By the way, I decided to post this video after reading "Va. GOP Assails Kaine on Sex-Ed". Apparently, Bob McDonnell and Bill Bolling believe that the "Purity with Priscilla" approach is the way to go. Tim Kaine, in contrast, lives in the 21st century, not the 11th.
By the way, the same people who brought us conclusive evidence of WMDs in Iraq must have had a hand in that report of a 60% drop in teen sexual activity in Fauquier County. Anyone who believes that report is simply not qulified to hold any office.
LOL
She really has the accent down.
A true southerner pronounces God as two syllables.
Well, we know that here. (There were some pathetic comments on this issue on NLS recently by the usual knee jerk right wingers.)
Comprehensive sex ed is the preferred teaching method among professionals.
Despite years of evaluation in this area, there is no evidence to date that abstinence-only education delays teen sexual activity. Moreover, recent research shows that abstinence-only strategies may deter contraceptive use among sexually active teens, increasing their risk of unintended pregnancy and STIs.
Unfortunately, the actions of the Bush Maladministration have resulted in a decrease in comprehensive sex-ed and an increase in abstinence-only sex ed. http://www.guttmache...
Evidence shows that comprehensive sex education programs that provide information about both abstinence and contraception can help delay the onset of sexual activity among teens, reduce their number of sexual partners and increase contraceptive use when they become sexually active. These findings were underscored in "Call to Action to Promote Sexual Health and Responsible Sexual Behavior," issued by former Surgeon General David Satcher in June 2001.
Wikipedia has a nice section on this issue, including links to the most recent studies. http://en.wikipedia....
Here's what a recent article (July 2007) in the British Medical Journal concluded:
Resultshttp://www.bmj.com/c...The search identified 13 trials enrolling about 15 940 US youths. All outcomes were self reported. Compared with various controls, no programme affected incidence of unprotected vaginal sex, number of partners, condom use, or sexual initiation. One trial observed adverse effects at short term follow-up (sexually transmitted infections, frequency of sex) and long term follow-up (sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy) compared with usual care, but findings were offset by trials with non-significant results. Another trial observed a protective effect on incidence of vaginal sex compared with usual care, but this was limited to short term follow-up and countered by trials with non-significant findings. Heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis.
Conclusion
Programmes that exclusively encourage abstinence from sex do not seem to affect the risk of HIV infection in high income countries, as measured by self reported biological and behavioural outcomes.
I thought the Post coverage of this story was abysmal. They're following the usual tactic of "on the one hand" "on the other hand" when the other hand is basically the flat earth society. A well prepared reporter would have challenged the Virginia right wing pols with data and conclusions such as those cited above. But they're too l-a-z-y.