There are 70 vulnerable Republican House seats in the 2006 Midterm Elections

By: Dan
Published On: 5/6/2006 6:28:20 PM


This article deals with races all over the country.  Virginia has one race that is considered vulnerable as of now (Thelma Drake in VA-02), however even that could change as races in the 5th, 10th, and 11th heat up.  However, the article below will talk about the overall trends.  Maybe you have friends or family that reside in some of these districts.  Maybe you can encourage them to volunteer. 

Some people believe that in November 2006, the voters will return the Democrats to power in the House of Representatives.  Some people believe that the districts are so gerrymandered that the Republicans will retain the House no matter what happens.  The reality is that the outcome is up to every committed volunteer who wants the Democrats back in power, and the time we are willing to commit to these incredibly important campaigns.

When you look at the House race this fall, several trends emerge: 
1) Several Republicans control districts that went for Kerry in 2004;
2) Even districts with more registered Republicans represent far less than a majority of eligible voters in the district;
3) Vulnerable Republicans are MORE vulnerable than in 2004, not less;
4) Vulnerable Democrats are LESS vulnerable than in 2004, not more;
5) Republicans are facing more vulnerable open seats than Democrats.

I work near Capitol Hill, and recently I ran across a Congress guidebook that lists every Congressman and how much of their District vote they took home in 2004.  I then considered several issues:
1) Whether it now an open seat;
2) Whether they got a low majority in 2004 (less than 60%);
3) How Bush performed in their district in 2004;
4) Whether they had ethics issues;
5) How long the incumbent had been in office;
6) Whether the race been deemed a target or vulnerable seat.
7) Based on review and feedback from volunteers in other states.
In total, I have identified 70 vulnerable seats for Republicans in 27 states.  Each race has a Democratic candidate either vying for an open seat or challenging the incumbent. 

How could 70 Republicans be vulnerable this year?  Well, in 2006, the issues are very different than in 2004.  Besides local issues, no longer can Republicans win these races on issues like gay marriage, guns, National Security, the war in Iraq, and tax cuts.  Families are living paycheck to paycheck.  Gas prices are going up.  Energy prices are going up.  Health care costs are going up.  The situation in Iraq continues to deteriorate.  Iraq war veterans return to see their benefits vanish and jobs disappear.  More Republicans have been implicated in corruption.  Bush+óGé¼Gäós approval ratings are nearly 15 points lower than they were in 2004.  If a Republican was vulnerable in 2004, imagine what they face in 2006. 

The Democrats still face some trouble.  About 15 seats are in jeopardy.  However, this is less than +é-+ the vulnerable seats as the Republicans, and overall the Democrats will face less blame for their problems than their Republican opponents.

Based on my research, I found the Democrats could pick up 12 seats based on current voting trends (disregarding a major voter backlash).  I found the Democrats could pick up 30 seats if voters show some backlash against the Republicans (based on the polls that show a majority of Americans wanting to return the Congress to the Democrats, and the possibility of decent voter turnout).  For all 70 seats to go, the backlash would have to be tremendous, voter turnout would have to be large for Democrats while Republicans would have to stay home. The Democrats would need a strong platform that rivals 1994+óGé¼Gäós +óGé¼+ôContract with America+óGé¼-¥. 

It is less likely that Presidential-only voters who voted for Bush in 2004 will be motivated to come out and vote in 2006.  It is more likely that Presidential-only voters who voted for Kerry in 2004 will be motivated to come out and vote in 2006.  Voters tend to vote when they think their vote can help change something they don+óGé¼Gäót like, or keep something they do like.  Given that polls show two-thirds of the country thinks America is going in the wrong direction, they are more likely to vote for a change.

Although recent elections have been conservative leaning, the Republicans have less to run on in 2006, especially in open seat races.  In 2006, people are likely to be more open to the Democratic message than they were in 2004.  Things have certainly gotten worse in the past two years, and the more they see an alternative out there, the more likely they are willing to consider it. We can change the course this year, but we have to send our resources all over the country.  We have to dispense campaign literature.  We have to knock on doors.  We have to help set up events and get as many voters to show up to hear the Democratic candidate speak.  We have to encourage press coverage. 

Democrats need a positive message this year for what can be done to improve America.  As volunteers we can share a positive message, regardless of whether our leadership does or not. We should listen to the voters when we talk to them.  We should ask them what problems are going on in their lives.  We can tell them how the Democrats plan to change that.  Democrats have a good voting record supporting alternative energy, expanded health care, education, veteran+óGé¼Gäós benefits, the environment, and the middle class. 

Below is a list of key races in 2006.  Perhaps you have friends living in this district.  Maybe they can volunteer or help out these campaigns.  The key is to get the word out about each race and do whatever you can to get out the vote where you live or in a nearby district. 

VULNERABLE REPUBLICAN SEATS

Highly vulnerable races (12)
Colorado (07x)
Connecticut (02)
Illinois (06x)
Indiana (09)
Iowa (01)
Nebraska (01)
New Mexico (01)
New York (24x)
Pennsylvania (06, 07, 08)
Washington (08)

Vulnerable races (18)
Arizona (05, 08x)
California (50x)
Colorado (04)
Connecticut (04)
Indiana (08)
Kentucky (04)
Minnesota (02, 06x)
Nevada (02x, 03)
New Hampshire (02)
New York (20)
North Carolina (11)
Ohio (18)
Pennsylvania (18)
Texas (22x)
Wisconsin (01)

Potential seats (40)
Alaska (01)
Arizona (01,02)
California (11,26)
Colorado (05x)
Connecticut (05)
Delaware (01)
Florida (08, 09x, 13x, 22)
Illinois (10,11)
Indiana (02)
Kentucky (03)
Maryland (01, 06)
Michigan (11)
Montana (01)
New Jersey (02, 03, 04, 07)
New York (03, 13, 26, 29)
North Carolina (05)
Ohio (01, 04x, 12, 15)
Pennsylvania (03, 04, 10)
Texas (19, 32)
Virginia (02)
Wisconsin (08x)

*+óGé¼+ôx+óGé¼-¥ means +óGé¼+ôopen seat+óGé¼-¥
**This article can change over time.  Some races will become closer and some will become more distant.  I encourage feedback on this article, so that we can target every one of these races effectively.

Key campaign resources
Washington Post key  races (Governor, Senate, House)
Democratic Candidates for House of Representatives
2004 results analysis
Candidates with ethics issues
Key House Races


Comments



Interesting analysis (DemTilDeath - 5/6/2006 7:31:27 PM)
Hope you'll do something similar for the Senate races.


I could... (Dan - 5/6/2006 7:39:06 PM)
...for Raising Kaine.  It has been done in many places.  I have reviewed the Senate race before.  About 6 seats that could go, but it will be hard.  We need 6. 


virginia (benawu - 5/6/2006 7:38:39 PM)
Great diary.

What's happening with candidates in VA 4 and 6?



None (Dan - 5/6/2006 7:40:09 PM)
There are currently no Democratic candidates in VA-04 or VA-06.  However, there are candidates in VA-01, 02, 05, 07, 10, and 11.


7th CD (Nichole - 5/6/2006 8:11:31 PM)
Actually as far as I know there is not a candidate right now in the 7th.
The caucus is on Monday, but I don't feel like anyone will be selected.

This saddens me.



What happened Nichole? (Susan Mariner - 5/6/2006 8:15:25 PM)


Long story - short (Nichole - 5/6/2006 8:19:00 PM)
The committees in the 7th wanted the candidates to get 1000 signatures and the filing fee.
It's hard to get anyone to sign in the 7th. The majority of the 7th is very Republican.
Regardless, we simply did not have enough time to do this.

Neither Brad Blanton or Martin were able to do this.

However, the caucus may change this, they can select to go with no candidate or put their own in.

I can't believe they would pick no candidate, it's absurd. Cantor needs to be taken out. Martin is the man to do this.
This should be the year.

But they keep saying they will probably go with no candidate.
It is very frustrating!



No candidate? (Susan Mariner - 5/6/2006 8:23:11 PM)
Who do we contact about this?  That's utterly ridiculous.  Under what theory do those people operate.  You've two potential candidates and they think they'll pick none?  I am astounded.  No wonder there aren't more Democrats in the 7th.  With leadership like decisions like that.


VERY frustrating! (Nichole - 5/6/2006 8:26:53 PM)
We have been trying to talk to these members. I just do not understand their logic for this.
They have not put up a candidate since Cooter ran in 2002.

Blanton is an odd guy. I could go on about that, but it's too long of a story. Here is his site.
http://www.blantonforcongress.com/cs/
Here is a site about his work
http://www.radicalhonesty.com/pages/brad_bio.html



Is it laziness or what? (Susan Mariner - 5/6/2006 8:39:19 PM)
Do they not think it's worth even to try?  How do they know that the Republicans won't utterly self destruct over the next 6 months and then they won't be able to convert that to a win because they don't even have a candidate?  Unbelievable.


Argh (KCinDC - 5/7/2006 4:56:47 PM)
Yes, Cantor is a likely candidate for self-destructing by getting caught up in one of the Republican scandals. It would be ridiculous to miss out of the possibility of taking advantage of that.

What is the local party's problem? Is the idea that Blanton or Dudziak would somehow embarrass the Democratic Party, that they're both wackos or something?

My parents live in the 7th and are eager to vote against Cantor. I'm hoping they'll have that opportunity.



7th? (Dan - 5/7/2006 11:19:58 AM)
There are two candidates.  Martin Dudziak and Brad Blanton.  Are you saying the Democrats in the 7th will choose neither???


Unsure. (Nichole - 5/7/2006 12:16:02 PM)
I don't know at this point... I do not believe that Martin or Brad will be nominated. The Henrico Dems meet Monday, so I will know more then.


This would be a great diary to crosspost at Daily Kos (Susan Mariner - 5/6/2006 7:57:17 PM)
Cross post or crosspost?  Anyone know?


VA 7 (benawu - 5/6/2006 10:08:25 PM)
I would crosspost this myself but have already done one in the last 24 hours.

Any VA locals need to start the email lobbying of the 7th district committee. The necessary contact details are
here



Thank you! (Nichole - 5/6/2006 10:17:17 PM)
Thank you. do you live in the 7th?


Not in the 7th (benawu - 5/6/2006 10:20:32 PM)
Actually I live in Australia! :)


Wow. (Susan Mariner - 5/6/2006 10:36:39 PM)
That's pretty awesome.  Are you an American living there or what? 


wow (benawu - 5/7/2006 4:01:32 AM)
No I am an aussie!


That's amazing! (Susan Mariner - 5/7/2006 7:44:32 AM)
You care more about our elections than most Americans.  From the bottom of my heart I thank you for helping us make right what has gone so terribly wrong in our country. 


Neat! (Nichole - 5/7/2006 11:12:48 AM)
Wow... that is amazing :)


Great Diary! (Luna - 5/7/2006 6:52:13 AM)
I went to a Town Hall meeting with my rep Jim Moran yesterday, and he thinks we take back the House this year - although, he wasn't sure of it until the last week of terrible poll numbers for the GOP.


Maybe if we put a gag on Nancy Pelosi (Dan - 5/7/2006 11:21:37 AM)
Pelosi was on Meet the Press.  She is such a dumb-ass!  She just embarasses herself every time she is on TV!  Of course, Tim Russert was hammering her.


Saw her at a conference once... (Tom Joad (Kevin) - 5/7/2006 6:18:58 PM)
I was highly unimpressed. She actually was scary to look at and right now is too polarizing of a figure to be taken seriously.