Virgil says that he sees nothing wrong with the letter - in fact he's "somewhat surprised" at the uproar. He also used the moment as a platform to bash the diversity visa program.
Also, when asked if he'd meet Rep.-Elect Ellison, he didn't even bother to be specific.
I hope[s] to meet with all of the new member of Congress ... and see them all from time to time, debating legislation, meeting in committees, seeing them at other events and occasion, and I look forward to seeing him as the same with all the other members of Congress.Great, so he demonizes Keith Ellison in a letter to hundreds of constituents (which now the whole world has seen), and Goode has no plans to actually sit with the man and get to know him? He hopes to just see him while they debate legislation? Wow.
The Fox interviewer, surprising, had some decent follow-ups. Including this question:
David Asman: So you do believe there're too many Middle Easterners here now?So, he made these comments without even knowing how many Muslims are in the country? Sheesh.(brief pause)
Rep. Virgil Goode: No, I GÇö I said there were GÇö and the Diversity Visa program needs to be ended. It shouldn't have been adopted to begin with, in my opinion.
Asman: But do you think there are too many Middle Easterners in the United States right now?
(brief pause)
Goode: Uh GÇö I'm not gonna say 'yes' or 'no' on that. I'd like to know the exact number. I don't have the exact numbers.
Earlier in the same day, Virgil Goode gave a press conference. on this issue. Virgil stood firm behind his letter, did not issue an apology, and kept on fearing Muslims. Also, last night, I heard a clip of him on WTOP - it sounded like Virgil reading the letter!? Did Virgil turn this from a "written comments" controversy to a "video/audio" controversy? Did he just enter George Allen territory? If anyone has a link, please leave it in the comments.
Thank you so much!
Steve
Thanks!
Steve
"We need to do away with diversity visas" that "increase the number of visas and immigrants from persons not from the European countries"
WOW.
I am pro-immigration as long as it does not harm education, healthcare, justice, and the labor market for American citizens. That is the only thing we should consider - not the "needs" of corporations to exploit people as a means of low-cost labor.
The question we must ask is how we can use immigration to better America. Not how we can discriminate against some religions. In the first wave of immigration in the early 1900s, we said "Give us your poor". They came - from all walks of life. There was a rise in crime - poverty and crime have a relationship. But the vast majority came to America in pursuit of the American dream. The system enabled them to move up the ladder and into the middle class.
Now, we see the masses coming but the goal is no longer the pursuit of the American dream. The goal is now based upon Corporation's desires for cheap labor. So we now have "temporary" programs - these programs aren't designed with the goal of creating future Americans but rather creating exploitable and indentured classes of labor. They have a permanent place in the lower-class; our very own "untouchables".
We have prisons filled with violent foreign criminals who aren't legally suppose to be in this country - they came to pursue serve the corporation's goal of cheap labor. They didn't become productive citizens, and they didn't leave because nobody forced the to. They have become a problem. Their children attend our schools; many of which have dads in prison and moms on welfare. In short, they are here on our dime - at a great cost - all to serve the goal of cheap labor.
As long as the goal is centered around corporations desire to exploit people, the system will work against creating American citizens who contribute to our society. It will create an underground group of people - because they are now illegal - and this underground class will expand because nobody in government wants to work against the GOAL OF CHEAP LABOR. Cheap for whom?
Why should we have immigration? What purpose should it serve? And what purpose does it currently serve? Does the purpose it currently serves match the purpose it should serve? These are the critical questions you should ask.
My solution to the immigration crises is simple: CHANGE THE GOAL!!! Make it about advancing America, not about corporate profits and cheap, exploitable labor.
Others, please?
Thanks!
Steve