BREAKING: Ohio hates women's reproductive rights

By: phriendlyjaime
Published On: 4/18/2006 3:39:44 PM

Well, as I thought it might, South Dakota's abortion ban has resonated with some folks in other states, and it looks like Ohio is the next state to try to take a moral stand against evil baby killers.  Now, if you leave Ohio bc the law for obtaining an abortion in another state is different and Ohio catches you being naughty, you will be penalized.  In addition, anyone helping someone obtain an illegal abortion in Ohio or elsewhere will be charged as an accomplice.
The passage of South Dakota's statewide abortion ban earlier this month has caused a renewed interest in a proposal to make abortions illegal in Ohio.

Ohio house bill 228 introduced by Tim Brinkman, R-Mount Lookout, in April would make it a felony for a woman to seek to terminate her pregnancy and holds the same penalty if she chooses to leave the state for the medical procedure.

Additionally, anyone who helps coordinate an abortion or transportation to leave the state for one could be charged as well.

The controversial nature of the proposed bill has slowed its progress through the legislature.

"House Bill 228, as far as I know, is still in committee. Some bills take more time to come out of committee. You just never know," said Ohio Rep. John Schlichter, R-Greenfield. "I'm a pro-life person. My voting record has been consistent. I was raised in a Christian home."

There are no plans at this time for the bill to be voted into law. However, many groups on both sides of the reproductive rights issues are giving feedback on it.

"House bill 228 was introduced last year and hasn't really been in committee," said Gary Dougherty, executive director of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Ohio. "We're still concerned about it. Just because a bill doesn't get any hearings, doesn't mean the issue has gone away."

Dougherty said he's addressed the issue of abortion accessibility to members of the state legislature. He urged lawmakers to consider how limiting any woman's access to birth control or abortions is detrimental.

"This bill really opens a Pandora's Box of wide and wild interpretations of the need for abortions," he said. "Planned Parenthood is all about preventing unwanted pregnancies. Abortion accounts for just about 5 percent of what we do."

Planned Parenthood focuses on preventative health measures such as pap smears, mammograms, birth control options and sexual education, including abstinence.

Very few centers actually perform abortions and all patients are informed of what the procedure is in advance. Chillicothe's Planned Parenthood branch, located on East Second Street, solely caters to family planning and basic health issues.

"If we are precluded from offering a service, it's the low-income people who are most affected," said Dougherty. "What we should be doing is trying to prevent unintended pregnancies, so the state is not burdened with the cost of raising the child."

Many of the women who seek abortions already have several children and are unable to support another. Others are young women lacking financial stability, including health insurance.

Although unplanned pregnancies can create financial, psychological and physical hardships for women, some organizations see support as the best way for women to cope.

A new organization called Elizabeth's Hope, on North High Street, wants to show pregnant women abortion should be avoided. The nonprofit group is part of a statewide abortion alternative counseling program called Care Net Pregnancy Center.

"We're here to offer support and discuss options," said Peggy Watters, center director in Chillicothe. "When you're in the middle of a crisis, it's not a good time to make life-altering decisions."

Watters and the volunteers at the center offer post-abortion counseling as well as promoting abstinence.

"When women have an abortion, they deal with one crisis, but may have another one later," she said. "We believe waiting for marriage is the best choice."

Elizabeth's Hope operates totally from donations given by area churches and individuals. There also are volunteers -mothers themselves -who counsel girls and women about pregnancy and being good mothers.

Schlichter said the varying ideas on abortion access will be taken into account when he votes.

"You have to rely on your personal views and your constituent's views," he said. "None of these are one-sided issues."

http://www.centralohio.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/B8/20060320/NEWS01/603200302/1002&template=B8

Folks, considering our location, and the fact that some extreme righties live here already and Delay is on his way over, this is beyond scary.  We may have more battles to fight here pretty soon; the Senate race may only be one of the many to come.  What I do with my "parts down south" may be safe with Webb, but Allen?  I'll be in a chastity belt faster than Bush buys his daughters a keg.


Comments



Been Tried Before (AnonymousIsAWoman - 4/18/2006 11:08:38 PM)
I think it's worth being scared. Scared enough to fight. But I am not sure that Ohio is equivalent to South Dakota. There are lots of rural areas in Ohio and it's definitely a swing state. But, unlike South Dakota, Ohio has some large urban, industrial areas - Cleveland, Youngstown, etc. And the Republicans are in big trouble in Ohio - even the rural part. Between one of their congressmen, Robert Ney, being the only named target (among elected officials) so far in the Jack Abramoff corruption probe, their governor, Bob Taft's corruption problems and the whole scandal about the state pension funds that were invested in a rare coin scheme, the Republican Party there is desparate.

All the talk about religion aside, this is a last grasp at a wedge issue. But it might fail. Ohio is a moderate state, whether Republican or Democratic.

And it's hard to see how trying to punish a woman for crossing a state line, for any non-criminal purpose, would pass Constitutional muster. Even if Ohio bans abortion, if it's legal in any other state, a woman has the right to go there. After all, people leave states that outlaw gambling to go to Vegas all the time. If they come back flush with winnings, are they going to be arrested for crossing state lines to gamble?

Last time I looked, people didn't need a passport to cross Ohio into Pennsylvania. And there aren't border guards between the states - although during Browns - Steelers games, there should be.

It would be a violation of privacy and extremely difficult to make a criminal case if somebody went to a different state for an activity that was legal in the neighboring state.

Crossing state lines to commit a crime only works for a prosecutor if it's an illegal act in both the states, like racketeering or prostitution.



Agreed. (phriendlyjaime - 4/18/2006 11:21:16 PM)
While I worry about this because I feel it is a huge step in the wrong direction, I can always rest assured that it will MOST LIKELY be held up in the court system for years, and eventually struck down.

Dems have some momentum now, which is much better than JOE mentum ;) (I just find that whole slang ridiculous and funny) and we have to keep it up.  Because the slope can be very slippery.



Why can't I rate you? (phriendlyjaime - 4/18/2006 11:24:35 PM)
I had a 4 ready to go!  :)

Is that function not set up, or am I crazy and missing something?



oops. (phriendlyjaime - 4/18/2006 11:26:14 PM)
Got it.  Unfortunately, I WAS crazy and missing something.