John Kerry Steals the Show ... (But Did You See It?)

By: Ron1
Published On: 8/28/2008 1:11:30 AM

If you were exclusively watching the convention via one of the gas-bag central TV "news" channels, you might have missed John Kerry's speech, as it came after Bill Clinton's -- it was more important to bloviate and "analyze" than to listen to Senator Kerry. So, if you missed it, I sincerely implore you to spend 13 quality minutes doing so.

With all apologies to former President Bill Clinton and his magnanimous and crucial speech, Senator John Kerry absolutely blasted Senator John McCain in a speech that, if it gets the amount of attention it deserves in Democratic circles and in the lefty blogosphere, will be remembered with Senator Hillary Clinton's speech as one of the highlights of the Democratic National Convention.

Many Democrats and progressive online denizens have been worried the past few weeks about the lack of effective and structured messaging coming out of the Obama campaign. Well, problem solved -- and John Kerry set the frame of debate that Democrats need to hammer during the fall campaign in order to reclaim the White House:

I have known and been friends with John McCain for almost 22 years. But every day now I learn something new about candidate McCain. To those who still believe in the myth of a maverick instead of the reality of a politician, I say, let's compare Senator McCain to candidate McCain.

Candidate McCain now supports the wartime tax cuts that Senator McCain once denounced as immoral. Candidate McCain criticizes Senator McCain's own climate change bill. Candidate McCain says he would now vote against the immigration bill that Senator McCain wrote. Are you kidding? Talk about being for it before you're against it.

Let me tell you, before he ever debates Barack Obama, John McCain should finish the debate with himself.


And just in case there wasn't enough righteous indignation in that bold summarization, Kerry threw in a lovely bit of quiet humor to goad us on as well before bringing the speech home:

So remember, when we choose a commander-in-chief this November, we are electing judgment and character, not years in the Senate or years on this earth. Time and again, Barack Obama has seen farther, thought harder, and listened better. And time and again, Barack Obama has been proven right.

When John McCain stood on the deck of an aircraft carrier just three months after 9/11 and proclaimed, "Next up, Baghdad!", Barack Obama saw, even then, "an occupation of "undetermined length, undetermined cost, undetermined consequences" that would "only fan the flames of the Middle East." Well, guess what? Mission accomplished.

So who can we trust to keep America safe? When Barack Obama promised to honor the best traditions of both parties and talk to our enemies, John McCain scoffed. George Bush called it "the soft comfort of appeasement." But today, Bush's diplomats are doing exactly what Obama said: talking with Iran.

So who can we trust to keep America safe? When democracy rolled out of Russia, and the tanks rolled into Georgia, we saw John McCain respond immediately with the outdated thinking of the Cold War. Barack Obama responded like a statesman of the 21st century.

So who can we trust to keep America safe? When we called for a timetable to make Iraqis stand up for Iraq and bring our heroes home, John McCain called it "cut and run." But today, even President Bush has seen the light. He and Prime Minister Maliki agree on guess what? a timetable.

So who can we trust to keep America safe? The McCain-Bush Republicans have been wrong again and again and again. And they know they will lose on the issues. So, the candidate who once promised a "contest of ideas," now has nothing left but personal attacks. How insulting to suggest that those who question the mission, question the troops. How pathetic to suggest that those who question a failed policy doubt America itself. How desperate to tell the son of a single mother who chose community service over money and privilege that he doesn't put America first.

You can read the rest of the speech here, but I recommend instead that you watch the video clip above.

The introduction of Senator Obama's great-uncle from the gallery was a stroke of emotional genius, just as the video about our veterans was.

This entire night gets an A+ from me (even despite Joe Biden's slightly disappointing speech) -- because it expertly set up the frames that ought to be used to rightfully and finally hoist John McCain on to the petard that he built with George W. Bush and Karl Rove.

Thank you, Senator Kerry.  


Comments



Where was this guy in 2004?! (Josh - 8/28/2008 3:51:51 AM)
Seriously, with this clear and biting attack Kerrey could have been president.

good lord

I actually like this guy.



Kerry could actually have a future in politics ;) n/t (Josh - 8/28/2008 4:23:57 AM)


Another low point for the corporate media (Lowell - 8/28/2008 6:35:49 AM)
Last night, I flipped to the broadcast networks - except for PBS - during Bill Clinton's and John Kerry's speeches and saw...the usual TV idiocy, aka NOT the convention.  So...these same networks that blathered on and on about how there was (supposedly) such a "rift" in the Democratic Party didn't feel it necessary to show that "rift" being closed/healed/slammed shut?  That means, if you're a viewer of one of these networks, all you got was the "conflict" angle but not the resolution.  That's irresponsible and biased by the formerly "mainstream," now completely corporate and utterly inane, media?  Not.


CNN (varealist - 8/28/2008 8:03:19 AM)
CNN covered Kerry's speech live.


That's cable (Lowell - 8/28/2008 8:12:11 AM)
I'm talking about the broadcast networks.


Very true (Indy4all - 8/28/2008 10:34:45 AM)
But will someone please tell maddow to either shut up or actually project real rationalism. I am sure she is frustrated by some of the direction of the afternoon commentary on MSNBC but talk about making sure you do not "do any harm". She needs to chill. Her line of thought is muddling the message.


Only Jim Lehrer for me.... (ub40fan - 8/28/2008 8:12:43 AM)
They cover most everything well ... and John Kerry's speech was awesome ... best I've seen him give and proof positive of what an asset he'll be to Obama's campaign.


Agreed. (Lowell - 8/28/2008 8:14:05 AM)
I pretty much never watch TV in general, and certainly not the networks or the cable idiocy (I don't subscribe to cable and never will), but on the rare occasions that I do, it's PBS all the way.


Jim Lehrer is one of my favorites. (Tiderion - 8/28/2008 10:20:24 AM)
But I have been tivoing CNN while watching CSPAN. I understand MSNBC blew up yesterday.


More Convention - Less Bloviation (AnonymousIsAWoman - 8/28/2008 9:42:35 AM)
I've been watching it on C-Span, which is great!  There's no commentary, no anchors, nothing but unfiltered convention where you get to hear all the speeches and see all the speakers and also shots of the audience.  Dan and I even listened to C-Span radio on the way home last night and heard the roll call.  It's the next best thing to being there in terms of hearing and seeing everything unfiltered.


I've been switching between PBS and C-SPAN (Ron1 - 8/28/2008 10:56:37 AM)
C-SPAN doesn't come in in HD, so I've been toggling between the two when PBS decides to give me the "gift" of David Brooks' inane elitist ramblings.

The other low point of the convention for the "news" networks was them ignoring the speech of Lilly Ledbetter. I wish more Americans had seen that speech to understand just exactly what four more years of Republican mis-rule would mean.

Seriously, for two hours a night couldn't they just have the gasbags keep quiet and listen to the speeches?

I guess not.



I actually like Brookes (Pain - 8/28/2008 12:31:58 PM)

Not because I agree with him, but because I think he tells it pretty much like it is, from the GOP perspective.  If he says it's a good speech, then you can bet the GOPO spin doctors are worried and have to work that much harder to try to cloud the issue.

I find him far easier to watch and listen to, than I do to read his columns.



Do me a favor (Ron1 - 8/29/2008 2:21:18 AM)
Read this petulant article and let me know if you can still maintain the illusion. Blecch.

I think this is him in his true form -- whining, childish, and sarcastic without being funny.

What a prick.

[To be fair to you, you did say you preferred his TV appearances :)]



I'll pass (Pain - 8/29/2008 8:37:39 AM)

I'll moonwalk back a few steps and say that what Brooks said after Obamas speech last night wasn't what I expected.  He said that the speech just wasn't his best and wouldn't really do much for independent voters, blah blah blah.  He must have been watching something else, cause the speech I saw rocked the house.

Generally speaking I do find Brooks acceptable to watch on Mcneil-Lehrer along side Mark Shields, but to read his stuff isn't what I'd consider more appealing than a sharp stick in the eye.



I just watched Mcneil-Lehrer (Pain - 8/29/2008 8:04:40 PM)

And I think Brooks came back to what I expected him to say last night, which was a valid critic of it from a GOP point of view.  I think it was a valid response.  David Brooks gave the speech an A- to B+, and I think that is fair.