The ridiculousness of Allen's so-called apology

By: Rob
Published On: 8/25/2006 9:46:48 AM

Aside from the fact that it took almost two weeks for him to actually apologize to his victim, I'll let Ana Marie Cox take it from here on why Allen's latest turn on the M-word scandal is baloney:
First, do NOT "dismiss...the issue with an expletive and insist...the senator has 'nothing to apologize for.'" Second, do NOT try to "explain" the offensive remark (He said the word sounds similar to "mohawk," a term that his campaign staff had nicknamed Sidarth because of his haircut.). Third, do NOT offer a SECOND, possibly more offensive, explanation after the first one proves inadequate. Fourth do NOT leak a campaign memo that blames the media for the offensive remark. Lastly, do NOT wait a week to actually apologize [actually almost two weeks]. Oh, and do NOT be an idiot.

Allen has been apologizing to "those who were offended" ever since he realized they were offended, of course, though apparently he had to watch the media coverage in order to realize that the person he called "macaca" was offended:

+óGé¼+ôHe took the blame for saying them, and he said he didn+óGé¼Gäót realize how offended I was until he heard my comments from the media.+óGé¼-¥
All of which makes one wonder about this "attempt" at apologizing:
"I just want to say, from the deepest part of my heart, I am sorry and I will do better."
If it's coming form his "heart" now, maybe those other apologies were coming from the other end.
Her rundown puts his apology in the proper context - this lead-up and delay in apologizing reveals the lack of sincerity in Allen's latest try.

Comments



Daily Progress, 8/24 (lwumom - 8/25/2006 10:18:41 AM)
Here's the link:

http://www.dailyprog...

I'm actually kinda surprised that the "Regress," as the locals call it, has continued with the story.  They're not normally known as the "liberal" media.



And a More Serious Review from "Media Matters" (bb10 - 8/25/2006 1:18:54 PM)
Media Matters, the news-monitoring service, has a good, detailed analysis today (Friday) of the various "explanations" that the Allen campaign and right-wing apologists have offered. The analysis focuses on what "Washington Times" editorial page editor Tony Blankley said on the Wed. edition of Hardball with Chris Matthews.

It's kind of funny/sad reading the compilation of the many explanations that have been thrown out there by the Allen campaign.

The piece is here.