While Kucinich is in the clouds, Clinton has her feet planted firmly on the ground, Edwards is somewhere in between, in a good way. Along the same lines, the specifics and call for pragmatism that Senator Clinton brought to her answers embodied her claim that she is "ready to hit the ground running on day one." Both of them had extremely strong performances.
Meanwhile, the Republican candidates continue to ignore global warming, deny its existence, or minimize its seriousness. This, despite now OVERWELMING scientific evidence that it's actually far worse and more urgent than even the worst-case scenarios of a few years ago. For that reason alone, there's no way anyone who cares about the planet can vote Republican in 2008. Period. Whatever the flaws of the Democratic candidates, at least there's some hope of preventing planetary catastrophe with them. With Republicans, there is none.
P.S. Just to show how out-of-touch Republicans are on this, even OPEC(!!!) acknowledges global warming and is moving tentatively to deal with it. Bush/Cheney, the Republican presidential candidates, and ExxonMobil apparently are going to hold out even longer than the world OIL CARTEL on this one. Disgraceful.
I'm skeptical given the history of the Clintons. And Hillary has been a Senator for some time now. On top of that, she sits on the Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works. All these great ideas, she now has, why didn't she author legislation as a Senator to get those things done? I looked through Thomas, and I couldn't find anything substantial on the topic. Maybe you can.
To me, this just looks like stuff to please the base. And, of course, she is so sincere about it now, because she wants so much to get your vote. It's a long ways off, but in two years time, assuming she is president, we can review her performance.