A Question for Sarah
By: kathstack
Published On: 9/10/2008 7:44:47 AM
The blogs are abuzz with debate on whether Charles Gibson--annointed First Questioner of the Republicans' vice-presidential pick--will ask "hard questions," and, if so, what those questions will be.
Two answers:
No he won't. Why do you think they picked him?
However, in a perfect world, I believe Sarah Palin should be asked: You continue to claim you opposed the Bridge to Nowhere; your claim is, "I told Washington, Thanks but no thanks." This is not true; there is video to prove it is not true. (Show video of Palin campaigning for the bridge.) Why should anyone believe anything you say; why should anyone waste time questioning you if the answers will be bald-faced lies?
It would be interesting, but it won't happen.
Comments
Great question, but... (Lowell - 9/10/2008 7:51:14 AM)
...Charlie Gibson is atrocious, just think back to the Democratic debate that he and George Stephanopolous "moderated." That was a complete disgrace, Charlie Gibson is a pompous ass, and the corporate media is very close to worthless.