Push-Polling is B-A-C-K! And It "Ain't Pretty"

By: KathyinBlacksburg
Published On: 10/15/2006 5:52:35 PM

George Allen Can't Win By Playing Fair.  So he and his campaign just make stuff up. Here we go again. 

A company called "Q Search" (which may or may not exist) called just a few moments ago and immediately it was discernible that the poll wasn't professional.  Thee's a new push poll out there.  And it is nasty.
First, one had to pick the one issue that's most important.  That's really artificial.  Voters don't  vote based on just one issue.  I was  also supposed to pick one issue from a list loaded with buzzwords Allen often uses (e.g. "tax relief"). 

Some questions had response options not normally used by professionals. There were numerous either/or questions.  But it wasn't till the end of the "survey" that things got downright laughable--if they weren't so infuriating:  Would you be more or less likely to vote for Webb if you "knew"... and then there was a list of numerous falehoods: falsely stating that the Webb campaign instigated the querry by a journalist about Allen's background, falsely stating that Webb would raise taxes on families with children and on most Americans, falsely stating that he'd reinstitute the "death tax" for most Americans, that Webb had something to do with Tailhook; and on and on.  There is no way the WEbb campaing or any Democratic group would pitch such a loaded, nasty survey. 

At one point I had to cover my mouth to keep from laughing into the phone.  The questions were so blatantly false, I had to say, "I reject the premise.  Your information is facutally incorrect" to all of them.  At the end I asked whom the caller really worked for.  "It's patently obvious," I said, "that this is a push poll."

But I wonder: How many voters will be able to refute all the falsehoods.  Fake polls should be banned.  And no one, neither Republican nor Democrat, should ever do it.  I said that when  Dems did it previously and I say it now.  Let's have honest electioneering, not fraudulent tactics.


Comments



Maybe this? (Kathy Gerber - 10/15/2006 8:58:24 PM)
http://www.qsearchon...


A little more on Q-Search (Kathy Gerber - 10/15/2006 9:35:15 PM)
http://www.qsearchon...

It would be great if someone catches this one to get a recording.

At the very least, take notes and ask the caller if they are in Wappingers Falls, NY.

If so, perhaps some NY progressives are up for informational picketing.



Please try (Eric - 10/16/2006 12:35:40 PM)
to get these things recorded.  The more proof we have the better we can fight against this crap.


Correlation (Admiral - 10/16/2006 6:38:30 PM)
This is especially interesting because there was a push poll executed in the NY19 district in which Q search is located, against Democratic challenger John Hall.  I don't know if the NY incident is perpetrated by Q-search, but the correlation is interesting.


Isn't this how John McCain lost S. Carolina? (Andrea Chamblee - 10/15/2006 11:30:10 PM)
Karl Rove instigated a poll that asked how they would feel about a candidate who had a bi-racial child by a black prostitute? (McCain of course adopted a boy from Indonesia, but people who heard about the poll would leap to the Rove-ian conclusion.)


It is amazing (Arturo - 10/16/2006 8:02:23 AM)
These push polls show how amazingly naive many voters are.  And how this stuff works in a country like the U.S.  We can learn a lot from people in many "developing" countries who are much better informed about their candidates, despite the stories on the contrary (propaganda) in the U.S. media.