Eroding Democratic Enthusiasm is the GOP's Hope

By: dsvabeachdems
Published On: 11/8/2008 8:36:57 PM

Enthusiasm for ObamaGive her credit for nothing else, Representative Drake has carried the water for the Republican establishment. Ear to the ground, when she speaks, you can bet she's at least transmitting the vibrations of the herd. Today, some themes were apparent as she addressed a crowd of disappointed Virginia Beach Republicans.

The predictable, meanspirited appeal to the potential voting base, disguised as populism, will include the talking points she outlined today and more. Warning, with little time for the Obama administration to get in place and implementing change, for Virginia elections, these simplistic themes may resonate. With little time for the economy to turn, for 2009, the glue that will bind the Democratic effort will be organization, not enthusiasm.

Republican themes going forward into 2009:
- The strategic energy policy is incoherent
- The economic stimulus plan is a give-away
- The elections were bought
- The elections were stolen
- The media is biased

"We have a great, great mission and that is two thousand and nine," soon to be former Representative Drake began with her sympathetic audience, " ...and how we reach out to more people, because we're right on the issues... I don't know how difficult it will be for the public to see it because you are already seeing how slanted the media is against us...so we have to do it one by one..." And what followed were a set of talking points that look designed to discredit legitimacy as much as obscure responsibility:
The Democrats are without a coherent energy policy. The economy is suffering from the failure of the Democrats to get on board with Republican leadership to "drill here, drill now." Somehow, offshore drilling could have prevented the meltdown of the financial markets. And she predicted a Presidential moratorium on drilling on the outer continental shelf.

"I really believe that what threw us into the spiral we are in was the cost of energy; companies leaving our nation..."

The economic plan put forth by the Democrats will be wrong minded. You are already familiar with this. Democrats want to grow government and make people dependent; Republicans want to grow the economy through tax cuts.

"Watch this economic stimulus package in November: on the Democrats' side it's going to be more unemployment, more heating assistance, more food stamps... on our side it is going to be tax policy that allows us to create jobs and create growth."

The election was bought. Of course, for a long time Democrat, this coming from a Republican is an astounding turn of events: a Republican crying poor-mouth. Representative Drake, without providing figures for her own efforts, rhetorically asked "How do you overcome the incredible amount of money that was spent against me ...our guestimate is from April of '06 till now upwards of $5 million has been spent against me." She railed against the Service Employees International Union.

"The frightening message that has just gone out is that they can buy elections."

The election was stolen. Even more nefarious, she charged that maybe identities were too. Not a well developed theme as yet, but apparently she has been in contact with Attorney General McDonnell about her concerns for the privacy of those whose information was taken by persons unknown. "Why do we allow people to stand out in front of DMV?" she asked, implying that voter registration drives were culprits in any of a number of schemes.

"I have calls from people who were never registered."

The media is slanted against us. Now this is harder to reconcile the more you consider it. If the mainstream media is slanted toward the Democrats, why would the Democrats want it balanced?

"I think fairness doctrine is one that they will bring back."

And for all watching the 5th:

"Aren't you guys stunned that Virgil Goode is in a recount and 600 votes down? "

So there you have the world according to Representative Drake. She has at least given fair warning of the themes that will be forthcoming. It is easy to imagine the Virginia GOP beating these drums effectively. There is nothing here that will rally the Democratic base and a lot to appeal to the GOP's. But really, give her credit for nothing else.

Cross posted at VBDems - Blogging our way to Democratic wins in Virginia Beach! Go RK!


Comments



"Democrats bought the election" (Teddy - 11/8/2008 8:58:43 PM)
was what a Republican said to me in Fairfax on election day itself, and I must confess I laughed like hell and told the guy, "Great! Now you know how the Democrats have felt for over 20 years." He was quite indignant. Hahahahaha.

So, yes, you are correct in believing that complaint will be one of the Republican talking points, as will an abiding concern about the destruction of democracy because of fraudulent voter registration and deliberately mistaken identities of voters (Acorn!)... all of the fraudulent voters being "those ones" who are not whitebread countryclub and who have unpronounceable names. Boohoohoo.

Also, yes, it will be up to the Obama grassroots to demand that the Democrats, especially the national old-line Democrats shut up and get with the Obama program. No wavering. No whining. No special exception diversions. Grrr.  



Registration complaints (KCinDC - 11/8/2008 9:26:21 PM)
There's a simple solution to registration complaints: universal registration. Every citizen is automatically registered, and the government makes sure they are. If we can do it for Selective Service, why not for voting? We wouldn't need to rely on groups like ACORN to register voters.

Somehow I think the Republicans won't go for that, because their real concern isn't about fraud, it's about too many people they don't want registered being registered.



I'm glad they think the election was bought (notjohnsmosby - 11/8/2008 10:12:24 PM)
If you go to the conservative blogs, a lot of posters are convinced it was all money, and a vast army of paid, out of state poll workers and attorneys and ACORN and everything else is the reason they lost.  Well, just reading the blurbs here, it's apparent why the Republicans lost - they're largely idiots.  

Drake never came across to me as being very bright.  I thought she was a crappy State Senator, and she won her Congressional seat when another "I'm not gay just because I have sex with men because the men I have sex with aren't gay since they just have sex with guys like me, who also aren't gay" Republican had to resign "while innocent" after getting taped doing the old Republican Shuffle as outlined above.  She should have lost in 2006, she did lose and it wasn't very close this time.

It's a regular Republican enema out there and crap candidates like Drake are on their way to the septic system where they below.



The people "bought" this election (Will Write For Food - 11/9/2008 1:30:16 AM)
rather than the gun lobby, Big Oil, far-right megachurches and other lobbyists more concerned about power and influence than the common welfare of the people. If the right thinks the election was "bought," it was bought with small donations by millions of ordinary people across the country and dedicated staffers who endured long hours, poor pay if any, knocking on doors, registering new voters, scheduling events, etc. Maybe that's why the RNC was dedicated to bashing community organizers: they saw the grassroots threat they posed to them!

Obama's thumping in both the popular and Electoral votes wasn't an accident. GOP lost Virginia, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Indiana, Iowa and North Carolina for a reason, and exit polls indicate the only GOP voters this time around were 19th-century America: the small-town white protestants. If GOP continues to be the Anti-Progress Party, they'll turn into the modern-day No-Nothing Party.



"They" bought the election but we (Bill Carlin - 11/9/2008 3:29:41 AM)
are leaving campaign finance reform or publicly financed elections to keep big money out of politics off of the table?  I would love to see this issue blow up in their faces!  National standards for Elections?  Again, untouchable.

As for the fairness doctrine, I'd say that would be missing the target.  A "truth" doctrine with penalties (imagine O'Reilly or Hannity being obligated to tell the 'folks' they were full of crap, again & again, until this correction ritual consumes the entire time slot.



faux news (NP - 11/9/2008 4:12:35 AM)
A problem is that fox news is not registered as news, it is entertainment (babbling entertainment).  Same with Limbaugh.  When he is called on his facts he says "I'm an entertainer, I don't have to be accurate."  So many many people are sourcing through entertainment.  We do it with Jon Stewart but he is accurate and attempts at spoof are obvious. And we know we are being entertained.  


Fair and balanced . . . (JPTERP - 11/9/2008 5:10:07 AM)
One of the ironies in Fox's opposition is its own slogan.  

Presumably a channel that has "fair and balanced" coverage should already be in compliance with the old fairness doctrine -- in other words, the re-institution of the rule should have no impact on its programming (truth is hard to measure sometimes -- equal time is not).

I don't see what they're whining about either -- in the new media environment where there is cable news and satellite radio -- a reintroduction of the fairness doctrine wouldn't have much impact on them.  It would only impact those using the public airwaves -- so it would only impact one segment of Fox's programming (it's AM broadcasting).  Limbaugh too would probably do just fine if he was forced to transition from AM to a satellite only broadcast.  



A new niche for "news"papers? (Teddy - 11/9/2008 11:51:15 AM)
Infotainment takes over television and cable; each citizen chooses the silo of info-tainment that agrees with his personal prejudices. Would that not leave available to print media a niche? A niche that actually does provide basic, fact-based honest-to-god news. More like  The Christian Science Monitor for example. Get back to the original announcement-here's-what's-going-on publications that started the whole newspaper business: broadsheets.