Since he joined the race for the US Senate, Harris Miller has been dreaming of a moment, a perfect moment for a perfect political maneuver.
In Harris Miller's dream, he has won the Democratic nomination and is running against George Allen for the US Senate. Allen is reliably nationalistic, and therefore, there would inevitably come a time when Allen would insinuate that Harris Miller is unfit for the US Senate, because he's Jewish. Would Allen use those words? Maybe, maybe not. It wouldn't matter. As long as he could imply Anti-Semitism, Miller dreams, he would be able to use it as a club with which beat Allen in to submission and thus gain his rightful place in the US Senate.
Jim Webb isn't only George Allen's worst nightmare, he's also Harris Miller's. Before Jim Webb got in to the Senate race, Harris Miller hoped and dreamed that he could use anti-Semitism against Allen. Now, facing Jim Webb's local, statewide, and national upswell of support, it looks like Miller has gone and shot his wad.
Today, Alice Marshall has a nefarious, and miserable attack up on her blog, not against George Allen, but against Jim Webb.
Her headline reads:
Did Webb play the anti-Semitic card?
In her article, she claims to be able to read Jim Webb's mind and between the lines. What does she find? Harris Miller's wet dream.
While I cannot know, I think Webb knew precisely what he was doing. He cannot say "My opponent is Jewish" in the 21st century, so he has to find a way to remind those who would care. This was his way of doing it.
Unfortunately for her, Jim Webb's quote, that Harris Miller is the "Anti-Christ of Outsourcing", is a close paraphrase from an InfoWeek article by Paul McDougall from January 9, 2006. You can read it [here].
Harris Miller, aka the Antichrist if you're an unemployed IT worker, is gearing up for a Senate run as--a Democrat?
Alice Marshall's claim of anti-Semitism, is weak, pitiful, and despicable. I personally demand a retraction and an apology and until she posts one, she will remain, in my eyes, a failure and a coward.
Jerry Kilgore used Hitler in his ads, and he lost. Alice Marshall is one of a meager handful of Miller supporters in the Virginia blogosphere. If Miller opened this line of attack through Alice Marshall, it is the last and least of a string of cowardly moves from Miller. If she miraculously decided to invoke Harris Miller's dream strategy in this contested primary season, she is as clairvoyant as she is insipid.
Did Miller unleash his secret weapon too soon, or did Alice Marshall decide that since invoking Hitler worked so well for Kilgore, she'd invoke anti-Semitism for Miller?
A personal note to Alice Marshall:
Cowards lose, Alice. Kilgore did, and you're not helping Harris Miller with this pitiful piece of cowardice one little bit.
[UPDATE by Lowell: Alice needs to apologize for this smear. In addition, the FCDC needs to take action and stop condoning this behavior. At the minimum, Alice should be banned from writing for FCDC's blog. Today, Alice Marshall has gone way, WAY over the line into the realm of dsspicable, outrageous and completely unacceptable. Oh, by the way, I was raised Jewish and Jim Webb is in no way, shape or form anti-Semitic. How Jewish are you, Alice?]
I certainly don't want to turn this into a battle; I think I have met you, and I am sure we got along well. If not, then I am sure we would get along well. In fact, I may even get along well with Alice Marshall. But in this instance, I have decided for ME that her behavior and her recent behavior seems a little bitchy. Again, feel free to rate the comment as unproductive if you need to, but I am not a troll; your rating is used in the wrong context.
I can call George Allen an "asshole" and in America I have that right. But it's "unproductive" and doesn't add to the general discourse.
So, by all means, go ahead call her a "bitch" but I will still rate it "unproductive".
::crawls under rock::
Sorry, folks; I ranted and had the facts wrong, which definitely makes me seem like a Republican troll. :) And in retrospect, I do agree with you, Kevin. Calling names does no good, in fact, it can harm and ruin a point instead. Sometimes it is difficult to be the bigger person, and for me, this was definitely one of those times.
So I give you a 4, an excellent rating, bc being part of the Democratic party, I will always admit when I am wrong, and in this case (though I am still not very fond of Alice Marshall and what she wrote) I was wrong. Thanks! :)
When you watch your industry go through an apocalypse, and you see the policies championed by one man as responsible, what else but Antichrist is there to call him?
Harris Miller tries to deny any responsibility for his past actions, like giving thousands of dollars to right-wing Republicans and strongly urging their re-election. In stark contrast, Jim Webb accepts responsibility for his past mistakes, and makes amends (see Chuck Robb).
Harris Miller constantly makes excuses and brags about how great he is, how much of a "visionary" and a "genius" he is, how he is responsible for all of Mark Warner's political successes, etc. In stark contrast, Jim Webb does not NEED to make excuses or to brag, because he is a true American hero.
So let me state this clearly and unequivocally: Harris Miller is a coward who has no honor. That's right: a COWARD who has NO HONOR. To paraphrase Paul Hackett: I said it and I'm standing by it.
Now, when you consider who to vote for on June 13, just remember this: Harris Miller is all about lies, evasions, lame excuses, business-as-usual corruption and sleaziness, and cowardice. Jim Webb is all about telling the truth, taking responsibility for his actions, fighting for a new way of doing business in Washington, and demonstrating courage not bragging about it! Those are the two different patterns of leadership you'll get from Miller, on the one hand, and Webb on the other, if either becomes our next US Senator. This choice is as clear as they come: Jim Webb is the better man in every possible way, shape and form. Harris Miller should go back to being a smarmy lobbyist where he belongs.
An apology needs to be made.
Do those who support the Cowards become cowards themselves? Seems to be the case to me.
By the way, half of Team Ditzy Democrats is Jewish, and the other half had family members in Stalin's version of concentration camps in Siberia, along with many Russian Jews, and we find this kind of attack on someone like Jim Webb to be incredibly offensive.
Alice, you need to do more than take the post down. You need to admit publically that you've screwed up.
I think this probably reflects Webb's inexperience in politics. But that's an explanation -- not an excuse. If nothing else, today's debate shows Webb definitely needs some seasoning.
He also claimed that he had been forced by his employer to make campaign contributions; a federal elections crime.
To claim it didn't happen is just stupid and yes a lie....I don't think he forgot about those thousands of dollars he donated.
He should come clean and not deny it. It will and has begun to bite him back.
Trying to claim that he can be a "good Democrat" while supporting people who work against democratic principles -- people who are anti-American worker is crap.
Miller has long been the "point man" for the offshore outsourcing lobby in both political arm twisting and financial contributions. His influence over the pols extends far beyond what he has personally donated. He helped put the pols in the pockets of the outsourcing/worker replacement lobby.
No one held a gun to Miller's head and forced him to advocate for postions completely at odds with real democratic values. He did this to make himself wealthy. Trying to claim that he acted "ethically" is complete nonsense. He appears not to have acted outside the law but we all know that there's a difference between ethical conduct and the letter of the law.
Now that Webb crushed Miller in the first debate they have become desperate.
Obviously Miller can't release this attack on his own, but his friends back at the Fairfax County Dems can always sneak it out for him, stooping to a new low in Virginia politics.
Your first instinct was so dead on that the original post is already down in reaction to your fierce defense of Jim Webb. For now, this desperate counter-attack has been fended off, more are sure to come.
It's good that Virginia has finally found a politician in Jim Webb who will stick to the high road and not wallow in the mud.
The only thing that surprises me is that Alice Marshall actually thinks Harris Miller is, as a practical matter, anything more than a would-be placholder.
Marshall doesn't like how the facts represent Miller, so she gets ugly. This has gotten disgusting. They (Miller folks) are making it up as they go.
Let's face it, if Alice had something solid on Webb from the debate she would have used it. They've clearly lost the battle in the blogosphere and now, after a "debate" which yeilded no points for their guy (perhaps even negative points) they're very close to losing the battle outside of the great bit bucket (aka the internet).
So in desperation they're forced to search for meaning in every word and phrase, hoping beyond hope that something will come out to help Miller. Sounds like Alice found a word and twisted it into something that simply doesn't exist in the real world.
Game Over is just around the corner.
Who the hell knew that if he is?
I sure didn't and I know about Miller very well.
So, I expect at least one more call before June 13th.
Funny thing is, he never asks anything about coming to speak, asking me to be involved, or any of the normal stuff. No "Can I send you some information to pass out?". I had to beg to get some fliers and stickers so I could be non-partisan at community events.
If someone on my committee did this with even the slightest hint of the committee's complicity or agreement with them, they would be asked to not post anymore at the least. If that person was an officer, there might be other repercussions.
Anyone see the latest mailer?
Here it is:
"With all due respect, (your post) reminds me of a GOTV 'blackhands' post...or perhaps like Bush's push poll citing John McCain's 'black child.'
A headline like that based on such spin is a giant stretch... based on nothing.
I respect your championing Miller, but please don't get so ugly."
Throughout history, papal opponents and many in protestant denominations have regularly called the Pope, the “anti-christâ€. The use of this term is a regular fixture of Christian/Western religious and cultural discussion...
There’s nothing at all in the NT Book of Revelation/Book of the Apocalypse which says the “anti-christ†is Jewish. This was just a useful opportunity to slime Jim Webb. Someone should call Chuck S. about this directly if it is being put out by Miller, his campaign or his supporters.
Interstingly, NEOCONS used this tactic very successfully to tar more traditional conservatives, driving them from positions of influence. It’s interesting that Miller’s people are doing the same now...
I’ll comment on the “anti-christ†term as it has been used in reference to Miller. I'm in position to do so as an anti-outsourcing activist and a software engineer -- one of the people who has occassionally used the term "anti-christ" in the same breath as "Harris Miller". (I've also called Miller far worse things and I will do so again without regret or shame.)
American information technology workers and anti-outsourcing activists occassionally use this term, "anti-christ" in reference to Miller. It has nothing to do with the fact that Miller is Jewish — a fact which is completely irrelevant to the IT workers complaint.
It has to do with the view that Miller’s actions are evil and he is viewed as evil. "anti-christ" has long been used in reference to Miller before people ever learned that he was Jewish; it has to do with his being a long time pro-outsourcing and worker replacement lobbyist.
Now, Miller’s desperate supporters appear to have latched onto this comments as evidence of “anti-semitismâ€. How pathetic. I view this is yet another slimey attempt at character assassination.
If people don’t like the term, “anti-christâ€, that’s fine but at least let’s understand where it’s coming from and not ascribe it to anti-semitism nor tolerate people who cry “wolf†and cheapen the meaning of racism. The recent revelations about Allen give us an example of real “racismâ€; phony accusations debase the meaning of the word.
So far as I can determine, the author of the Information Week piece noted previously wasn’t attacked as a racist/anti-semite for noting that some consider Miller the "anti-christ".
That's to be expected. As I said, "anti-christ" has nothing at all to do with being Jewish. It has to do with being viewed as evil.
So, those who repeat that this comment is a sign of "anti-semitism" are either slanderous opportunists, ignorant or a venemous mix of the two.
Well, good luck to YOU as well, with Mr. "I vote along the lines with Bush 96% of the time" Allen. I don't feel the need to address him as "Senator" since he has already moved on to try to become President (which will never ever ever ever ever ever ever do I need to go on happen).