Reckless Ambition

By: Josh
Published On: 9/18/2008 4:46:52 PM

The big question about the election these days is "What's up with McCain?"  On every issue under the sun, McCain seems completely out of control, so what's the deal?

There's evidence that what we're seeing is an example of Reckless Ambition at the highest levels, similar what we've seen over the last 8 years:

Why flip-flop on Massive Financial Bailouts? - reckless ambition.

Why suddenly re-brand yourself a regulating reformer after 26 years as an anti-regulation zealot? - reckless ambition.

Why run a despicable, insulting, smear-filled, Pro-lie campaign? - reckless ambition.

Why select an unqualified base-stoking zealot as your running mate?- reckless ambition.
Why serious diplomatic problems with Spain to hide any possible hint of creeping senility? - reckless ambition.

I've been trying to puzzle it out.  There do seem to be some clues.  

First, take a look at this from a recent Politico profile:

In his 2002 memoir, 'Worth the Fighting For,' he wrote, revealingly, 'I didn't decide to run for president to start a national crusade for the political reforms I believed in or to run a campaign as if it were some grand act of patriotism. In truth, I wanted to be president because it had become my ambition to be president. . . . In truth, I'd had the ambition for a long time.'

MMM... sounds like we've got a guy running full head of steam on "ambition".

Now this from a recent WaPo profile:

"I think his mind is visceral," Hart said, "driven less by thought and more by feelings. This doesn't mean he's totally reactive or without logic or thought processes; it just means he's a fighter pilot. He reacts to circumstances."

A senior official in the Clinton administration who worked with McCain on Bosnia and Kosovo, where McCain defied most of his Republican colleagues to support strong U.S. action against Serbia, agreed. "In the many, many years that I've been in Washington," this former official said, insisting on anonymity to avoid upsetting McCain, "John McCain is far and away the most emotional politician I have ever met."

"McCain is all emotion," the former official continued. "People don't understand that, so they keep talking about his temperament, his temper. He reacts emotionally, therefore unpredictably."

Take overwhelming emotion and add driving ambition and what do you get?  We've seen it in Bush in the last 8 years and in the McCain campaign in the last 18 months.  McCain will do anything, say anything, betray his own honor, shirk his responsibilities as a candidate, tell any lie, throw any smear, in order to fulfill his RECKLESS AMBITION to be president.  After 8 years of this reckless ambition stuff, maybe it's time for a change.


Comments



Crazy Hothead or Grumpy Old Man (Josh - 9/18/2008 5:00:01 PM)
just for fun... you decide.


And Palin? (bamboo - 9/18/2008 5:04:55 PM)
NYT's front-pager last Sunday carried a quote from an Alaskan friend who revealed Palin's own unfettered ambition to be president, which is even scarier that McCain's. So in this respect, at least, the two GOP candidates are a perfect match of over-zealous political animals totally committed to winning however they can.  


It looks like Steve Schmidt is making all major campaign decisions... (FMArouet21 - 9/18/2008 5:33:34 PM)
with guidance from his guru Karl Rove.

John McThuselah is now merely acting like the geriatric public front man for the Rove/Schmidt GOP brain trust. It seems unlikely that he actually has any remaining decision-making authority over his own campaign. Can his handlers calibrate his medications and schedule his naps so that he can appear to be alert for the Presidential debates? They managed the trick for Rick Warren's Faith Forum, but McCain could just as easily have low-energy, foggy days at the upcoming debates.

Handling a geezer was not so hard for the staffs of Mao Zedong, Leonid Brezhnev, or Kim Il-sung, for absolutely every public appearance could be meticulously scripted and controlled. Doing so is not so easy in a U.S. Presidential campaign, though Republicans did a fair job with Reagan in 1984, when his cognitive decline had already begun.

Sarah Mooselini is the eye candy to draw the crowds to the revival tent. Can she memorize enough Rove/Schmidt bumper sticker slogans to survive the VP debate?

One almost has to feel sorry for Schmidt and Rove. Even their best efforts may not suffice to program these two animatrons--one rusted and creaking and one a virtual blank slate--to victory.

Maybe this GOP bumper sticker will work for them:

     McThuselah/Mooselini - 1208
     Medieval is as Medieval Does



Well said! (Teddy - 9/18/2008 6:30:06 PM)


I am still bothered that McCain (Tiderion - 9/18/2008 7:32:56 PM)
and plenty of Americans do not understand what voting present means. Even if he does know, there is no honor in playing on the ignorance of the electorate.
"When AIG was bailed out, I didn't like it, but I understood it needed to be done to protect hard-working Americans with insurance policies and annuities," he (McCain) said. "Sen. Obama didn't take a position. On the biggest issue of the day, he didn't know what to think. He may not realize it, but you don't get to vote 'present' as president of the United States."
Come on, dude. Like you know what the President gets to do.


McCain Lied Again Tonight (Mule - 9/18/2008 8:20:34 PM)
I saw a McCain ad this evening on D.C.'s ABC Channel 7 about the growing financial meltdown in which McCain told another, bald-faced lie.  He said that Obama's plan for dealing with the crisis simply was "talk and more taxes."  With these kinds of ads, the guy is shredding whatever he has left of his honor.  How can anyone respect this guy anymore?


But it plays well (Teddy - 9/18/2008 9:13:18 PM)
with the voters who are conditioned by constant reptition to hate taxes and blame Democrats.