Jim Gilmore for US Senate- C+ (LINK)
Jim Gilmore for US Senate- C+ (LINK)
Ease of Use- D (There are words everywhere... you just don't know where to start!)
Attractiveness- F (It just doesn't look like a site for someone who is seriously running for the United State Senate Senate... I've seen websites for folks running for Student Government President that looked better!)
Functionality- A (The website allows you to do everything you need to do- Volunteer, Contribute, Email a Friend, and Become a Convention Delegate.)
Fresh Content- A (While the sheer amount of unorganized content is a negative... you can't say that the Gilmore campaign isn't updating their website!)
Bob Marshall for US Senate- A- (LINK)
Ease of Use- B (A little cluttered, but it's certainly easy enough figuring out how to navigate the website.)
Attractiveness- A+ (If I didn't already know better, one would swear that Bob Marshall was a serious candidate... His website is actually one of the best political websites I've seen in a while.)
Functionality- A (You can do everything you should be able to do online!)
Fresh Content- A (Plenty of new and updated content.)
Mark Warner for US Senate- A/A- (LINK)
Ease of Use- A+ (Simple and Clean)
Attractiveness- A (Very Nice and Professional Website)
Functionality- B+ (Warner is the king of high-tech... so hopefully his campaign rolls out some really nifty and high-tech features, not just the standard "Volunteer" and "Contribute"!)
Fresh Content- A (Not nearly as much fresh content as the other two... but he doesn't need as much since the election hasn't heated up quite yet)