Turns out he was Irish all along.
No, really! Well, a little bit. His great-great-great-grandfather was born in Ireland before coming to America in 1850.
Taking a look at the campaign websites, who knew St. Patrick's Day would be a metaphor for the entire race?
Obama's St. Patrick's Day outreach? A killer t-shirt. I'm completely bitter I didn't see it until tonight, too late to get one for St. Patrick's Day.
Clinton's St. Patrick's Day outreach? A 1,312 word treatise on her work on the Northern Ireland peace process. Rich with substance, but ... yawn.
Bless the Obama campaign staff. They've been working their arses off for 13 months now.
If she gets the "positive by association" then she should also get the "negative by association" -- you can't just have it one way.
Better bet: Just stick with pros clearly related to things Hillary actually did - not what Bill or "the clintons" did. It just makes it seem forced and irrelevant and detracts from her many accomplishments.
The one thing that Hillary played a major role in was Health Care, and we all know how that ended up.
Stop giving Hillary credit for things Bill did.
So, if you want to call BS on her, you are probably right. But if we applied that standard to every candidate and every campaign claim, all we would do during campaigns is run around yelling "bullshit" at everything an opponent says. (Uh...., oh, nevermind, I have a point to make.)
But to completely discount Hillary Clinton's experience as First Lady as meaningless, as "just along for the ride," is quite unfair.
The fact is, regardless of what she personally did, she had a unique opportunity to see how this all works from a front row seat. To know how it feels to be in the pressure-cooker. To see and experience, first-hand, the management of crises and the way people conduct themselves in these settings, whether a peace negotiation in Ireland, a meeting with legislative leaders in the White House or responding to a scandal.
You can fairly debate how much weight to give that experience, but to deny that it exists in contrary to common experience.
Observing and experiencing from the inside are valuable forms of experience.
But I stand behind my overall point, which is basically the same one made by notwalt...., above, and that is that having been First Lady for 8 years is unique, relevant experience to being president.
It doesn't mean that it qualifies every First Lady to be president, any more that Obama's experience as a state legislator means that every state legislator's experience qualifies them to be president.
But Sen. Clinton's detractors too easily dismiss this experience as having no relevance whatsoever.
Frankly, seems illogical to me that somehow Obama's years as a community organizer and state Senator in illinois are relevant to being President, but eight years spent in the White House in a variety of capacities, many of which related to strategic decisions, is derided.