"The Maverick vs. The Placeholder"

By: Lowell
Published On: 12/22/2005 2:00:00 AM

I just read a fascinating article at TPM Cafe on James Webb and Harris Miller.  It's called, "VA Senate Race: The Maverick vs. The Placeholder."  One quote that caught my eye was this:

But James Webb also is the kind of candidate who scares the hell out of certain Beltway Insider [tm] types -- because he's a maverick who isn't afraid to speak his mind.

He was one of only a handful of former Republican senior officials who didn't let his (then) affiliation with the Republican party stop him from calling bull---t on President Bush's Iraq misadventure, in a very loud and public way. 

I also thought this was very interesting:

Clearly, this is a guy who calls it like he sees it, and has an independent streak a mile wide.  And my guess is, when insiders at the DSCC, etc, read his writings, they probably thought he might be a controversial candidate -- a bit of a maverick, and someone who isn't going to be amenable to taking orders from the party leadership....

Given that these insiders don't think the Virginia race is winnable, they've taken a page out of the old playbook -- run a 'safe' candidate....

I don't know what's inside their heads, obviously, but that strikes me as the likely reason for the apparent turn toward Harris Miller -- they don't expect to win, and he's a safe candidate who will stick to the script and not make any waves.  I think they're wrong, however.

There's more, particularly on Harris Miller's "strong" support for "outsourcing many more Federal Government jobs" as well as for:

...expansion of the H1-B visa program, which is very controversial among tech-sector workers since, by introducing a supply of much cheaper labor into the U.S. labor market, it tends to weaken American programmers' and engineers' bargaining power via-a-vis their employers.

Honestly, I don't know much about the H1-B program or its potential implications for high-tech workers, so I'm not really sure what to make of all this.  Is it a bunch of bull?  Or is the author onto something here?  What do you  all think?  And what about the core charge, that the Democrats in Virginia have decided to run a "placeholder" against George Allen, not someone with a real chance of winning?  Discuss among yourselves!  Ha ha.


Comments