The graphics in Part II, courtesy of Contributing Editor Lisa Blanton, make it easier to see the connections and the figures clearly in their context.
(Note: at each of these links, you can find where these companies donated their money during the cycle in question.)
These are the current clients of Madeline Abbitt. I am sure she represents them well. Notice Barr Laboratories and MedQuest. They are two of her biggest clients.
2007 Health care Category (VPAP) Health Care $20,400
2005 Health Care Category (VPAP) Health Care $8,400Health care is not the only category:
2007 Telecommunications Category (VPAP) AT&T $500Plus another $2,250 from other telephone companies/carriers (same link)
2005 Telecommunications Category (VPAP) AT&T $500
Plus another $1,500 from other telephone companies/carriers
Since my time and space here are limited, and you don't want to read all the numbers here anyway, do yourself a favor. Go to the links above, and read for yourself about donations to Watkins Abbitt's campaign. You may have thought this was a small slice taken out of Abbitt's donations in order to prove a point. I do have a point to prove. Beyond Mrs. Abbitt, there are other family-connected lobbyists for companies that donate to Abbitt as well.
Anne Leigh Kerr, Esq, serves as the Director of State Government Affairs for the Virginia office of the Troutman Sanders Public Affairs Group. Her practice specializes in state and local government relations, including legislative lobbying work before the Virginia General Assembly and the Executive Branch. Ms. Kerr represents national business interests and trade associations in a variety of areas including alcohol beverage control, health care, insurance, and natural resources. (source: (VLTA)Anne Leigh Kerr is Watkins Abbitt's niece, the daughter of his sister. In Part II, we will discover who her clients are and how much they donated to Watkins Abbitt.
I will leave you now with these statistics: The overall amount Watkins has taken from various groups this year, and the percentage of his contributions that are less than $500. (the little guy)
Real Estate/Construction | $32,960 |
Business - Retail, Services | $29,762 |
Finance, Insurance | $29,126 |
Health Care | $20,400 |
Transportation | $20,350 |
Energy, Natural Resources | $17,611 |
Law | $15,762 |
Political | $12,951 |
Agriculture | $9,850 |
Technology, Communication | $7,000 |
Public Employees | $5,547 |
Miscellaneous | $5,225 |
Undetermined | $4,950 |
Manufacturing | $4,550 |
Single-Issue Groups | $2,500 |
Defense | $1,750 |
Percentage of donors above $500.00 - 73%
Percentage of donors below $500.00 - 27%
Source: Virginia Public Access Project
zzzzzzzzzzzz
It does not bother them that for these contributions the candidate may have commited an unethical issue.
Just what makes anyone think that because the polititcians got money from anyone that they should vote that way? And it is the right way to vote?