These are the people I now hate--these people who seek to control our national security. The best of them are misinformed. The rest of them are liars.That explains a lot, doesn't it?So I intend to vote on Nov. 7. If I have to, I'll crawl over broken glass to do it. And this year I'm voting a straight Republican ticket right down to dog catcher, because I've had it. I'm fed up with the deranged, lying left. They've infected me. I'm now a hater, too.
(UPDATE: If you'd like to learn to write such emotional and riveting hate mail, maybe Paul could teach you sometime!)
(UPDATE: And what kind of a paper would actually publish such hate mail? Why, a paper that endorses GFA because - and I'm not joking - "George Allen's warm body is needed to help Republicans maintain control of the Senate and install federal judges who will prevent and cure the disease of judicial activism that mocks elected government. If the GOP hangs onto the Senate on Nov. 7, it likely will be by a whisker. Friends of the Constitution can't afford to see Mr. Allen sheared off." Vote Allen to keep the GOP majority - that's the argument of the Free Lance Star. Impressive, isn't it?)
That obviously wasn't the letter writer's intent, but it was a strange transition.
Also, it's rare that stating ones credentials would immediately undermine ones credibility; however, that is the effect of "I wrote foreign-policy speeches for the Bush White House from 2003-2005".
What?
Ummmmmmm...who writes wierd shit again? ;)
I really can't believe that someone who writes like that could have a job as a presidential speechwriter. Maybe he's had a breakdown?
I'm sure you won't be surprised that this paper endorsed Allen.
I'd like to think Mr. Burgess was under the influence of narcotics when he wrote that. Disturbing to say the least...
"We're not backing George Allen because of his intellect, his character, or credentials, we are backing him because he has a quality possesed by 100% of mammals."
The other red flag is "judicial activism". People who use this term in a strictly partisan sense, don't understand constitutional law, or for that matter, the Constitution.
OMG! More evidence on how truly incompetent this administration is!
What upsets me more is my own dented pride... :) I thought my (written) English was pretty good for a foreigner but I obiously could never qualify as a speech-writer, even for the chimperor. After 2000, I became interested in politics. After 2004, I began to refer to myself as "rabid liberal"...
How could I??? How could I *possibly* have missed the elegance of the "livid left" and "rabid right" dichotomy??? It's as if my mind was trying to be bipartisan...
Hopefully, this will be the last administration to promote rank amateurs to the level of creating and selling its policy.
Mr. Webb, on the other hand, has remained senatorial throughout and has stuck to his issues message. That alone gives me plenty of reason to vote for Jim Webb. But, I also know he has solid ideas for veterans, healthcare, the crisis in Iraq (foreign policy in general), regional transportation and ethics in government. I have confidence that Jim Webb will be a voice for change in Washington. I think he will help ensure Virginia remains a safe and prosperous place for families to live and work. He will keep Virginia moving forward.
This voter thanks you for your willingness to again serve in government, Mr. Webb!
Maybe this slime ball is still writing for Frist and Bush.