66.3% Tim Johnson
55.7% John McCain
38.8% Barack Obama
37.3% Joseph Biden
35.4% Christopher Dodd
29.0% Sam Brownback
27.1% Hillary Clinton
This is an excellent attack on Obama. Really first rate.
pitiful
But for the sake of accuracy, I don't think it is quite accurate to suggest that Obama and Clinton are "clustered" in a group here. He has missed significantly more votes than her on a percentage basis, and I would guess on an absolute basis as well.
I find the apparent inability of Obama supporters to admit to any faults by the candidate, and to try to construe everything he does as a virtue, even if it is just on a relative basis, is quite interesting.
Perhaps it is simply good tactics and strategy -- never apologize, never explain.
But perhaps it is revealing of something else entirely.
I didn't mention Clinton.
But this is why people neither identify with nor identify policy positions. Voters make decisions based on Vision and Values. As soon as you get down to the minutae of policy, the chance of some ADD sideshow issue like this approaches mathematical certainty.
all of which is to say:
LOOOK! Obama's friggin record! STFU!
As for the rest of your response, I have to say, I don't understand it or how it is at all responsive to the point I made about the inability of Obama supporters to admit to any flaw in their candidate.
As for your diary - a question. Do you know exactly what sponsoring a bill entails in the Illinois legislature? Does it involve any kind of effort, or is it the kind of deal where you just attach your name as a sponsor to demonstrate support?
Introduction is leadership. Sponsorship is ownership. Co-sponsorship is responsibility.
The whole point of this is that Obama is every bit as qualified as Hillary or John McCain to be president. The rest of the argument is bunk.
They have to attack Obama's oratory, energy, youth, vigor, brilliance, talent and exuberant following, because they ar things that the other two candidates don't have.
The thing is that the smoke from this smokescreen is blowing over.
The big scandal with the McCain expose in the Times isn't some ilicit affair. The real landmine here is thatthat St. McCain is just another politican in the pocket of big washington money, with a predeliction towards corruption. He's no maverick, he's a guy who listens to his lobbyists more than his base.
And Hillary has a long long record of being engaged with Washington's moneyed interests. She certainly has no interest in listening to her base.
Meanwhile, Obama's fantastic fundraising is the sine qua non of public/private financing. He's responsible to his supporters, not the fund raisers, lobbyists and washington elites.
The trick here is that it's been a fantastic week for Obama. America continues to get to know him and what he and his supporters are capable of. Hillary did nothing to stop his momentum in the polls, and the Myth of St. McCain is dead forever.
It's starting to feel like morning in America.