House Passes Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act

By: Lowell
Published On: 5/21/2008 5:52:31 PM

Excellent news from Jim Moran's office. I am very interested to see the roll call vote on this one...who were the 160 ignoramuses who voted against THIS?!?

House Passes 'Green' Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act

Washington, D.C., May 21st - Congressman Jim Moran, Virginia Democrat today joined a majority of the House of Representatives in support of legislation to help expand the production and use of renewable energy, create "green collar" jobs and provide tax important tax benefits to middle class families. The Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act (H.R. 6049) was approved by the House by a vote of 263-160.

"Exploding energy demands have our country over a $130 barrel of crude," said Moran. "The path to energy independence, however, is paved not with petroleum but with sustainable, renewable sources of power-a path that protects our environment, creates good jobs and boosts our economy.  Americans have always had the ingenuity, drive and vision to make this a reality; finally we have a Congress to match that's willing to put its muscle behind a plan for a green future."


To reduce our dependence on foreign oil and to protect the environment, the Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act would increase the production of renewable fuels and renewable electricity, and encourage greater energy efficiency.  It extends and expands tax incentives for renewable electricity, energy and fuel from America's heartland, as well as for plug-in hybrid cars, and energy efficient homes, buildings, and appliances.

Failing to extend some of these provisions could have significant consequences for American workers. A recent study showed that allowing the renewable energy incentives to expire would lead to about 116,000 jobs being lost in the wind and solar industries through the end of 2009.

The legislation also supports businesses and provides important tax benefits to millions of American families. The bill extends the research and development tax credit to spur American innovation and business investment and cuts taxes for millions of Americans, including teachers, college students and families in states with no income tax. It expands eligibility for the $1,000 refundable child tax credit and provides tax breaks to homeowners who do not itemize their deductions by permitting them to deduct up to $700 of property taxes in addition to their standard deduction.

"This legislation makes clear Congress is not content to bury its head in the sand and pretend an energy strategy of the past will meet our needs for the future," added Moran. "In these troubled times, a new way of thinking and bold action is required to meet the energy challenges we face.  We started by increasing auto fuel standards to 35 mpg, our next step is to boost consumer and industry incentives to go green."


Comments



Little birds have told me ... (TheGreenMiles - 5/21/2008 5:56:51 PM)
... that Roadblock Republicans on Capitol Hill are coming up with reasons to oppose this because they don't want the Democrats to have it as an accomplishment to campaign on in the fall.


oh, you know the ignoramuses (Ron1 - 5/21/2008 7:05:00 PM)
Howzabout Messrs. Davis, Tom; Wolf; Wittman; Forbes; Goode; Goodlatte; and Cantor; and of course Ms. Drake.

Perfect 8-for-8!



I have given this more thought (Ron1 - 5/21/2008 7:16:09 PM)
I am going to dub them, and the approx. 150 other Republicans that voted against this, the 'Marching off the Cliff Caucus'. It has a ring to it that pleases me.

[Just to be non-partisan or bi-partisan on this, as that appears to be the catchphrase of the day here on Raising Kai... err, RK, Nick Lampson, D-TX, also voted against this. So there are Democratic ignoramuses as well!]



These people truly (Lowell - 5/21/2008 7:47:28 PM)
are godawful.  Why would they vote against THIS?!?


A few points I would like to have seen (Alter of Freedom - 5/21/2008 7:25:00 PM)
I would have hoped we could get a provision or tax rebate/deduction for homeowners who retrofit older homes that use oil. Imagine if homeowners could convert those older homes that use oil to new natural gas solutions. Eliminate some of the needs for oil and also get those oil delivery trucks off the roads as well at the same time.
Also, though I support the renewable paridigm, we must do better than or ethanoyl experiment. I would have liked a conversion to natural gas formats which would decrease our dependence on foriegn oil as well.
Also, interesting point and waiting on some pics from friends in the military but they are using synthetic creations in the military right now to power heavy trucks over the standard gasoline. If our military can find ways to make synthetics and quasi-liquid coal solutions work why cannot we at least have a serious debate about the potential of this opportunity.


"energy and fuel from America's heartland" (Eric - 5/23/2008 10:46:31 AM)
Does this mean what I think it means (i.e. Corn for Cars)?  If so, that is not a good thing.  

But overall this is an excellent move in the right direction.