OK, you argue, but that was a long time ago. Why can't Colbert King "get over it" in the year 2006, when slavery is so far in the past? Well, as Faulkner said, "The past is never dead. It's not even past." In fact, Virginia's history of racial segregation and discrimination continued through much of the 20th century, definitely in Hargrove's lifetime. For instance, King points out:
*"Hargrove was 17 when the Virginia legislature passed a law requiring separate white and black waiting rooms at airports. Surely he must have heard about that."
*"When Hargrove was 29, Sen. Harry Byrd declared massive resistance to the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown decision desegregating public schools. Did he miss that?"
*"What did 31-year-old Hargrove think in 1958 when the General Assembly passed a series of laws to prevent school desegregation, including a measure forbidding state funds to be spent on integrated schools?"
It's amazing that Hargrove, who lived through all of this, can so casually tell black people to "get over it." Has he "gotten over" the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, which some would say caused the Democratic Party to lose the once "Solid South" for 40 years now?
And has Hargrove "gotten over" the fact that his ancestors were far more likely to have benefited from slavery than to have suffered from it? In fact, as King points out, "contrary to what Frank Hargrove and others may wish to believe, the state's legacy of segregation and discrimination in education and employment has harmed many black Virginians, depriving them of the tangible benefits enjoyed by their white counterparts." The point is, slavery isn't just a moral evil, it's also an economic system that greatly benefits some, while greatly harming many others.
And it's not just slavery, King points out, it's also more insidious systems like the segregation and institutionalized discrimination known as "Jim Crow" that prevailed in Virginia for nearly 100 years after the Civil War ended. King's concluding paragraph cuts to the core of this whole issue:
Which gets me to the source of his consternation: the legislative proposal for Virginia to issue an apology for slavery. I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. But if the effort must be made, why should the apology be limited to involuntary servitude? Why not include the sins of segregation and discrimination? Unlike slavery, those are sins that loads of Virginians, alive and well today, had something to do with.
Perhaps THAT is why the Frank Hargroves of the world want everyone to "get over" the past? Because in their own lives, the past was not only not "dead," it wasn't even past?
Lincoln warned the South in his Inaugural Address: "In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The government will not assail you.... You have no oath registered in Heaven to destroy the government, while I shall have the most solemn one to preserve, protect and defend it."
Lincoln thought secession illegal, and was willing to use force to defend Federal law and the Union. When Confederate batteries fired on Fort Sumter and forced its surrender, he called on the states for 75,000 volunteers. Four more slave states joined the Confederacy but four remained within the Union. The Civil War had begun.
My statement "thereby solving 2 issues" may have confused you.
Closer to home (mine) there's a pathetic letter to the editor today in the Roanoke Times
Said the letter writer:
I learned as a child that when someone digs up a dead dog, it stinks. Let's enjoy the history of Jamestown 2007 without an exhumation of any dead dogs.Unbelievable! I guess the letter writer subscribes to a sanitized version of our history, perhaps a Disney-like cartoon. Revisionism strikes another blow.
Without ensuring that our collective memory remembers, we (collectively speaking) are doomed to repeat old travesties.
I am personally ashamed that such Hargrove bigotry has reared its ugly head --again.
Closer to home (mine) there's a pathetic letter to the editor today in the Roanoke Times
Said the letter writer:
Unbelievable! I guess the letter writer subscribes to a sanitized version of our history, perhaps a Disney-like cartoon. Revisionism strikes another blow.
Unbelievable! I guess the letter writer subscribes to a sanitized version of our history, perhaps a Disney-like cartoon. Revisionism strikes another blow.
Without ensuring that our collective memory remembers, we (collectively speaking) are doomed to repeat old travesties.
I messed up, not once but TWICE, thus including my comment (from "Unbelievable ....")as if it were from the letter writer. One last time:
My words: I am personally ashamed that such Hargrove bigotry has reared its ugly head --again.
Closer to home (mine) there's a pathetic letter to the editor today in the Roanoke Times
Said the letter writer to the Roanoke Times,
"I learned as a child that when someone digs up a dead dog, it stinks. Let's enjoy the history of Jamestown 2007 without an exhumation of any dead dogs."
My words again:
Unbelievable! I guess the letter writer subscribes to a sanitized version of our history, perhaps a Disney-like cartoon. Revisionism strikes another blow.
Without ensuring that our collective memory remembers, we (collectively speaking) are doomed to repeat old travesties.
I use to have that power when I was an administrator, no longer do.
Peace
If we are to show pride in the accomplishments of our forefathers, we must, by the same token, be willing to express shame for their past wrongs. It is this logic of intergenerational continuity that led to many recent apologies for past wrongs, such as the Holy See's 1998 apology for an earlier generation of Catholics' passivity in the face of the Nazis' genocidal treatment of Jews. Such owning up to past wrongs is important for the moral health of a people, a fact of life that Mr. Hargrove is, sadly, oblivious to.
Yes, slavery was a long time ago. But as Kaine said in his speech here in Norfolk on MLK Day (also on my blog), it's not just about slavery - it is about the systematic way in which Virginia denied basic rights to its black citizens after slavery was abolished.
People like Hargrove don't understand White Privilege and how, to this day, it affects out economic system.