to her newsletters and have been extremely impressed each time I read one. She is absolutely the model candidate standing strong for what is right, out there hard with her positive message, engaging voters with her great understanding and concern for the issues, AND a great organization behind her. I miss living in the 27th!

"She deserves crossover support because of her experience and her high ethical standards in campaigning as well as her family life."

She does deserve crossover support, and I very much hope she wins.  But, is anyone else a little uneasy about that last clause?  Why is it that Republicans feel the need to make the perceived quality of a candidate's family life a qualification for office?  More troubling, I assume that Mr. Warren would oppose a candidate who had a family structure he disagreed with.

Personally, I'd assume that most voters would be a lot more interested in Karen's position on transportation financing, education, etc. 

I just worry that not enough voters know how terrific she is.

She has a quiet, unassuming intelligence about her.  Very non-candidate like. There's not any arrogance or swagger.  Yet - listen to her speak on issues and/or have a personal discussion with her - and you realize see who smart she is, how caring she is, how confident she is. Karen Shultz is my kind of candidate.

And no - I'm not from any campaign.

As for Jill Vogel Holtzman -- arrogance drips off of her. 

likes Schultz.  I like Schultz.  I think she will win too. 

It will be close, but everyone I have met that knows Vogel says that Vogel is not very friendly.  That seems to have snuffed would be support.  Schultz on the otherhand is smart, down-to-earth and very warm.