I believe the proper way to honor those who lost their lives on that day; and to honor those who have sacrificed their lives since that day--is simply to keep the focus on a day of rememberance.
I believe Libertas at Perseverando points things in the right direction. For those of you who have not seen his tribute, I recommend checking it out . . .
http://perseverando....
One thing that I liked about Libertas's post was simply the story about that day.
With the benefit of 5 years hindsight--what are people's thoughts about that day's events? What do people remember?
For me at least, it's helpful to hear reflections--it helps to put the day's events in some context.
What do you think about this approach? Good? Bad? Indifferent?
The Bush administration and its radical followers have wrongfully politicized 9-11. They are pitching all fear all the time. The have rewritten hsitory. Are to say nothing? I think we should blog the media lie fest and set the record straight.
I agree with you on one thing, I don't plan to talk about George Allen tomorrow. But I certainly will not plege away my right to defend against revisionism. IMHO, with the exception of those who worked toward preventing it, or worked for candidates opposing it, Democrats rolled over and played dead when Bush trotted out this wrongful war. We can't make that mistake again.
If others feel that exposing the hypocrisy of the Bush administration is an appropriate memorial on 9/11 so be it.
Different strokes for different folks.