The "Joyless" Republican Economy

By: Lowell
Published On: 12/5/2005 2:00:00 AM

Paul Krugman has an excellent column (as always) in today's New York Times.  It's called "The Joyless Economy," and it's about Americans being down on the economy even though unemployment is low and the gross domestic product is growing.  Unfortunately, you can't read Krugman's article without paying the New York Times for a subscription, so here's a synopsis with a couple short excerpts.

In sum, the reason we have a "joyless" economy for most Americans is that it's a Republican economy.  This is not a fluke, but an integral part of what it means to be "conservative."  To boil it down to its essence, in conservative economics the richest and most powerful get the most rewards (by far), while all other Americans get the "trickle down" table droppings.  That's a DIRECT RESULT of conservative economic and tax policies which favor investment income over wage income, corporations over individuals.  As Krugman writes:

Behind the disconnect between economic growth and family incomes lies the extremely lopsided nature of the economic recovery that officially began in late 2001. The growth in corporate profits has, as I said, been spectacular. Even after adjusting for inflation, profits have risen more than 50 percent since the last quarter of 2001. But real wage and salary income is up less than 7 percent.

There are some wealthy Americans who derive a large share of their income from dividends and capital gains on stocks, and therefore benefit more or less directly from soaring profits. But these people constitute a small minority. For everyone else the sluggish growth in wages is the real story. And much of the wage and salary growth that did take place happened at the high end, in the form of rising payments to executives and other elite employees. Average hourly earnings of nonsupervisory workers, adjusted for inflation, are lower now than when the recovery began.

So there you have it. Americans don't feel good about the economy because it hasn't been good for them. Never mind the G.D.P. numbers: most people are falling behind.

What is causing this?  Krugman says it's a "mystery," but in my view it's no mystery at all.  I would point to three factors as key.  First, health care coverage is a disaster in this country, and a source of great anxiety to millions of American families.  It's tough to feel great about your economic situation when you're one of nearly 46 million Americans - 1 in 6 - without health insurance at all, let alone the tens of millions more with inadequate or precarious health coverage. 

And let's not forget who's responsible for the fact that we don't have universal health care - a fundamental human right, by the way - in this country.  Remember the "Harry and Louise" ads back in 1993?  The ones that helped kill any chance for universal health care in this country?  Those were sponsored by industry groups and masterminded by their PR guru, Blair G. Childs, who has given large sums of money to Republican PACs and candidates.  Universal health care was also killed by a Republican-orchestrated media campaign, including daily rants by Rush Limbaugh to his tens of millions of listeners.  In the end, this coalition of Republicans and the health care industry killed any chance for passage of universal health care coverage in America for over a decade now.  That's reason #1 why Americans don't feel great about the economy.

Second, although GDP is rising and unemployment is low, median income is falling.  As Krugman points out, "Real median household income - the income of households in the middle of the income distribution, adjusted for inflation - fell for the fifth year in a row" in 2004, and "it's pretty clear that the results will be similar" for 2005.  This is Republican economics at work as well - the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.

Third, most Americans know that their jobs are insecure.  The recently announced layoffs of 30,000 auto workers by GM were a case in point.  ABC News ran the headline, "GM Layoffs Resonate Across U.S."  Exactly.  People aren't blind.  They feel it in their bones that their jobs are in danger of being outsourced or downsized at any time, so why should they be confident about their economic futures?  Quick answer:  they shouldn't be.  Oh, and not coincidentally, a big part of U.S. automakers' problems have to do with rising health care costs they must pay to their employees and retirees.  This adds an estimated $1,500 to the cost of building a car in America, putting U.S. auto manufacturers at "a significant disadvantage versus our foreign-based competitor," according to GM's CEO, Rick Waggoner. 

The bottom line is that most Americans today are "joyless" about the economy because for most of them, things aren't going particularly well under Republican economics.  Seriously, what's to be joyful about when you're forced to run faster on the treadmill all the time just to keep up, while worrying that you'll hurt yourself or even fall off the treadmill completely?  What I'd really love to see is a poll which looks at how the top 1%  - the "one America" that John Edwards speaks of so eloquently - are feeling these days, compared to the other 99% - "everybody else" - who are struggling to get by.  My guess is that the top 1% would be quite content, thank you.  The other 99%?  Well, they should be getting ready to express their displeasure and anxiety at the voting booths about 11 months from now.  Election Day 2006 could be another "joyless" day in America -- but for Republicans, for a change!


Comments



David: Yeah, the sit (Lowell - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
David: Yeah, the site appears to be dead right now.  I'd say try back in an hour or so...unless you're not in a humorous mood by that point! :)


I would do best humo (David Lang - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
I would do best humor blog. Lowell can you type the site out for me? I can't seem to get on.


i'd nominate raising (Steve Nelson - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
i'd nominate raisingkaine as the Best conservative blog, but i'm just guessing that they'd throw it out. Plus i can't get their Vote now link to work.


Lola: What a lame r (Lowell - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
Lola:  What a lame response, but as you say, no surprises.  It's b.s. like this which is exactly why Tom Davis has got to go.  Fortunately, he's got a challenger - Andrew Hurst.  We'll see what happens, but I personally plan to do anything and everything I can to help defeat Tom Davis in November 2006.  It's time to turn Fairfax (and Prince William) "blue" not just for Governor (and County Board, etc.), but also for Congress!


Matt: It's a poin (Mary - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
Matt:

It's a point apart from my main response (that consumer costs have risen under the Bush administration), but actually, if you want to go with gas prices, there is very little correlation with Katrina.  Bush came to power January 20, 2001.  According to DOE, the average gallon of gas cost $1.456 on 1/22/05.  Katrina occured 8/29/05, when cost had already risen to $2.581/gal. Prices did make a temporary rise after Katrina (the temporary impact probably indicatory of mismanagement issues), but then fell.  Last national average was $2.124.  Overall, that's a 70% net gain, with Katrina having little effect. 

Regardless of this economic minutae, ordinary taxpayers are suffering even when in gross terms the economy is growing.  If, as you say you are not rich, but you are a Republican, then I would really respectfully like to know what the appeal this has for you.  Why do voters like you would prefer having the quick apeal of a tax cut while watching its consequenses--higher costs and delayed financial obligations--cut away at your net worth?



I thought I would sh (Maria - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
I thought I would share with you the response I've just received from Congressman Davis.  In record time, too!!  No surprises here, just more of the same.

December 5, 2005

Ms. ....

Thank you for contacting me to share your concerns with the budget reconciliation process.  I appreciate hearing from you on this issue.

It remains to be seen what tax cut extensions might ultimately be included in the budget reconciliation process.  However, we must remember that the fact that entitlement spending and programs to help low income families are made possible by economic growth.  Thus, it is important that we review all proposed tax extenders, bearing in mind not only the amount of money that they might “cost,” but also their stimulative effects and how much revenue they might actually bring in due to resultant positive economic growth.

Again, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with me, and I hope you will continue to keep me informed of issues of importance to you in the future. 

Sincerely,

Tom Davis
Member of Congress



Don't be fooled that (Steve Nelson - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
Don't be fooled that the GDP is rising. The reason it's going up is the US Gov't is borrowing money and dumping it into the economy.

Let me give you an example. If you have a $40,000 a year salary and a $10,000 credit card limit. On year one you spend your whole salary and max out your credit. Basically you've spent $50,000. Now the next year you get a raise to $42,000, but your credit card is maxed out. The second year you can only spend $42,000 and it *looks* like you actually made less money.

Check out the GDP minus Deficit growth for the last 50 years



Matt: I'm talking a (Lowell - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
Matt:  I'm talking about structural problems, not temporary spikes like gas prices and heating oil costs.  The problems with the American economy center on the fact that the rich have great health care and a great life, while most other people are struggling and insecure about their health care and job prospects.  There's also education, which is critical to the potential for economic success in the economy today as well as to the chances for upward mobility.  I would argue strongly that conservative Republicans for years have fought against (or not adequately supported) many of the foundation blocks - universal health care, excellent public education, progressive taxation, investment in basic infrastructure -- necessary for our nation and its people to succed.  The real question is why so many Americans vote against their own interests.  For some answers, I recommend that you read "What's the Matter with Kansas?" if you haven't already.


Interesting article, (Mary - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
Interesting article, Lowell.  Statistics show that while the economy is growing, consumer confidence is sinking. This commentary points to many of the reasons, although anyone can see the circumstances in very real terms in their own home budget--rising fuel and housing costs jump quickly to mind.

The hardest part is that voters just do not seem to vote for their economic interests.  We've come a long ways down from the prosperity of the Clinton years, but populistic sentiment fails to appreciate that.  It just leaves me wondering...



Lola, I'll do as you (Teddy - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
Lola, I'll do as you suggested. Mr. Davis is giving evidence of trying to move to the center of late. You are correct.

Do you suppose one reason we're being drummed up about illegal immigrants is, once again, to distract us with an emotional issue so the economic issues can be ignored? Of course, Bush always has the Big Scare of terrorist attack he can trot out, oddly enough simultaneously with rants about "victory" in Iraq (never mind the growing civil war we've created in Mesopotamia--- more Iraqis have been trained overnight).



The members of the H (Maria - 4/4/2006 11:27:48 PM)
The members of the House are coming back tomorrow after the Thanksgiving holiday.  The first item on the agenda, according to C-Span, will be tax cut extensions (specifically, lower rate on capital gains and dividends that tend to favor the wealthy.)  WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN OR CONGRESWOMAN TODAY!  Let them know you are watching.  Let them know you find these policies scandalous. This is the link: http://www.house.gov/house/MemStateSearch.shtml#VA.  I have already sent an email to my Congressman, Tom Davis. My guess is that he will be more inclined to read my letter now, after the overwhelming Democratic victory in his District.