Some of the people who know Sarah Palin best chime in with their opinions on whether or not she's qualified to be VP:
"She's not qualified, she doesn't have the judgment, to be next in line to the president of the United States," Larry Persily, who until June worked in the governor's Washington office as a congressional liaison, said in a phone interview yesterday.A supporter of Palin's campaign for governor, Jim Whitaker, the Republican mayor of Fairbanks, also questioned Palin's readiness to serve as vice president in a phone interview yesterday.
Whitaker said that while he is "still an avid supporter" of Palin as governor, he will continue to back Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama.
These are Republicans, remember, one a former Palin staffer and one a supporter of hers as Governor of Alaska. What does that tell you?
Meanwhile, the Fairbanks News-Miner on Friday wrote:
Most people would acknowledge that, regardless of her charm and good intentions, Palin is not ready for the top job. McCain seems to have put his political interests ahead of the nation's when he created the possibility that she might fill it.It's clear that McCain picked Palin for reasons of image, not substance...
Isn't that exactly what we've been saying?
He cited Palin's stint as governor of a "state that produces 20 percent of America's energy" as well as her previous membership in the PTA and her time spent on the city council and in the mayor's office in Wasilla, a town of 7,000 people outside Anchorage.
Isn't it hilarious that Katrina, I mean Gustav, provided an excuse for Bush and Cheney to duck out of the Convention and so save McCain the embarrassment of being photographed endlessly with them, thus fixing in every television viewer's mind the Democrats' mantra that McC is Bush III? Having locked in the right wing with Palin, McC has now begun the trek away from Bush-Cheney necessary to win independents.
It depends ultimately on whether you are saying that because they have only managed a small town they can't be president or that their talent doesn't extend beyond that job. If it is the former, then it is definitely elitist. I think the point or concern that people have been expressing so far here is that her ability does not extend beyond being an executive in that state.
Either way, Palin is a governor now and that means something. I just don't see us surviving her as president. I still want a president who can talk intelligently.
I think back to Texas. If I elected someone really awesome to fix Texas State Government, I would want them to finish that job before moving on to anything else. If they decided to do something different before finishing the job, I would naturally question their commitment and revisit my own judgment over selecting them for the position. So, ultimately, I don't that her experience as Governor means something positive (to me anyway).
As far as surviving her as president, I don't know that we have enough data points to really judge her on that. She may have talent that extends well beyond being an executive of a small state and a small town. Whether we will ever get a sense of that is up in the air. Based on the limited data we do have, I would agree. But I am open to the possibility that she might demonstrate communication/negotiation skills and an ability to understand/navigate complex issues that I have not seen yet. I'd hate to limit her or anyone just the current job they hold. I mean individuals can have untapped potential that we don't notice and then are surprised when we see it.
The issue for me is that I just do not like the whole view of her in the campaign. Yes, you can be a successful mother while running a campaign. But why would you? As a man, I know I would try to restrict some of my activities to set aside time for my family (and not just cause Obama told me to, haha). While she does have limited executive experience, she has no legislative experience. I don't want to demean the small towns and states but the more population, the more problems, and the bigger challenge.
Now it is true that some people are naturally talented at getting things done. If Obama isn't qualified enough then neither was Lincoln. But all indicators for me of the power of command are not evident in Palin. She does not seem to be a great communicator. By the time we all vote, I hope we'll know just what to do about Palin. If I were her, I would have gone for a Senate seat before the VP seat, like Warner. I do not think Palin represents Americans or speaks for them well and I do not see foreign nationals responding well to her, imagine Mary Antoinette.
DON'T ELECT THIS MAN!
For the dignity and integrity of this nation, please... I beg of you.
If only the PTA could prevent natural disasters, and respond to them smartly when they do happen. If only global conflicts could be settled in a hockey match. But they can't - and Palin has no business being one heartbeat away from being the commander in chief.
McCain is doing just what Bush did - he made important issues of human survival based on politics. How do you think Brownie became the head of FEMA? Enough is enough - our national security is too important.
But Obama being afraid of her was not one of them.
As for whether Obama chose the "most qualified" running mate, that can certainly be amatter for debate. The point is that the running mate he chose, Joe Biden, is among the many qualified Democrats for the job.
The PUMA crowd would not accept anything less than their heroine as #1. It was a no-win situation for Obama, and he made the right choice.
In a VP pick, you need chemistry, balance, and compatibility as well as raw qualifications. An Obama-Clinton administration would not have worked IMHO.