Amazing (Johnny Longtorso - 10/21/2007 8:11:20 PM)
I'm reading their endorsements now, and I have to say, their brush-offs of Joseph Morrissey and Don McEachin are offensive. At least they got a competitive race right.
RTD got this one right (chippenham - 10/21/2007 10:10:25 PM)
Earlier in the month, the RTD gave legislative candidates the opportunity to enter written answers to five questions. Unfortunately, I can't find the link to the special page they set up, but they do have kind of a crappy link here:
http://www.inrich.co...
If you read the answers, its clear that Waddell is the most serious and thoughtful of the candidates. Loupassi, I think, is finally being exposed as kind of the nice guy but empty suit that he's always been. This district, while it leans Republican, is very much a toss up district. Loupassi, as likeable as he is, has not made the case for why Waddell should be replaced. The Times Dispatch seems to acknowledge that in today's endorsement.
The Times They Are A Changin' (connie - 10/22/2007 9:59:49 AM)
This may not seem like a shocking endorsement to some, given that Waddell is a former Repub turned Independent, but those who know and admire Katherine Waddell know that this is a HUGE shock. While she'd never call herself a de facto Democrat to get elected, everyone knows that she is thoughtful, articulate and progressive, and for the RTD to endorse her is a huge step into the 21st Century for that publication. Virginia is changing, and Richmond is changing, and if the RTD wants to keep its readership base in this brave new world it's about time they started looking at things more objectively and fairly. This is a baby step in that direction, but still shocking...