John McCain: Does Where He Was Born Disqualify Him from the Presidency?

So-called Constitutional scholars of the "framers' intent" mindset - you know, those cranky, old white guys who say that we mustn't have "activist judges" elevated to the Supreme Court - will certainly have their BVDs in an atomic wedgie over this conundrum:

Presumptive Republican nominee for President, John S. McCain, was born in 1936, in the Canal Zone.  Since he was not born on U.S. soil, is the standard set by the framers of the U.S. Constitution not satisfied?  If so, should McCain be disqualified from the highest office in the land?

Almost since those words were written in 1787 with scant explanation, their precise meaning has been the stuff of confusion, law school review articles, whisper campaigns and civics class debates over whether only those delivered on American soil can be truly natural born. To date, no American to take the presidential oath has had an official birthplace outside the 50 states.

Discuss.

Comments