Frank slams davis for Using Taxpayer Dollars to campaign through his abuse of the frank mailing privilege.
Here are some great excerpts from the letter.
I called and wrote Congressman Davis for the total cost. All I got was stonewalling even though by law such information is public. Why does the Congressman+óGé¼Gäós office refuse to divulge the total cost? Since the campaign piece is glossy and on stiff cardboard paper, the cost is quite substantial to prepare, publish and mail to constituents in the 11th Congressional district that number in the tens of thousands (registered voters total 288,535).
Overburdened taxpayers should not be required to pay for any incumbent material particularly during an election year. That substantial taxpayer money would be better used to help, for example, needy children in our schools and save babies born prematurely instead of enhancing the election chances of any incumbent.
Keep that in mind when you go to the polls in November.
It seems that Andy might be pushing the right buttons here, having former REPUBLICAN elected officials publicly supporting Democrats is a great step.
But whether or not it makes a difference will depend coverage - so far things a fairly quiet. The Allen slur is still taking headlines, leaving no room for this one. I'm not sure it would be front page anyway, but for now there's no room.
We, the American people, have been treated to headlines of corruption and incompetence from the Republicans in power for a few years now. And any questionable behavior by Davis will be quickly associated with the mass of misdeeds leading to "they're all corrupt, even Davis". Which plays right into Hurst's campaign. So a little publicity on this could go a long way. Let's hope we get it.
Formal complaints of misconduct, backed by someone in the accussed own party.
Now if only WaPo wasn't so freaking in love with Davis, maybe it's time for another Letter to The Editor campaign, such as the one that led to this article, Now, a Word About the Invigorated 11th District Democrats
Full body armor for a soldier in Iraq costs $1,585 each. He could have bought body armor for more than 107 soldiers with that money.
I'd vote for the body armor.
While catching up on today's RK I heard the distinct howl and hacking noise my cat makes before dislodging a very juicy hairball. So, I grabed a closest junk paper I could find and shoved it under her - just in time to catch that nasty thing and keep the floor clean.
Turns out it was the Davis mailer. Thanks Tom - I guess I owe you one. But you're not getting my vote.