Democratic nominee: Clinton is better preparedBy The Denver Post
Tim Rasmussen, The Denver Post
The following endorsement will be published in Sunday's Denver Post in the Perspective section.
When Democrats gather in Denver in August to nominate their candidate for president of the United States, they will make history by nominating someone other than a white male for the nation's highest office.
Whether the oldest political party (with roots dating back to Thomas Jefferson) chooses the first African-American or the first woman to bear its standard, it will send a powerful message that the promise of "liberty and justice for all" truly does mean all Americans.
But as important as that symbolism is, Democrats have an even greater responsibility: to pick the most qualified candidate to lead America at a time when it faces great challenges at home and abroad.
Measured by her long record in public life and her thoughtful proposals to deal with America's most pressing problems, The Post believes that candidate is New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.
http://www.denverpost.com/opin...
Is Barack Obama, then, the ideal Democratic candidate for president? Hardly. His policy recommendations -- when he can be convinced to get any more specific than "I represent change" -- are the opposite of "change." They're old-line, welfare-state solutions that haven't spent enough time in the microwave to appear even superficially appetizing.
Funny how every Obama endorsement is received with plaintive cries of hallelujah...while those that Hillary receives get the DanG treatment...
Wonder why that is?
Wonder why that is?" We know why.
How about this question: Will Obama RKers be WORKING for Hillary if she's the nominee? By the comments I've seen here, some say they will vote for her but haven't seen where they'd work for her or have I missed those comments.
thanks for the info.