Sad to say, but the problems we're seeing in Afghanistan right now are a direct result of the Bush Administration's incompetence in running two - or three, depending on how you count them - wars at once. In October 2004, the Washington Post ran a detailed analysis of the Bush strategy in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the "war on terror" in general. The article directly addresses the costs to Afghanistan and the "war on terror" of the Bush Administration's decision to go to war in Iraq:
These elite forces, along with the battlefield intelligence technology of Predator and Global Hawk drone aircraft, were the scarcest tools of the hunt for jihadists along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. With Bush's shift of focus to Iraq, the special mission units called most of their troops home to prepare for a new set of high-value targets in Baghdad."There is a direct consequence for us having taken these guys out prematurely," said Leverett, who then worked as senior director for Middle Eastern affairs on Bush's NSC staff. "There were people on the staff level raising questions about what that meant for getting al Qaeda, for creating an Afghan security and intelligence service [to help combat jihadists]. Those questions didn't get above staff level, because clearly there had been a strategic decision taken."
A "strategic decision," in other words, to take out Saddam Hussein, who had no weapons of mass destruction and no ties to the "war on terror," instead of finishing Job #1 in Afghanistan. This represented bad judgement at the minimum, total incompetence at the maximum. We witnessed the results of the Bush obsession with Saddam at Tora Bora in late 2001, where Osama Bin Laden escaped. And we are witnessing the results again today in Kabul, where we have never had sufficient forces to secure the country and to complete the mission.
Mission accomplished, as Bush said three years ago? Not in Iraq. Not in Afghanistan. And not in the "war on terror." Heck of a job, Rummy - and Cheney, and Bushie, and those who vote with Dubya 97% of the time, like George Allen.