In retrospect

By: JohnBruhns
Published On: 2/13/2008 2:55:33 PM

Some time ago this was posted right here on RK

http://www.raisingkaine.com/sh...

Now look

http://www.rollingstone.com/po...

Any thoughts?


Comments



Wow, this is brutal! (Lowell - 2/13/2008 3:16:07 PM)
This supposedly grass-roots "anti-war coalition" met regularly on K Street, the very capital of top-down Beltway politics. At the forefront of the groups are Thomas Matzzie and Brad Woodhouse of Americans Against the Escalation in Iraq, the leader of the anti-war lobby. Along with other K Street crusaders, the two have received iconic treatment from The Washington Post and The New York Times, both of which depicted the anti-war warriors as young idealist-progressives in shirtsleeves, riding a mirthful spirit into political combat - changing the world is fun!

[...]

With guys like this in charge of the anti-war movement, much of what has passed for peace activism in the past year was little more than a thinly veiled scheme to use popular discontent over the war to unseat vulnerable Republicans up for re-election in 2008...

Also, just as a side note, if I get a job some day for Rolling Stone, can I write like this?

"Even beyond the war, the Democrats have repeatedly gone limp-dick every time the Bush administration so much as raises its voice."

Or this?

How much of this bullshit are we going to take? How long are we supposed to give the Reids and Pelosis and Hillarys of the world credit for wanting, deep down in their moldy hearts, to do the right thing?

Look, fuck your hearts, OK? Just get it done. Because if you don't, sooner or later this con is going to run dry. It may not be in '08, but it'll be soon. Even Americans can't be fooled forever.

Hey, looks like fun!  :)



Paragraph 2 on the first page is my favorite (Ron1 - 2/13/2008 3:37:50 PM)
The paragraph reads like the second paragraph in a WaPo or NYT story, except for the first 13 words.

Awesome!



Don't forget these 4 paragraphs (JohnBruhns - 2/13/2008 5:46:28 PM)
"But what exactly are these young idealists campaigning for? At its most recent meeting, the group eerily echoed the Reid-Pelosi "squeezed for time" mantra: Retreat from any attempt to end the war and focus on electing Democrats. "There was a lot of agreement that we can draw distinctions between anti-war Democrats and pro-war Republicans," a spokeswoman for Americans Against the Escalation in Iraq announced."

"What the Post and the Times failed to note is that much of the anti-war group's leadership hails from a consulting firm called Hildebrand Tewes - whose partners, Steve Hildebrand and Paul Tewes, served as staffers for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC). In addition, these anti-war leaders continue to consult for many of the same U.S. senators whom they need to pressure in order to end the war. This is the kind of conflict of interest that would normally be an embarrassment in the activist community."

"Worst of all is the case of Woodhouse, who came to Hildebrand Tewes after years of working as the chief mouthpiece for the DSCC, where he campaigned actively to re-elect Democratic senators who supported the Iraq War in the first place. Anyone bothering to look - and clearly the Post and the Times did not before penning their ardent bios of Woodhouse - would have found the youthful idealist bragging to newspapers before the Iraq invasion about the pro-war credentials of North Carolina candidate Erskine Bowles. "No one has been stronger in this race in supporting President Bush in the War on Terror and his efforts to effect a regime change in Iraq," boasted the future "anti-war" activist Woodhouse."

"With guys like this in charge of the anti-war movement, much of what has passed for peace activism in the past year was little more than a thinly veiled scheme to use popular discontent over the war to unseat vulnerable Republicans up for re-election in 2008. David Sirota, a former congressional staffer whose new book, The Uprising, excoriates the Democrats for their failure to end the war, expresses disgust at the strategy of targeting only Republicans. "The whole idea is based on this insane fiction that there is no such thing as a pro-war Democrat," he says. "Their strategy allows Democrats to take credit for being against the war without doing anything to stop it. It's crazy."

Hence my op-ed http://www.philly.com/dailynew...



BTW, John (Ron1 - 2/13/2008 3:43:57 PM)
I'm glad you continue to post here. Conviction seems to be in short supply these days, so it's always refreshing to hear from someone that walked the walk when he saw that others on his side were not in it for the right reasons.

Quick q: Do you live in Va, or where are you pitching your tent these days?



Thank you Ron (JohnBruhns - 2/13/2008 5:47:18 PM)
I appreciate your kind words of encouragement.  I am no longer in NOVA.  I am now residing in the Philly suburbs.