What Has the GOP-Controlled General Assembly Accomplished?

By: Lowell
Published On: 10/24/2007 6:43:00 AM

Republicans have controlled the Virginia House of Delegates and the State Senate this entire decade, which is long enough to determine what they'll do if they remain in charge after November 6.  Let's take a quick look at their record on the major issues of the day.

1. Transportation: Did nothing until this past spring, when they rammed through the abuser fees (aka, "taxes") and regional taxing authorities as a substitute for a comprehensive, sustainable, dedicated solution to Virginia's gridlock. That's right, after 7 years of Republican control, that's all we've gotten from the Republican General Assembly -- abuser fees, regional authorities, and worse gridlock than ever.  Surprise, surprise.

2. Environment: Unlike states with Republican governors like Florida and California, the Republican-controlled Virginia General Assembly has done essentially nothing to protect the state's environment or to combat global warming.  Instead, they rejected a "Green Buildings Act" and even a joint committee to STUDY (not take action, mind you) climate change.  They also opposed Governor Kaine's land conservation efforts, which are crucial in and of themselves but particularly to protecting the Chesapeake Bay.  Let's just put it this way, Republican "red" and environmental "green" don't go together.
3. Social issues: Republicans have spent a lot of time on far-out or just plain wacky causes, such as the infamous "droopy drawers" legislation, calling birth control "baby pesticides", making it a misdemeanor offense for women not to report fetal deaths to the police within 12 hours of delivery, pushing for those all-important traditional marriage license plates, making homosexuality illegal, even reducing the penalty for raping one's own child (from a felony to a mere misdemeanor). Unbelievable.

4. Illegal immigration: Republicans like to talk a lot about this one, but that's all they do -- talk.  Since Republicans have been in control of the Virginia General Assembly, what have they actually DONE about illegal immigration?  Not a heck of a lot.  Of course, they've continued to take large sums of money from the very corporations that EMPLOY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.  They have not, of course, bitten the hand that feeds them by cracking down on those employers.  Surprise, surprise.  But the bottom line is that after nearly a decade of Republican control, illegal immigration is more of an issue than ever in Virginia.  Now, Republicans argue that they would be better at dealing with this issue than Democrats.  Do they really think we're that stupid?

Those are just a few examples of what the GOP-controlled General Assembly has failed to do the past 7 years.  One could also add health care, education, and fiscal responsibility to the long list of miserable failure.  Ironically, the Republicans' one big accomplishment was a major revenues package pushed by Governor Mark Warner and passed over the objections of far-right, flat-earth, anti-tax Republican ideologues in the House of Delegates.  Those are the very people Republicans are urging us to elect on November 6.  Great idea, huh?


Comments



You're being too generous (TheGreenMiles - 10/24/2007 9:16:17 AM)
"Essentially nothing" on the environment implies they've accomplished something.  I don't know of a single positive thing for our environment the General Assembly accomplished in 2007.  The EnergyStar Sales Tax Holiday was heavily hyped, but I haven't seen one credible report of it having an actual impact.  Adn the Dominion re-regulation bill will actually have a negative impact on the environment by letting coal pollution and mountaintop removal continue unabated.


Ha, guess I'm in a generous mood this morning (Lowell - 10/24/2007 9:49:44 AM)
The fact is, you're right, the Republicans have been a disaster for the environment in Virginia and nationally.  Whether you care about global warming, species loss, smog, the Chesapeake Bay, open space, or anything else related to the environment, the Republicans are against you.  So why would you vote for them?


I should have added... (Lowell - 10/24/2007 9:50:14 AM)
..."So why would you vote for them?  Because they're so wonderful on other issues, like the abuser fees?"  Ha.


Don't Overstate Your Case, Lowell (HisRoc - 10/24/2007 12:18:20 PM)
The stupid "droopy pants" law was introduced by a Democrat (Algie Howell, D-Norfolk) and was largely passed in the House on Democratic votes, including that of Del. Steve Shannon from here in Fairfax County.


In The Interest of Full Disclosure... (HisRoc - 10/24/2007 6:10:33 PM)
...here are the actual votes on the Droopy Pants Law, a.k.a HB 1981, Virginia 2005 Legislative Session.  Note that both Democrats and Republicans were well represented in the yeas and nays.  As with the Abuser Fees, this was another example of bi-partisan stupidity.

When you vote on Nov 6, vote for the candidate and not for or against any party.  Be an informed citizen and not a drone!

YEAS--Abbitt, Amundson, Armstrong, Athey, Barlow, Black, Carrico, Cline, Cole, Cosgrove, Councill, Cox, Dillard, Dudley, Fralin, Gear, Griffith, Hall, Hamilton, Hargrove, Hogan, Howell, A.T., Hugo, Hurt, Ingram, Janis, Johnson, Jones, S.C., Keister, Kilgore, Landes, Lingamfelter, Marshall, D.W., Marshall, R.G., McDonnell, McDougle, McQuigg, Miller, Moran, Morgan, Nutter, Parrish, Plum, Pollard, Purkey, Putney, Rapp, Reese, Reid, Scott, E.T., Shannon, Sherwood, Shuler, Suit, Tata, Wardrup, Ware, R.L., Weatherholtz, Welch, Mr. Speaker--60.

NAYS--Albo, Alexander, BaCote, Baskerville, Bell, Brink, Bryant, Byron, Callahan, Ebbin, Eisenberg, Frederick, Joannou, Lewis, Louderback, Marrs, May, Melvin, Miles, Nixon, O'Bannon, Oder, Orrock, Petersen, Phillips, Rust, Scott, J.M., Sickles, Spruill, Stump, Van Yahres, Ward, Ware, O., Watts--34.

ABSTENTIONS--0.

NOT VOTING--Hull, Jones, D.C., Saxman, Van Landingham, Wright--5.



vote for the candidate and not for or against any party -- No !! No !! (norman swingvoter - 10/24/2007 7:42:31 PM)
No offense to you personally but this philosophy is bankrupt. This used to be my philosophy.  No longer! The republican party used to have people who could govern wisely.  Now it has been taken over by these extremist neonuts. Whichever party controls the government, controls redistricting, controls committees, controls legislation.  The current republican party is far more concerned with far right extremeist agenda than governing wisely.  For the good of Virginia, I am voting against republicans whenever I get the chance.  Throw the bums out!


The point is, you can't vote for an i ndividual (Lowell - 10/25/2007 6:50:43 AM)
in isolation to the overall picture.  For instance, I thought Lincoln Chafee was a good U.S. Senator overall, one of the last of the "liberal Republicans."  However, he was also another vote for Republican control of the U.S. Senate, and there was a quality Democratic alternative in Sheldon Whitehouse.  So why on earth would I vote for the Republican in that case?  Now, if Chafee had switched parties, that would have been a different story, but he didn't until AFTER the election, and by then it was too late.


Ah, But Think How Much Better It Would Be If There Were NO... (HisRoc - 10/25/2007 3:30:51 PM)
...political parties.  No party line voting, no litmus test issues, just people of integrity voting in the best interest of the common good.  Yeah, I know, dream on.