This is interesting: "Reading Tea Leaves and Campaign Logos" by the New York Times. Here's how they stack up:*Obama: "Too many styles and colors. The look is left undefined. The designer may have been too inexperienced."
*Hillary: "The 'I' and the 'L's all look like the number 1." "Streamer below looks as if she's already celebrating victory."
*Rudy: "Secure red border." "Extra large 'R' to remind you just how Republican he is."
*Romney: "Icon looks like a mash-up of the logs for the New England Patriots and...the post office?"
*McCain: "Character is destiny, but this design lacks character."
*Edwards: "There may be two Americas. But the second line of type mushes everything into one block. Unclear."
*Thompson: "Fred Thompson's campaign logo suffers from...laziness."
Does any of this matter? I don't know, but it's entertaining if nothing else.
...Of course I noticed. I like Rudy's best but then I am biased-what with the Webb sticker resemblance and all.