Please see Rush Limbaugh's article below titled "It's Time To Challenge Democrats' Patriotism." Limbaugh is getting more desperate as the election is getting closer and he is making some stupid mistakes!
These stupid comments can help to take away some of Rush Limbaugh's PERCEIVED credibility if enough impressionable people and the media see this and are aware of it which is very important in my opinion considering how much media influence that Limbaugh has:
http://securingameri...
The GOP is nationalizing Ned Lamont's CT primary all over the country now:
"One of the nip-and-tuck Senate races this year is in Missouri, and backers of Sen. Jim Talent are preparing an attack on his opponent, State Auditor Claire McCaskill, that is emblematic of the sort that will be seen all over the country within 24 hours. "Does Claire McCaskill support the wishes of the angry left by endorsing Ned Lamont's candidacy or will she support the man who was chosen by Al Gore as the Democrat's 2000 nominee for Vice President?" the National Republican Senatorial Committee asks in a statement that will force McCaskill to talk about messy party business instead of her favored issues of government accountability and affordable health care.
The NRSC blasted similar releases into 10 states."
Rush Limbaugh has also tried to nationalize Ned Lamont's CT primary victory:
Kook Lamont Win Doesn't Mean What
McGovernized Democrats Think It Does
August 9, 2006
Democrats need to turn things around and nationalize Rush Limbaugh saying below "I am going to challenge the patriotism of people who disagree with him because the people that disagree with him want to lose."
The Democratic leadership and Democratic candidates need to make ALL Neocon GOP Bush rubber stamp candidates take a "Yes" or "No" stand on Rush Limbaugh's comments because the RNC is using Limbaugh in an official capacity:
CALL TALK RADIO STATIONS
The Rush Limbaugh Show
Rush Limbaugh
1-800-282-2882
If Rush Limbaugh and the GOP leadership can nationalize Ned Lamont, John Kerry, Howard Dean, and whoever else they want to; then why can't Democrats nationalize Limbaugh's stupid and outrageous comments when he is actually being used in an official capacity by the RNC on their website?
This is especially true of George Allen in Virginia because Rush Limbaugh on at least three different occasions has expressed his support to see Allen become President in 2008 which is very well documented:
Rush Limbaugh gives us the lowdown
Q. Who do you think will be the GOP's candidate for president in 2008?
A. This is the first year I can remember, the first election that there's no acknowledged frontrunner. It's wide open. A number of people think it will be McCain, I hope not. I like George Allen.
Golf-loving radio king
Rush Limbaugh hits it
right on Clooney,
Clinton and Wie
Q: Who's your Republican candidate in 2008?
A: Right now I like George Allen. I anticipate the John McCain and Rudy Giuliani talk will die down in the end. But it's wide open. Republicans who win elections are conservatives, though.
Rush Limbaugh Gives Sean a Rare Interview
Wednesday, October 19, 2005
"It's early. The danger with mentioning names is that you hurt the feelings of people that you leave out. I'm going to leave some people out because of time constraints, but when I hear George Allen speak, there's a part of me, "Yes, rah-rah."
Rush Limbaugh also tried to defend George Allen last week from his insulting comments:
Drive-By Media Savages Allen, Ignores Dems
August 16, 2006
Jim Webb has a terrific opportunity to make George Allen take a firm "Yes" or "No" stand on Rush Limbaugh's comments! That is especially true since Allen has been very complimentary of Limbaugh which is very well documented:
by Judson Cox
An Interview with Senator George Allen
January 07, 2006 02:20 PM EST
NCC: "Rush Limbaugh has repeatedly stated that your political speeches are inspirational and remind him of President Reagan; what is your reaction to his praise?
That is as high a compliment as I can envision. I like Rush Limbaugh - he is an influential and smart leader. He is also entertaining. I find it relaxing to listen to Rush. It is a very high compliment to be mentioned by Rush, and to be mentioned with my political hero, the man who motivated me to get involved in politics, President Reagan. I was in law school, at the University of Virginia, when they asked me to become chairman of Young Americans for Reagan, which was my first experience in organized politics. Plus, Rush knows sports, and he knows football."
Please forward this on so that all GOP Neocon Bush rubber stamp candidates who Rush Limbaugh is supporting will have to take a "Yes" or "No" stand on Limbaugh's outrageous and extreme comments below by his openly challenging the patriotism of those who disagree with him!
It is about time that the RNC and GOP Neocon candidates get a taste of their own medicine when this can be fairly nationalized because Rush Limbaugh is supporting many Neocon GOP candidates (George Allen being among the top of those candidates) and he is being used in an official capacity by the RNC on their website!
Mitch Dworkin
http://www.securinga...
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program:
An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda which will help our local candidates to win their races!
http://securingameri...
Gen. Wes Clark's endorsement of Jim Webb against George Allen
--------------------
It's Time To Challenge Democrats' Patriotism
August 21, 2006
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Let's just get to the meat and potatoes of this press conference. This is about Iraq, and this is the president saying that he has no intention of leaving before the job is done. And we're not leaving Iraq while he is president. The answer comes from a question, an unidentified reporter. "You mentioned the campaigns earlier. Do you agree with those in your party, including vice president, who said or implied that Democratic voters emboldened Al-Qaeda types by choosing Ned Lament over Joe Lieberman and then it's a message that how Americans vote will send messages to terrorists abroad?"
THE PRESIDENT: Leaving before the job would be done would send a message that America really is no longer engaged nor cares about the form of governments in the Middle East. Leaving before the job was done would be to send a signal to our troops that the sacrifices they made were not worth it. Leaving before the job is done would be a disaster. And that's what we're saying. I will never question the patriotism of somebody who disagrees with me. This has nothing to do with patriotism. It has everything to do with understanding the world in which we live.
RUSH: I want to respectfully disagree with the president on the last part of what he said. I am going to challenge the patriotism of people who disagree with him because the people that disagree with him want to lose. And I want ask you people a question. What is patriotic about losing? How come we can't question of patriotism of people who are actively engaged in sabotaging victory over this enemy? Why can't we question their patriotism? We most certainly can, we most certainly should. Damn straight. I'm tired of pussyfooting around this so that we don't hurt anybody's feelings and challenge their patriotism, we've said for all these years, I'm not challenging your patriotism, I'm just challenging your judgment. Well, hell's bells. It's about time we do challenge their patriotism. The far-left fringe in this country is actively seeking our defeat. A wacko judge in Michigan is actively seeking our defeat. Jimmy Carter, actively seeking our defeat. Bill Clinton, John Kerry and Al Gore may as well be seeking our defeat. So should Ned Lament.
Why can't we simply say what is patriotic about seeking our defeat? Seems to me we should be saying that. Their judgment is skewed, their judgment is crazy. The president says, understanding the world in which we live, who knows whether they understand the world in which we live. We can't afford to take time to figure that out. We don't have the time to worry whether they understand -- just like we don't have time to figure out why they hate us. We don't have time to figure that out. That's irrelevant to the mission if you want to use that word or to the cause. So let it ring out from the mountaintops here at the EIB Limbaugh Institute. We do question their patriotism. If they want us to lose, what the hell is it about patriotism that makes us want to lose? What is patriotic about wanting to lose against this enemy? Somebody explain that to me, and if you can, then I might revise and extend my remarks. The president then continued with this answer -- (interruption) You're staring at me with wide open eyes and you're not blinking.
What does that mean, Mr. Snerdley? What does that mean? Well, Mr. Snerdley says I never crossed the line before. Well, we're crossing a lot of new lines here because the Democrats keep moving the line, and sometimes you gotta cross it. If they keep moving the line and we haven't moved anywhere, we gotta cross it to get to 'em. They keep backing up -- would you tell me where I'm wrong? Why can't we question the patriotism of people who actively seek a loss? They want to cut-and-run? What is that? It's a loss. They want to pull out. They don't want to continue the war on terror. They're running a whole presidential campaign in '08 based on it, a midterm campaign in '06 based on it. Why can't we question their patriotism as well as questioning their judgment? Here's the president continued with these remarks.
THE PRESIDENT: It's like the other day I was critical of those who heralded the federal judge's opinion about the terrorist surveillance program. I thought it was a terrible opinion. Those who heralded the decision not to give law enforcement the tools necessary to protect the American people simply don't see the world the way we do.
RUSH: Stop the tape. Is that right? Do they not see the world the way we do or do they see the world the way we do but they see Bush as worse than those guys? Does their Bush hatred cause them to have descended into the first stages of literal, utter madness? Is Bush so much the enemy that they do not see the world the way we do, or do they see it the way we do but they'll fix it later on? I don't know the answer to this. All I know is, they're actively sabotaging our effort to defeat this enemy. And whether they see the world we do or not is irrelevant to me. It is the actions they take based on whatever their motivations are that need to be addressed, and they're clearly taking actions such as this judge in the Eastern District of Michigan, taking actions that hamper and harm the ability if these decisions are actually enshrined in law. Doubt that they will be, but they are still saying these things, making these judgments, rendering these decisions that are designed to hamper the effort in this war. Maybe they don't see it's a war. Could well be they don't think this is a war. "Ah, 9/11, ah, just one of these things that isn't going to happen again. It isn't going to happen again and so we don't need to go out and pretend that it will and do what we have to do to defend against it." But they're dangerous in the sense that they don't see it and want to construct a pre-9/11 world for whatever reason. Let's resume this bite.
THE PRESIDENT: They see these as kind of isolated incidents. These aren't isolated incidents. They're tied together. There is a global war going on. And, you know, somebody said, "Well, this is law enforcement." No, this isn't law enforcement, in my judgment. This is a global war on terror.
RUSH: That's a little swipe at Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter the most recent idiot to say that this is a law enforcement problem. And of course John Kerry has long said that it was a law enforcement problem, and many of the libs, the Clinton administration viewed it as a law enforcement problem. But he's right. These are not isolated, episodic events. They're tied together. There is a global war going on. I think the line of the speech was, "We are not getting out of Iraq as long as I'm president." Here's the next bite. The president added this to the previous remarks.
THE PRESIDENT: There are a lot of people in the Democrat Party who believe that the best course of action is to leave Iraq before the job is done, period. And they're wrong. And the American people have got to understand the consequence of leaving Iraq before the job is done. We're not going to leave Iraq before the job is done and we'll complete the mission in Iraq. I can't tell you exactly when it's going to be done but I do know that it's important for us to support the Iraqi people who have shown incredible courage and their desire to live in a free society. And if we ever give up the desire to help people who live in freedom, we will have lost our soul as a nation, as far as I'm concerned.
RUSH: He believes this democracy project stuff, and I do, too. There's no question, the only thing I'd like to see added to it is a incredible projection of our power. I would love to see a massive projection of our power because to defeat these people in Iraq once and for all, because it would be easier to establish this democratic regime that is our objective absent as many terrorist threats, insurgency actions and so forth and so on. But that's just me. In this one Bush boils the campaign down to two issues. Democrats want to cut-and-run in Iraq and raise your taxes. He was asked here a question, if you were campaigning, what would you campaign on?
THE PRESIDENT: There's a fundamental difference between many of the Democrats and my party, and that is they want to leave before the job is completed in Iraq. This is a global war on terror. I repeat what our major general said in the region. He said if we withdraw before the job is done the enemy will follow us here. I strongly agree with that. I'd be telling people that the Democrats will raise your taxes. I'd be reminding people there's a philosophical difference between those who want to raise taxes and have the government spend the money, and of those of us who say you get to spend the money the way you see fit. It's your money.
RUSH: There you go.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
The president also announced today that we're sending $230 million of aid to help rebuild damaged areas of Beirut and other parts of Lebanon, and I must confess when I heard him reading off this list at the beginning of the press conference, I thought I was getting a Katrina type laundry list of things and it was a little disturbing. I said Iranians are sending arms in via Syria, the Israelis are trying to stop that, and they have been successful on a couple of occasions. I said why are we doing this? Trying to prove to these people -- we can't buy their affection. They're militant Islamists. It isn't going to work. But the administration is being consistent.
I mentioned to you from the first days of the Israel-Hezbo war that the administration kept talking about the government of Lebanon, must step up, the government of Lebanon must remain whole and functioning. The administration has a desire that Lebanon remain a democracy, become a full-fledged functioning democracy, and that's why the aid. A lot of people look at all this, the democracy project in Iraq as a failure, it's going nowhere, gee -- now we're trying it in Lebanon, we're going to pay 'em -- and people have a negative attitude about it. But may as well get used to it, folks, the president is going to stick with this. This is an identifying characteristic of his own soul and his policy here at the same time.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
(Reuters: Bush says peacekeepers needed urgently in Lebanon)
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.