This morning's Meet the Press:
RUSSERT: "Governor Rendell, if, in fact, Barack Obama goes to the convention in Colorado in August with the most elected delegates, having won more contests and a higher popular vote, the cumulative vote, could he be denied the nomination?"RENDELL: "Well, sure, Tim."
Sen. Clinton, in an interview with Newsweek:
"Even elected and caucus delegates are not required to stay with whomever they are pledged to."
And using the fact that no one will wind up with 2,000+ pledged delegates as an excuse to take this to the convention? Look, Bill Clinton couldn't win without superdelegates in 1992. This is all about overturning the will of the voters, not "letting it play out" for a little while longer.
You combine this with members of the Clinton campaign continuing to insult Obama supporters by calling them hippies who worship a "messiah"; and you have a recipe for disaster in Denver this summer. (not to mention the next 4 years with McBush in the White House)
At this point I can say with 100% confidence that I will not support Clinton if she wins the nomination in part on the basis of seating delegates from uncontested primaries in Michigan and Florida.
Two words come to mind if asked to switch...
"Hell NO!!"
Now, things are very different. I don't even really consider her a Democrat. She is hell-bent on vandalizing the entire Democratic Party in the vain hope of somehow securing the nomination through a combination of cheating and lying.
You can put her in the 'Joe Lieberman' column. If she steals the nomination somehow (fat chance, of course), I will ask fellow members of my local party committee to withhold support for her campaign in the general election. I can now honestly say that the idea of this person being President of the United States horrifies me. It would be like Richard Nixon with a 'D' beside his name.