:52 PM
Survey USA has just brought out a poll showing a net of 5% more people with a negative approval of Senator Webb. 11% were undecided. The poll was conducted 1/12-1/14/07, or rather after he had been Senator for only 1.5 weeks.
It is not interesting to note that the republicans are the most negative, & that democrats have the highest approval. However, it does show that moderates independently show majority support of Virginia's junior Senator.
(In the same poll, John Warner had 62% Approval & 29% disapproval.)
For the link see:
http://www.surveyusa...
Comments
Very strange results. (Lowell - 1/25/2007 11:30:23 PM)
I mean, what did Webb do since the election that would have caused FEWER people to approve of him than the percentage of votes he got in the election? The "confrontation" with Bush where Webb said "that's between me and my boy?" But wouldn't that have helped with Democrats and Independents? I'm stumped.
When you're recently elected in a close election (Chris Guy - 1/25/2007 11:38:39 PM)
against an unpopular opponent, the numbers aren't going to be pretty. When Hillary Clinton took office in 2001, her approval was 38% in New York. Six years later, she's untouchable in her re-election contest.
Also, I want to see the numbers taken AFTER his speech Tues. night.
I hope like you that (thegools - 1/26/2007 12:24:52 AM)
the same is true for Webb. I have every reason to believe he will be untouchable in 6 years. I too would like to see his post State of the Union numbers.
Press like this can't hurt (thegools - 1/26/2007 12:26:18 AM)
This is from all the way over there in the Netherlands...talk about a speech causing ripples!!
http://www.atlanticf...
Hubris (Houdon - 1/26/2007 7:35:44 PM)
Careful with those predictions. Webb did a fine job on his speech, but relationship building will take more. Moderates who voted for Webb may disagree with the President's politics, but they respect the Office. Out here in ROVA, offenses against a president, even an unpopular one, aren't quickly forgotten.
"Hubris" (JPTERP - 1/26/2007 8:30:50 PM)
I agree with your statement concerning relationship building.
As far as "Hubris" is concerned though, I haven't seen any evidence of "excessive pride" yet. Of course, there may be some very different regional visions about who and what the president is.
In my view he is merely a man, first among citizens. The deference to his office is not absolute. If the president acts boorishly towards me, I would like to think that I wouldn't grovel on my knees like a peasant.
One read (JPTERP - 1/26/2007 11:27:59 AM)
I do think many Allenites are going to hold a grudge for a LONG time over the '06 race. Webb has 6 years to gain the people's trust in the 11%+ category.
Also, it is my belief that Allen's support was much more hardened than Webb's (it's the difference between a politician with 20+ years of relationship building and one with less than a year of work). A number of Webb voters were voting as much out of disdain for Allen as they were voting for Webb. Webb will have to win their trust over the next 6 years.
The larger question is: How accurate is the poll? SurveyUSA wasn't exactly dead-on with this most recent election.
It was the usual random phone call poll (Catzmaw - 1/26/2007 12:48:18 PM)
which means that once again it doesn't get the younger, hipper cell phone generation and only got the type of people who are likely to answer polls, meaning the older, whiter, and more conservative types. Survey USA is not noted for great accuracy, and I think this form of polling will become increasingly inaccurate as landlines into homes become increasingly passe.
This may be a stupid question but... (Terry85 - 1/26/2007 6:33:31 PM)
What this conducted nationally, or just among Virginians?
Just among Virginians. n/t (JPTERP - 1/26/2007 6:59:41 PM)