As chief of staff in the late 1990s to the Republican chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, "Bud" Shuster, Hugo defended his boss in a transportation-related influence peddling scandal that resulted in the House Ethics Committee issuing a reproach to Shuster in 2000. Another figure in that scandal was Hugo's friend and associate, Ann Eppard, a former Shuster chief of staff. She was indicted and pleaded guilty in 1999 to accepting unlawful payments from a transportation lobbyist. Hugo later brought Ms. Eppard onto the "Leadership Council" of his lobbying group, CapNet, which he founded after leaving Shuster's office.
If that weren't enough, after his CapNet enterprise folded in 2005, Hugo joined the Livingston Group, a lobbying firm headed by disgraced, ex-congressman Bob Livingston, who, in the middle of his leading role in the Clinton impeachment proceedings, had been forced to resign because of his own, personal scandal.
In view of this pattern, how can Hugo be trusted to bring the highest standards of conduct to elective office? How can Virginia voters permit a man so emmeshed in transportation scandal hold a position of responsibility over Virginia's transportation policies?
If you play nicey nicey, you cannot win, as Rove and Nixon knew.
Thanks