Conservative GOPers who favor teaching theories questioning evolution lost their majority 8/1 as GOP nominations for two seats on the Kansas Board of Education went instead to moderates who favor teaching evolution.
Here's a thought: was this vote an ironic, quasi-metaphorical example of evolution itself? In other words, was the vote in Kansas Tuesday in part a realization that being against basic science - evolution is, indeed, one of science's main building blocks - is not "adaptive" in the early 21st century? That failing to teach children the fundamentals - no pun intended - of science is essential if they have any hope of competing against the Chinas and Indias of the world? As one Democratic school board candidate had said last November:
...I believe the children of Kansas deserve a Board of Education that will prepare them to successfully compete in a global economy rather than a Board that is interested only in advancing their own personal ideology. Not only is the quality of our children+óGé¼Gäós education at stake, but also the long-term economic growth of the State of Kansas if we continue down a path where the personal beliefs of a Board+óGé¼Gäós Radical Right attempt to suppress the search for knowledge and understanding.
Preparing to compete in the global economy; is that something like "survival of the fittest?" And is THAT something like what Darwin was talking about when he developed his great scientific Theory of Evolution back in the 19th century? So why in God's name - ok, pun intended this time; ha ha - are we still fighting over this in the early 21st century? Is Kansas - and, more broadly, America - evolving or moving backwards into ignorance and superstition? Will Kansas - and, more broadly, America - make the decision, once and for all, to adapt to the world's current challenges? Or will we, as a nation, bury our heads in the sand, as even the ostrich does NOT do in real life?
Lowell Feld is Netroots Coordinator for the Jim Webb for US Senate Campaign. The ideas expressed here belong to Lowell Feld alone, and do not necessarily represent those of Jim Webb, his advisors, staff, or supporters.
Nick
One more plug -- for those of you who enjoy reading about the evolution/ID controversy from the perspective of a biologist you'll find http://scienceblogs.... highly entertaining. He also writes about lots of slimy things that live in the deep. No, not George Allen and Tom Davis. Cephalopods!