Time for a "New Wave of 'Green Building'" in Virginia

By: Lowell
Published On: 12/13/2007 8:44:51 AM

The Washington Post reports on a decision by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments that "called for a new wave of 'green building' across the region."  As the article points out, the recommendations "are not binding for the 21 local governments on the council."  Still, they're a step in the right direction.  

Keep in mind that buildings in the United States are responsible for nearly 2/5 of total energy use and carbon emissions. Which is where "green building" comes in.  According to Wikipedia:

Green building is the practice of increasing the efficiency of buildings and their use of energy, water, and materials, and reducing building impacts on human health and the environment, through better siting, design, construction, operation, maintenance, and removal - the complete building life cycle.

[...]

Green buildings are more than a random collection of environmental friendly technologies.[4]. They include careful attention to the full life cycle impacts of the resources embodied in the building and to the resource consumption and pollution emissions over the building's full life cycle.

Even green building, however -- as Trip Pollard of the Southern Environmental Law Center points out -- isn't enough.  According to Pollard, "measures to offset the increase in greenhouse gases should include more public transit, less highway construction and a focus on energy-saving buildings."  In other words, "green buildings" need to be combined with "smart growth" to really start having a big impact on solving our environmental problems.  Is this as hard as it sounds?  According to Wikipedia:

...the environmental impact of buildings is often underestimated, while the perceived costs of building green are overestimated. A recent survey by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development finds that green costs are overestimated by 300%, as key players in real estate and construction estimate the additional cost at 17% above conventional construction, more than triple the true average cost difference of about 5%

Also, McKinsey & Company just released a study that found:

The United States could reduce GHG emissions in 2030 by 3.0 to 4.5 gigatons of CO2e using tested approaches and high-potential emerging technologies. These reductions would involve pursuing a wide array of abatement options with marginal costs less than $50 per ton, with the average net cost to the economy being far lower if the nation can capture sizable gains from energy efficiency. Achieving these reductions at the lowest cost to the economy, however, will require strong, coordinated, economy-wide action that begins in the near future.

"Strong, coordinated, economy-wide action that begins in the near future." What are we waiting for?

P.S.  The Metropolitican Washington Council of Governments includes the following jurisdictions in Virginia: City of Alexandria, Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Arlington County, City of Falls Church, Prince William County, City of Fairfax, City of Manassas, City of Manassas Park.


Comments



Residential too. (Eric - 12/13/2007 10:30:36 AM)
It's great to hear about such efforts at the government level - hopefully all the governments will follow despite the lack of a binding agreement.

As the cold weather moves in, I'm personally reminded of what a piss poor job developers/constructors do with residential structures.  I'll be upgrading windows soon and need to look into bolstering insulation as well.  

But if we really want to address global warming, we need something with serious teeth.  Not some pussy non-binding recommendation.  We need laws that say no building shall be constructed unless it meets the absolute cutting edge environmental standards.  Will it cost more?  Shit yeah.  If the builders, buyers, businesses whine... fuck 'em.  Our society has benefited from low cost but environmentally unfriendly construction for decades.  Now that we're facing a global environmental catastrophe it's time we start paying to do it right.  No non-binding recommendations.  No promises from builders to do it "right" through their own choice.  We need rock solid laws that force ALL buildings to the highest standards.  No bitching about the direct or indirect costs.  No hand wringing about how horrible this would be for the economy.  No more bullshit.  No more exceptions.   Just do it.  It's time.



The thing that bugs me the most... (ericy - 12/13/2007 11:29:38 AM)

Is that homes are dropped on the lots in any old orientation.  No attempt is made to ensure that homes have a good south facing wall, and then have the large windows on the south side of the house.

And unfortunately that's a difficult one to fix after the fact.



Yeah, and that one's so easy too (Lowell - 12/13/2007 4:29:33 PM)
It stems from an attitude that energy costs and the environment are utterly irrelevant. That destructive attitude has to end.  Now.


New "Green" Regional Jail in the Roanoke Valley (cycle12 - 12/13/2007 10:38:16 AM)
Good points all, Lowell.  Here's something that many of you on this blog may not know...

Thanks to several far-sighted visionaries here in our area including Roanoke County Sheriff Gerald Holt and Western Virginia Regional Jail Director Charlie Poff, also a good Democrat, the new jail will be a true "green" building when completed in 2009.

Please go to these links to read more about it:
http://www.roanoke.com/news/ro...
http://www.hsmm.aecom.com/Mark...
http://www.wset.com/news/stori...
http://ourvalley.org/news.php?...
http://www.roanoke.com/news/ro...
http://www.montva.com/departme...

Doing our best to combat the ravages of pollution and global warming here in southwest Virginia...

Thanks again!

Steve



Thanks Steve. (Lowell - 12/13/2007 4:31:22 PM)
Keep up the great work!